Unemployment Weekly Certification Nc

EL (PEN) LAST INVENTION OF" GOVERNMENT OF SPAIN: CONVENTIONS TERM OF SPANISH EXPORT

TO THE HISTORICAL "AGREEMENT GÓMEZ-MERKEL"
(with "alternate ending" on 1 February 2011)

Definitely, I'll leave the analysis of Draft Law on Equal Treatment and Non-Discrimination (ATLI) for the "blog" brother-AOS DOCUMENT. Because, although that has no waste ATLI as a sign of mad ideology and obsequious legislative technique is a matter (I admit) to quite heavy and, instead, are produced by day to day extraordinary events that require immediate comment, because, apparently, that comment does not fit in the newspapers. [ The first delivery on ATLI and is, in fact, published in DOCUMENT-AOS]

The special event I mention today is this: does little more than forty-eight hours since the current Minister Labor and Immigration of the "Government of Spain," D. Valeriano Gómez, told the EFE its intention " study with the German Government a joint program in which young people can move qualified English to work in Germany with return date "(quote from EFE). At the same time, confirmed that treat this matter with the German Federal Chancellor, Ms Angela Merkel, who arrived in Spain on Thursday, February 3, 2011.

D. Valeriano said that the "Government of Spain (which he joined D. Valeriano after only one day of rest after the grueling part in general strike)" not like ending with programs raise the possibility that better educated people go out of Spain and the social and working world ", as proposed Frau Merkel to "order a program that allows the return to Spain of those" young English qualified "so that their work in Germany count as a" first work experience. "

I imagine the good of D. Valeriano Gómez, appointed former Minister of Labour impromptu, accepting the unexpected charge forward, and, of course, no hassling, "but with some inner sense of vertigo. And it seems very likely that a few days later, the vertigo was to increase to produce a state of disorientation and confusion space-time, as physicians often describe patients who, for very different reasons, do not know who they are or where they are or what year they live. A Ministry of Labour a newborn live from the ranks of the union released that is placed to negotiate on retirement and pensions, with information provided by ZP and Chaves, it could have occurred somewhere between the catatonic stupor and (in the medical sense). The confusion and disorientation have been insignificant.

Does someone know Spain, at present, what is the delay of retirement has been agreed not know who it is not clear to whom? Did You? Why will require, then, the poor D. Valeriano to retain the use of reason, after having gotten into the termomix occurrences monclovitas and unions on pension? Now it is announced that the social partners have reached an agreement - "Social and Economic Agreement" ASE - but do not see anyone being able to explain clearly at least what has been agreed.

So

things and between them (because also Frau Merkel has put their hand a good dose of bad milk referring to the labor supply among the objectives of his trip to Spain), D. Valeriano comes up with a sort of massive export of English (he thinks that young, because youth is the highest percentage of unemployed) to Germany, but fixed term, lest the economy be revived in Spain and we will need in a few years, the exported.

And one imagines (or "show", as he now says) that plan with special trains filled with computer masons, mechanics, panel beaters, painters, carpenters, nurses, doctors and even industrial engineers, leaving towards the Atocha Hauptbannhof Berlin to Frankfurt or Munich, and no lunch boxes or cardboard suitcases strapped and strings, but all with their trollers and Ipods. Or think in caravans of buses, bound for Stuttgart, Düsseldorf, Dortmund, Hamburg, Bremen. It is also an airlift flight charters from secondary airports, complete with connecting bus. A show anyway.

But How do you organize these labor migration? Because it is easy to represent a few buses going into certain areas of France (where there are vineyards in quantity), for the harvest, which lasts a few days. Van with a return ticket closed, as they say. Or can you understand that for the olive harvest appear here, organized or spontaneous, Bulgarian or Albanian gangs. On the other hand, how will our masons go distributed, computer, painters, mechanics, medical and industrial engineers through German territory?

D. Valeriano, the poor, stuck in the mental centrifuge zapateril reformism, is due to forget that for many years, young and not so young English men and women looking for work do not need any international plan to seek employment in Germany. And if they do, they can go for as long as they want ... and they leave the employer. All you need is knowledge of job offers in Germany and people here able to take advantage of them. Otherwise permitted by an invention called the European Union, which is full of rules, but that still does not prevent a German company that seeks to milling in Spain to publicize it and specify all the requirements you need and what it offers.

