"To make matters FEW, PARI GRANDMOTHER"
"A society that does not humiliate anyone and do not let anyone be humiliated"
(Ms. Leire Pajin, Palacio de la Moncloa, Madrid - January 7, 2011, introducing the Draft Law on Equal Treatment and Non-Discrimination: LIT) )
Is not it beautiful? Does anyone object? I do not, of course. But one thing is desire and pitch in to make it happen and quite another to want it real by law, on the basis of complaints and fines.
As our society is not sufficiently exacerbated (nozzle) the number and content of rights at the expense of the most basic duties and as there are hardly any regulations, prohibitions, violations and fines, the "Government of Spain "true to his ideals to bring happiness to his minority of supporters paid to annoy the basis of common mortals English (and visitors), has decided to impose that all are equal (not before the law and equal in dignity : same, same, exactly the same) and, especially, that no one can be unequal without another pay for it. " For if we were few, bare Grandma," we say in Spain, without any translation equally expressive.
------------------------ On January 1, 2011, I did not know how much he knew without knowing. I really do not have inside information when I happened to open the blog, this year 2011, with an entry that ended in these terms: "be optimistic and assume that you avoid disaster [I meant the economy: the breakdown of Spain by the crisis of the" sovereign ".] So the political class, happy and peaceful in his great microcosm of privilege nomenklatura, will follow its usual procedure, the only known: raise , legislate and regulate and back to raise und so geht's immer weiter!, used to say in unison as the musicians of the Wiener Philharmoniker the end of the Perpetuum Mobile of Strauss : and thus always same again. But I hope that, finally, in the new year 2011 this will happen, at least, begin to develop the " Comprehensive Correction Code " or " Integral Correction Code " (and prefer) (correction cultural, linguistic, political, etc.), so that we, at once, what you can, not thinking, but at least say, no one would lynch him and fined him lead to criminal prosecution. Since freedom of opinion and expression have been so curtailed that in fact do not exist, we deliver, in exchange, some legal certainty. "
reader had to be cordial and kindly, denied that Spain were cut for freedom of opinion and expression and further more that, in fact, we had reached the end of his absence. To me maybe I was a little on those key phrases, but it seems to me to speak as he spoke, the plane of the facts, I was the pot . What I wanted and still want to say is that, based on certain rules and suspicious atmosphere, uncompromising and unsympathetic to the discrepancy, there are opinions that can not be expressed freely with the reassurance that, although perhaps not to be shared and even be critical frontal not cause massive insults or reprisals or political or administrative fines or even jail. In this "blog" has been realized (see post on November 22, 2009) of severe retaliation for an opinion at all offensive about a bill. And in more than one occasion I have referred also to overreaction, coercive tone, with views more or less successful (perhaps someone can claim that all right every time?), But not libelous or slanderous.
Moreover, is clear or obvious (ie, needs no proof) that some, because of their profession, their political affiliation, ideological or philosophical, can afford to express in each moment what they please, in the most vile and abdicated the sensitivity of others, with almost absolute certainty that, though sometimes what they say or subsumed in some criminal (eg., that of art. 510.2, 525.1 or 543 of the Penal Code), no one-least anyone the prosecution, asked bills. Others, however (largely the same people so well off that just referred to) have a sensitivity that turns every disagreement or criticism, all irony, any disagreement with them (people or institutions), in "intolerable attack", which certainly is not tolerated at all and triggers "counter" of great verbal ferocity. If they scoff, the mockery is legitimate freedom of opinion and expression. But if someone makes fun of them or their icons, fetishes, inclinations, pets, ideas, etc., Assembled an impressive cisco: blasphemy have eliminated traditional reinvented a neoblasfemia , it absolutely "intolerable."
To give an example. Not the best, sure, but quite clear: they can qualify bullfighting as they please and put the domino sucks, the "bloodthirsty murderers" up, bullfighting fans. Not endure, however, asking to take strong measures to those who think and say what I say, as here, the parade of "Gay Pride" is an apotheosis of obscenity, vulgarity, filth and ugliness. It is just one example. I can put other, but today I do not want.
So, convinced as I was, in the pure threshold of 2011, the political class would be devoted, first, to maintain and improve the machinery of his mining industry and, moreover, to legislate, which is very cheap, I decided to wait for a "Comprehensive Correction Code" or "Integral Correction Code."
And lo, six days later, on January 7, 2011, the "Government of Spain" ("GoE") approved a report on a " Draft Law on Equal Treatment and Non Discrimination "(LIT ) (under that name appears on the website of La Moncloa). The initiative lay, of course, the incredible but true Minister of Health, Social Policy and Equality Ms. Leire Pajin. And it announced that this law would become the "Code" I hereby claim, half afraid.