But for a moment, suppose Ms. Angela want rapid and massive injections of "effective" in English to a German economy revived and D. Valeriano have any idea of \u200b\u200bfree movement of persons within the European Union. What can you offer and one that no longer offers the labor market with state agencies and non-state employment?

(Incidentally, see the website of the German Embassy: http://www.madrid.diplo.de/Vertretung/madrid/es/01/Trabajar__en__Alemania/__Trabajar__en__Alemania.html )

Since

Ms. Angela has made it clear he wants English professionals with an average level of German rule out that professional bodies are sent to Germany to teach English from six months to a year Goethe's language, while concrete the jobs. If that is not (not) what they can occur D. Valeriano and Ms. Angela ? Pay the trip, with the bonus a sandwich or a "taper" of Bratwurst and Sauerkraut ? Not much, with low cost flights to 63 euros or less (Madrid-Frankfurt-Madrid) that everyone can get. And in return for what could D. Valeriano force someone to work suits and humanely in Germany to return to Spain over time?

In any case, it seems that preparing a meal -meeting in La Moncloa with Frau Merkel , some German ministers and a certain Herr Sommer, president of the German Confederation of Trade Unions (DGB ) by German and English side, D. José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero , D. Valeriano Gómez, a minister more and care!: Messrs. Fernandez Toxo (CCOO) and Candido Méndez (UGT). I have to me that this Frau Merkel is a mocking of good care, he wants to see the whole troupe in action, lest the function is finished earlier than expected. If we were not in the global village and in the era of live-live , I would ask for a hole to see and hear the meeting, which promises to be sensational. But as we in the postmodern, DEMAND THAT THE FOOD IS live television. And that someone record the comments of Frau Merkel & Co . on the plane back. And hang on Youtube .


---------------------- Final alternative : February 1, 2011 : Sources of the "Government of Spain to qualify the occurrence of D. Valeriano . Have come to realize some basic things, remembered here. There is, however and even intensifies the Movement " Come to Germany, Pepe , which has 200,000 stuck in Twitter. During 2011 and 2012, several hundreds of thousands of English migrants to Germany, mostly on their own . From the second half of 2012, shipments of euros sent from Germany to Spain to help relaunch the English real economy with growth in consumption and production . In 2022, sixty thousand English working in Germany returned to Spain . Most want to be a chaletito in his village. In 2023, building fires in the villages near the provincial capital . In 2025, new real estate bubble . And so on.

Pinky Star And Cherrokee

the "context" REAL "Pajin LAW" ON EQUAL TREATMENT AND NOT EVEN CLEARER

MINISTER GIVES EXAMPLE Pajin of abjection of self and others

"A society that does not humiliate anyone and do not let anyone be humiliated"

(Ms. Leire Pajin, Palacio de la Moncloa, Madrid - January 7, 2011, introducing the Draft Law on Equal Treatment and Non-Discrimination: LIT))

I was about to explain and discuss the most relevant "Integral Draft Law on Equal treatment and non discrimination" (Alito and LIT) when he reappeared, to me unexpectedly, which we call "Sinde.2 Act." There are both "post" before this. Written and published, I was ready, finally, to fulfill my purpose when, on the same day January 28, 2011, jump before me a story I thought, at first fruit of a personal hallucination. I could not believe I kept watching and reading. I thought his dream transported me to a tyrannical Eastern sultanate or the court of a decaying despotic monarchy.

Here is what I considered incredible. Copy the news, with its title and subtitle:

"a gay association to let them CHARGES WITHOUT HEALTH GRANT FOR CRITICISM Pajin"

"The Ministry will require a letter" formal apology writing "after having insulted a senior ministry official to reintegrating this NGO working group on AIDS "

" Colleagues platform, which brings together various associations of lesbian, gay, transgender and bisexual, has alleged that the Ministry of Health has left them without subsidies for organizing two concentrations in which they poured insults and Trinidad Jimenez Leire Pajin. "

" Earlier this year, colleagues received a letter from the Ministry stating that they were excluded from the grants "for having organized two concentrations, which were poured insults against the Minister." In addition, The document states that the only way to avoid the exclusion is "formal apology in writing." Therefore, the general secretary of the association, Rafael Morales, has called for "immediate cessation" of the general director of Public Health and Health Foreign against whom criminal proceedings have also begun, reports Ep. "

"Colleagues recalled that the protests they have made in recent months due to the" helplessness of watching one more year, the Ministry led by Leire Pajin continued with its policy of sectarianism in the awarding of grants and subsidies, rewarding LGBT organizations close Pedro Zerolo despite the dire economic crisis and Colleagues drowning financially. " "

I leave aside, for now, the subsidy element in this kind of collective. Do not know anything about these grants. But I think the news is not one of them complain of discrimination: these complaints are common to these grants and to many others, and to know the results of the most diverse selection procedures. Sometimes the complaints are justified and others are unfounded tantrums. What has this bombshell news is no complaint, but written admission political discrimination ( particular kind of "retaliation" under the proposed LIT ) and the requirement, also writing in a specific behavior of apology to end discrimination (type retaliation).

is why I have titled the same news these lines:

"Pajin ACKNOWLEDGE IN WRITING a political reprisal"

"It requires a letter to the NGO gay formal, written apology "after insulted the ministers Jiménez and Pajín "

Given the huge project of Pajín towards Equal Treatment and Non-discrimination, one would immediately think of unequal treatment and discrimination that many protagonists constantly government. What I could not think, at least I thought so is that, precisely from the Ministry of the incredible but true Minister, Ms. Leire Pajin, written recognition of discrimination and, moreover, be recognized that discrimination was due to political reasons in the form of engagement (if there was abuse or not, I do not know) and, for inri , requires apology formal, written as a condition for ending discrimination (at least in part). There

who, to this news, have not noticed anything. Some may have noticed the dispute between "LGBT organizations." Some would only be ratified in the belief that while still standing out, a hundred different ways, the purchasing power of the generality of the English, not trimmed or removed, in the hands of public authorities, the money available for grants questionable. To me, although this worries me, and much, much higher than it seems to me important in the news a Ministry Equal precisely, feel free to practice openly discriminate on the criticisms of the Ministry and also possesses the audacity to demand a formal apology for the exercise of freedom of criticism . At my age, I remember , nor in time of Franco, an arrogance so obscene.

Note what ends is capable of reaching the incredible but true, Minister of Health, Gender and Social Policy "Government of Spain," Minister that he does not want that in Spain humiliate anyone and unwilling to allow anyone to be humiliated. The Minister Pajín shown Majaraní as dictatorial. And not only humiliated "Colleagues." Is able to humble them all, because general humiliation is what underlies and behavior, in which English citizens considered perfectly willing to swallow undeterred an actual sample of the mentality despotic in the exercise of power . By acting as a tyrant, Pajín behaves baseness, abjectly, but also begs the abjection of the public, of all the electorate as a whole.

perhaps some will say that Ms. Leire Pajin has at least "honesty" (in the Anglophone sense of "honesty") to explain its discriminatory retaliation, as many others the commit (commit them, in fact), without explanation. Thus, we would be in the hackneyed opposition between the "hypocrisy" and "honesty", always in favor of "honesty", then what the "honest" or "honest." Not for me to support me in the very well-worn adage that " hypocrisy is the homage vice tribute to virtue" (although there is some truth in that.) What we have here is not an exercise of "honesty", but of political immorality and shamelessness supine. There are numerous precedents for supporting Ms. Leire Pajin understand that his retaliation as a result of the idea that possesses the power of a Minister. For the run we considered subjects, vassals, serfs. And it seems, the lack of reaction, at least verbally, to a retaliation case, that does not err too Ms. Leire Pajin. The "LGBT organizations," as close to blatant discrimination, have closed ranks with the discrimination? No. The same "media" who posted the news, have you bothered to editorial guidelines sentencing? Have not been readers stunned but turned itself have turned on comments from rejection? Not at all. I'm sure, like me, readers of this blog do want the record that not all swallow . In addition, the news puts us in good condition to assess realistically the legal egalitarianism sponsored by Ms. Leire Pajin.