Not to trust the information and interpretation of the "means" I have come to know well the initiative and looking for the text body of the "Draft", the web-Integral Correction mother, or , the site of La Moncloa:
I managed to circumvent a broken link, and finally, after Summary of the report of Ms. Pajín, I found a link titled "Bill", which is this:
http://www.la-moncloa.es/NR/rdonlyres/FD7CDD94-1918 -483B-BCE4-D2D3783E46FF/135191/LIT7ENERO2011.pdf
If clicked on there, they will find a text articles, but a colorful scheme of 12 pages, illustrated not much, by the vagueness and general it contains. The vagueness and generalities are, however, disturbing, because I think anything you will see that we spend our lives trying unequal and discriminating against our neighbors. We treat unequally to the next he lives and knows all my neighbors and, for example, anyone with small children or an elderly mother, to start the day did not leave of her children, or fluoresce, when carried to school or came to pick up the bus, just as they are dismissed from the matching neighbor in the portal. Soon after, most likely will not try to head them and their co-workers who also are friends. And even be kept very much to treat equally to men and the partners (come on, tell me.) And try not equal to the English colleagues at Japanese colleague, for instance, which is a few days the company and it would set a very bad a pat on the back and even a cordial handshake, if not a hug. Will young readers of this blog, which, on the bus or subway, get up the seat to yield it only to an older person or a housewife charged (I know, usually, carry carts, but still are charged). And there are still gentlemen in Spain that do not allow a lady to pay the coffee break mid-morning, to invite men who never call them freeloaders , but never devoted that epithet to the ladies.
Of course, parents are not treated equally to all children, even if his age is not very different. Neither school teachers treated the same to each of his students at the same age, nor the doctors to each of the patients, nor the Islamists are given ham sandwiches.
And discriminate, which they say discriminate accurate and properly , we spent the days discriminating. Because, according to DRAE (I'm not very keen on what they are doing the Royal English Academy, RAE, but it should invoke its dictionary in a context like this one of great deference to the correction) has discriminate an ethical sense second negative (" giving inferior treatment to a person or community on racial, religious, political, etc .") but has a first sense, "excluding select", which has no negative connotations and refers an action that we perform every day for things (eg., where, if we are very old fashioned , buy a particular magazine or just a specific toothpaste) and quite often for people. For example, when we are part of a court of opposition or contest, when we hire someone and not hire another candidate or candidates, where academics, including students with "outstanding", decided who gets "honors" or when, we avoid the enterao , the abrazafarolas, the picky, the liars, the cowards, the envious, sad , the jinxes and gossip and people prefer simple, friendly, selfless, generous and normal.
Discriminate has the same root as discern , criticizing , discretion, crisis, crime. We have to refer, not to go too far, Greek κρίνω ( krino : 1 st person present indicative) or κρινεῖν (krinein: infinitive): judge, choose , order , separate, divide , inquire. So "Vds. same "as now stated. Think of the immense amount of discrimination we do every day, every month, every year. Think you know is to distinguish . Diagnose , that would save many lives if they always successful, comes from diagignoskein "distinguish", "discern" the prefix dia-, "through" gignoskein and "know" (γιγνωσκω, γιγνωσκεῖν ).
Alarmingly a LIT of which we read on the web of Correction Monclovita:
"is a general law, which operates as a general legislation on protection against discrimination, against specific legislation. "
" is a comprehensive law with respect to the areas of life that includes and the reasons for discrimination contained. "
That of "a general law operates as a general law ... against specific legislation" is, though disturbing, brilliant and amazing, more, much more than giving birth grandmother. So far, in law, special laws prevail over general, of course, operating as a general law. But Ms. Pajín breaks the mold. And as Minister of Health, will give birth, as I sensed the 1st of January, a "comprehensive law", which promotes the intestinal tract: integral by areas and grounds of discrimination which includes and contains. We do not list them, but they must be all : all areas and all reasons. We do not know, because it tells us the web monclovita, what specific violations and sanctions has in mind the "GoE" but we know that the set LIT. And there's something important that does tell us the website of La Moncloa, there will be a " State Authority for Equal Treatment and Non Discrimination ." This "authority" (of course, more mamandúrricos charges) will be like "Guardians of the Revolution" in Iran. It is the guarantee that Fatwas will be fulfilled.
So, again according to the unspeakable thought Ms. Leire Pajin, ZP faithful follower of Mullah, who feel humiliated denounce those who think that humiliating, because it dispenses unequal treatment or being discriminated against by high or low, ugly or beautiful, and bespectacled, and stern, by patchouli wearing or how she dresses or the grudge he has the "sign" for this and the other in any area and for any reason ... A fantastic comprehensive promotion plan for hypersusceptible, picky, resentful and people-many people-that is unable to be accepted as is and not be jealous. These voters must be cultivated "GoE", his only supporters. These will be very happy (the poor bastards). We, left, right or center, jerigarnos . "Syringe" is not Greek. Castiza thing is very Madrid. You can imagine.
0 comments:
Post a Comment