Woodsbury Outlet By Taxi

DISCRIMINATION: WHY IS TOTALLY REJECTED "AN ACT SINDE.2"

dismal ITSELF AS PRECEDENT dangerous

(Mangle enlarge Justice Administration)

intellectual property, special by either (that is, a lot), it remains a subjective right of some people: the authors of certain intelligence . In force a law, the 34/2002 of 11 July "service information society and electronic commerce" and that there is one called "information society" (legally defined in much stricter terms which suggests that expression) does not alter the nature of intellectual property as legal right. The said Act deals (art. 1) of "information and electronic contracting, regarding the obligations of service providers including acting as intermediaries in the transmission of content over networks telecommunications, commercial communications by electronic means, the information before and after the conclusion of electronic contracts, the conditions for its validity and effectiveness and the penalty system applicable to providers of information society. "What may be the subject of intellectual property are determined information content and electronic communications, but as has been seen, the Law is concerned about services and of service providers, not the content . The same Act provides that it "shall apply to providers of information society in Spain and services provided by them."

So, if someone says that other party is violating its intellectual property rights, deciding whether such a violation and what is the appropriate legal response is something that if it wants the owner of that right, ) rests with the courts and b), in particular, corresponds to the Courts of the branch or civil order of justice.

The first (a) is a consequence of what belongs to Justice as far unanimous views of the civilized world, but also underlie express clearly what the English Constitution (CE) in art. 24 under the 117 (judicial custody rights of legal subjects, those rights which are attributable to such and such people, who are these people and they, and anyone else-have) and which, conversely , says the art. 103.1, from which it is clear that the Administration is to serve with objectivity "general interests . "

The second (b), ie the allocation of private property claims to civil jurisdiction also stems from a general belief in the civilized part of our planet, but, more specifically, is provisions of the Organic Law of Judicial Power (OLJ) and the Civil Procedure Law, Criminal Procedure, the Administrative Jurisdiction and Procedure labor agreement, setting the fields of the areas of civil, criminal, administrative and social- or work of justice. Under these laws (which would take too long to quote and reproduce here, but which are easily accessible, free, online) to the Civil Jurisdiction belongs what is considered her own indisputable legal consensus, residually, as appropriate under the laws expressly to another command or branch of the Court (Art. 9.2. LOPJ) (see in particular, which corresponds to the administrative courts, according to arts. 1, 2 and 3 of Law 29/1998, of July 13 through the following link:

http://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/Admin/l29-1998.t1.html # c1 )

The primary legal protection of private property is therefore the task of the Justice civil. No Administration. On the occasion of the administrative action in the field of so-called "information society" of the Law 34/2002, Administration can not, if you want to honor the bearing walls of our legal system, constructed in defining the private intellectual property owners and alleged breaches of that legal right, in front of the courts . If it did, how they want to do, would be saying that the definition of this legal right and its infringement is, in each case, some "interest." To say something, I'd be lying. For if for instance, someone plagiarizes a few pages of a book of mine or if it offers any whole, either via internet or copies "bound" to comb , free or paid, to the generality of citizens does not happen nothing of special interest. Who that is only interested in me and the editor of this book of mine.

But, attention!, talked about the interest of the publisher of my book, we are already talking about the protection of rights under a legal business of publishing, no intellectual property rights my book, because I am the sole holder of that right . Publishers, too often, they want the author to grant them their right to intellectual property or "copyright." According to the lyrics of many contracts, so provided, although in the end, it is clear that this provision does not make the editorial author. Personally, I have never accepted these terms: I yield the economic benefits of the editorial operation of my work, but I do not give my intellectual property . No publisher has made me stick to this " nuance." In any case, the book is not pure intellectual property: there is something else involved: certain product materials (paper, cardboard, etc.,), printer activity, publishing and distribution (and maybe leave me something.) The legal protection of rights related to material support of an intellectual product susceptible of private property and located on the property market goes far beyond intellectual property protection .

Something similar happens when works (texts, sounds, pictures associated with sound, etc.) Attributable to someone as the author (copyright owner ) are among the contents of electronic communication , Internet. Politicians do not cheat parliamentarians and the public talking only to protect intellectual property. Because when you want to act on so-called "illegal downloading" Internet content (and not saying that there is illegal and that no act) are not concerned only or mainly of intellectual property rights, but also other rights. And do not say that these other rights and interests can not be and are never legitimate. Recognize that it is capable and deserving of legal protection. At issue now is not all it has to be discussed, but only the ownership and protection mode you want to provide a concrete project law. What is now being discussed - having parked again, and for too long, the issues concerning the notion and reasonable level, today, intellectual property rights, issues that must be given today, some reactions from the classical - is as much or more than the protection of intellectual property, protection of industries or companies exploiting intellectual products, a wide range of products, because the text of a novel is something very different from a full movie or specific sound operatic performances of a play or concert for violin and orchestra, for example.

That said, what we argue about the "Law Sinde.2" is, first, that is a so-called intellectual property protection that breaks unduly basic outlines of the division of roles assigned the different branches of government because something attributed to improper management of it and, secondly, that justice delayed for a clear abuse of power, civil jurisdiction deprives the rightful role and Changing the legal protection civil justice should be dispensed by an insufficient and poorly structured judicial intervention in Administrative Litigation.

When, under the future "Sinde.2 Act, the Administration is to be introduced, preferably decisive justice courts, in matters supposedly subjective rights of ownership, it is undeniable that they are seeking ultaproteger holders (apparent) intellectual property rights and, even more so, to industries and companies exploiting intellectual property works to the detriment of the legal and actual protection of other people.

In other words, the "Law Sinde.2" reveal, if adopted, that the political class wants a very singular about protecting private economic sectors (and not audited in accordance with Art. 128.2 EC), which would be very direct account of the political class through the Administration, rather than depend on what every author wants to do (or not do) for his work, turning to the courts. As, indeed, many authors go, each on our own, defending what is ours (or leaving it be) with the tools that the law provides without the "Law Sinde.2" is obvious that the political class is committed to supporting so throw yourself, overwhelming certain groups of authors . And, of course, who wants to further support certain groups of companies -for-profit, it is clear, no- beneficially engaged to provide certain services (production, editing, distribution) authors.

Cheaters and shameless "arguments" against the Justice and process

A key question is this: if such protection, and fast, they need those authors and those companies, why not design a civil process very fast with almost the same time that the stranger's administrative procedure Act Sinde.2? Would not better protected the rights of all if resolved an independent? As to this question, very clear and simple answers are not so simple and clear (or does not respond in any way), it is clear the administration's expansionist zeal, to the detriment of the powers of justice, the administrativizando conflict resolution. And it is also undeniable totalitarian monstrosity clear consensus basis.

With the mouth small, but steadily, advocates of the "Law Sinde" in all versions argues the slow Justice. Given this argument, is not fooled thing as dumb, not realizing that versus "slow Justice ', these advocates of" Sinde "can not oppose without incurring tremendous too much sarcasm and constant proverbial speed, efficiency and cleanliness of the Administration Legal . Civil process of rapid intellectual property protection would be perfectly possible in the very short term. What happens is that politicians do not offer means to Justice (on the contrary, cut) and, instead, when they are interested (only if interested) the place, sometimes very generous in the hands of certain administrative agencies.

now, administrationalisation similar operation is in progress. Is a highly dangerous for everyone, consisting subtracting the Civil Registry of the hands of judges and administrativizarlo completely with forced and total computerization . After denying "effective" and material resources to the Registrar that an independent judge decide, totalitarian politicians allege Judges-slow caused by them, to put the birth, death, parentage, nationality, citizenship, etc. all of us in the hands of officials alone applications (which are investing millions, swelling the coffers of certain companies) governed by a Ministry (now, yet his name is "Justice"). Have already banned, even if the "system" is "down", doing nothing on paper . Think wrong and fall short. The new tyrants (new age: the DNA is always the same) do not know anything about computers (computer think it is perfect) and guarantees: what we know is to control and command.

If they do this they want to carry a story of intellectual property (the "Sinde.2 Act") or our marital status, what will they do then, for our health, housing, the absence of tension (and are therefore more administrative and political organs of control), or that no one feels humiliated, inferior, or simply "wrong"?

I'm going to an end. In the "post" earlier in this blog pointed two positions of judge worthy to minimize as much as possible the monster if it becomes law . First, to authorize the order for delivery of data to identify the alleged violations of intellectual property, the referee Contentious rather it may-be-require that you submit documentation proving just cause and legitimate interest to the information request and, since before the request can not be opposed, it would be reasonable for the judge does not authorize it if he could not establish a probability own qualified opinion that there is infringement of the right and a list of such infringement with destinarario the request. Second position: if the administrative proceedings arising from the Second Section of the Intellectual Property Commission reaches the point where you decide to take action section, a judge should be allowed only worthy if you have been convinced of the certainty of the offense who would be the recipient and taxpayer of the measures.

I know that the "Law Sinde.2" does not say this and that with a good dose of absurdity and acriticism, provides that the court weigh (weight limited to) measures (already decided by Administration) regarding respect for fundamental rights of the art. 20 CE: the so-called ideological freedoms "and the prohibition of seizure of publications, recordings and other media without judicial authorization. But, just as you can not think rationally, in the previous judicial authorization (of the requirement), the Judge is called comparsa legally officiate or automaton, but must be assumed to consent or not the order has to be governed by reasonable, for the second and decisive approval of the measures it must understand that neither is the Judge for the mere act of affixing stamps of legitimacy without trial for their part, subject to acceptable legal parameters: whether to remove content or closing a "web" is to indicate the existence of the violation of a right because for judicial authorization of a seizure of publications, recordings and other media (aptdo. 5 of art. 20) claimed it kidnapped not be merely suspected of violating a law, but security or completeness of the violation of another fundamental right . Here, when no question of dissemination of ideas, thoughts and opinions (aptdo. 1, point to the art. 20 CE) or disclosure (aptdo. 1, letter d of the art. 20 CE), it seems reasonable that these measures (similar to kidnapping) at least some justification for the violation of intellectual property rights.

Finally, one other observation. In these instances of our politicians affect certain authors and certain industries, who want to continue negotiating with the music, example, as they have been doing since the invention of the phonograph, more or less. But, in my view, what matters is not so much economic pressure on these and other companies such as the desire for power and control and despotic mentality that long ago went beyond traditional ideological boundaries and theoretically diverse political positions and settled in countless people of all parties. No external economic pressures on the real example that I put on the Civil Register, nor in the internal control of the Justice reforms of 2003 and 2009. Environmental authoritarianism is fed, even with an economic factor: the budget and the money is handled that can be mobilized is the real measure of power. So our political class (although they can always be found within her individual exceptions) full accordance with the idea that only the executive power is: governments (national, regional, municipal) and the corresponding authorities . So we reached a purely formal rule of law, where the separation of powers and judicial independence are hollow words. Lawmakers rarely take themselves seriously (and not give them facilities, and unconstitutional infumable with party discipline and other mechanisms) and the Judges should be having them at bay while there are still some that are created independent of the true owners the right to say and make the law, until they have been transformed, as it is trying with some success, into docile servants entitled, subject, as every single official, a clear chain of command .

Ultimately, determining all, a general debasement: to despise the freedom of others (starting with the thought and expression) and be willing to limit itself, gladly exchanging higher dimensions by what they call "quality of life." As this debasement is so widespread and entrenched, we see patients with T of liberal progress by selling as the most tremendous freedom abuses.

Can Ps3 Connect To Ad Hoc Network

RECURRENCE OF "LAW SINDE" a botched MONSTERS

IS THAT NO ONE IN THE SPANISH PARLIAMENT TO KNOW RIGHT?

This is not the "post" I wanted to write, not right now or ever. I write a button fly, so to speak, but not lightly. PP pact with the PSOE on the closing page "website" has been achieved, it is true, increase slightly guarantees regarding the primitive text sponsored by the PSOE. But the result, in addition to not satisfying enough in its interest to authors and almost no "surfer" is a rehash formal and material unfortunate consensually adopted in haste, a circumstance the less suitable for regular formal and material decency a matter as important and complex. It is an area for new and modern legislation on intellectual property, as initially pointed the PP. Replace this legislation by an aberrant amendment agreed to the Economy Act (In) Sustainable is execrable. And it appears that in my life I downloaded free of anything network.

Formally, this is gibberish with three or four partial reforms of laws, with the old smell of tar the stripe in our old roads. Materially, maintains (more: reinforced) an administrative authority as a body with primary responsibility for property, even if it is a special property, intellectual. This is, in my opinion, a very large and basic error, politically and legally unacceptable. The Ministry of Culture and any other ministry, whatever it is called, should not be proclaimed main vigilant to safeguard the right of ownership, or intellectual or any other kind of property, invented or invented. The Commission on Intellectual Property, registered in the Ministry of Culture, or any other law is an absolute monster on the same path of neo-Nazi cutting administrationalisation (administrationalisation so pleasing to the PSOE, which also has always been curtailed and obstruct justice as it can given serious and independent judges). Do not exaggerate anything in the "cut neo-Nazi": A similar situation took part, with books that demonstrate the history of Germany, Third Reich.

The height of illiteracy is that the initial judicial security to be introduced requiring identification. See what the monster says:

"In order to identify the responsible service of the Information Society that is allegedly infringed by the conduct may to require providers of information society the transfer of data to such identification to enable him to appear in the proceedings . This requirement require prior judicial authorization in accordance with the provisions of paragraph one of Article 122bis of the Law Governing Contentious Administrative Jurisdiction. Once the authorization, providers will be required to provide the data necessary for out identification. " (emphasis added).

Ladies and gentlemen, get out to the Insula Barataria legislation, or rather the island of Cabrera, more specific and localized, because to establish laws in a country of importance , as Spain remains (although DVDs, ladies and gentlemen), do not serve Vds. . Vds. say that judicial authorization is necessary to require when to simply require a notary or, cheaper, with a burofax. Because require is ordered with some vehemence : nothing more. It turns out that if the Court of Administrative Litigation order authorizing , the effect is not able reasonably ask, but be required to agree to what is requested by the Administration . Instead of that kink, could not they have established that Members be encouraged or asks the court injunction demanding, it is clear that such requests were justified addressed to Judge? Could not they have required the judge who was required? They could, but most likely not know or, what would be even worse, they wanted the subject of alleged violator of the property is an administrative authority, which constitutes a legal perversion special class.

Moreover, Members of the PP, by chance, think DVDs, so far as supporters of judicial intervention, which is an administrative procedure the first channel to legitimately react against the alleged violation of the property? Is it not a judicial process (civil), with interim measures and preliminary measures, civil proceedings quickly, the appropriate channel to a controversy over the property? If you ever had clear this basic idea, without which there can be no law degree by the "Bologna plan, now is they have lost any clear legal idea. Replace a process with all the guarantees for a prior judicial authorization is absolutely lacking science and experience.

If the holder of a Court of Administrative Litigation Law knows something and does not want to make carnival of the Administration will not grant authorization, either at the outset or later, if you are not convinced that the alleged infringer property it is very likely (initial approval), and then that it is certainly (authorizing " measures to interrupt the provision of a service the information society that violates intellectual property rights or to remove content that violates the above rights. ") Moreover, Judge decent not solve without hearing the" concerned "about the issue of ownership because , although the law does not say so, says an indisputable general principle of law. so, they DVDs, ladies and gentlemen, an elementary parallel judicial process to administrative procedures. And if the owner of the Court of Administrative Litigation turns out, in Instead of a genuine and dignified judge, a mere servant complacent, respectful superiority, their authorization shall not constitute a guarantee some.

And colleagues say: you spent private property (because the intellectual property, time, is still private property) the field of Administrative Jurisdiction? seems so, but the monstrous creature legal political intercourse engendered in so abrupt that still recognizes any attribution to the civil jurisdiction: to review arbitration decisions of the First Section of the Commission on Intellectual Property bastards. Members have looked foolish to size. After IP, may be primarily controlled by the urban real estate administration and rustic, that of certain property or industrial property. Nothing to go to the courts. It goes to the ad hoc committee created , within the administration (more charges, and carguitos carguetes , for friends and cronies ) and, if anything, the non-conforming uses the Administrative Courts. inri For there will still be among DVDs, ladies and gentlemen of the PP, who attributed liberal connotations to these changes.

For today, I will not extend much further. The PP, so proud in their pomp of last weekend, could not give a more complete sample and compelling mix of legal ignorance and political idiocy that runs his political action really relevant (also electorally) that is not its internal activities (meetings, statements, various public events), but of what they plan and do (or do not plan or do) by the English. DVDs, PP leaders who are so "ready" (as opposed to theoretical poor fools like me), have achieved in exchange for support for this unfortunate and calamitous improvisation, the PSOE stop insisting on any of its deplorable initiatives (to remove any planned or pre-law, of many that should go in the bin)? Do you have "placed" his someone in a chair vacant? Or is that the U.S. Ambassador is also too much pressure to Vds.?

note I was outraged, right? Is that I am, very much. These "legislators" pen fourth division, should retire now. No pension. Because if we were in ancient Athens, or drank hemlock or at least they played years of ostracism.

Subtitle A question, the answer to a huge NO. No one is left, or if there is someone, does not paint anything. course, come early elections, but, much more, the immediate dissolution of the Congress of Deputies and Senate . Dissolved the lower and upper houses, both very low, could give us time to renew. What really urgent is that these "leaders" do not keep sending papers to the Government Gazette. Not one more. If you bought go, Spain will regenerate itself. Word of honor.

PS. On the "Law Sinde" as adopted, see another post from this blog (direct link:

http://andresdelaoliva.blogspot.com/2011/02/por-que-es-totalmente- ley.html objectionable la )

Brown Mucus Discharge 2 Days Before Period Due

FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION: THE SOUND, THE INDECENT AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

"TIP blogger ON MEDIA REPORTING OF JUDGEMENT EXIST

Mr. Aznar, ex- Prime Minister, discussed publicly in recent days that the "state of autonomies" should be reviewed . Nothing original, as you can understand the readers of this blog, because we are legion who think along the same lines, although the nuances are different. Some want a constitutional amendment to annulling the whole moviola Title VIII of the Constitution of 1978 (not what is being proposed by Mr. Aznar, if I have not misunderstood) and others, it seems that much more realistic, we settle for reducing the size of the establishment of the Autonomous Communities and unsustainable cost argument, the latter, a very strong and very difficult to refute.

At another point, Mr. Aznar said Spain was "actually operated " economically and that remained to be seen if he was going to be "of law." I never said anything like this view, but neither is any originality because external coercive influence on the Government of Spain and, in particular, on measures taken or promised, has been confirmed by hundreds of commentators, public and private, in many dozens of "average" of all kinds .

will clarify, because it is necessary (although it should not be if there were the visceral pissed that unfortunately we get), I'm no political or personal buff D. José María Aznar, as well as many other facts that come to mind now, I have always valued his second "term" very negatively by many and I think a strong case, from the inidoneidad of many "transfers" to the governments that formed up his last appointment digital successor at the head of the Popular Party (although this was agreed by the top college of her party, which had more sin taking into account that Mr. Aznar was to test their political succession, a retired voluntary policy), from for his decision, not so much to get closer to the U.S. as it reaches the point of embarking on the Iraq adventure. Item more: Aznar's policy in education and in judicial matters, in this second term, could hardly be more wrong and more serious negative consequences.

That said, I seem to have produced two critical interesting to freedom of expression of Mr Aznar . A starred in, of course, Ms. Leire Pajin , 15 January 2011, stating that democracy is "free " to say what you think , acknowledging that could be considered "legitimate " Aznar's words regarding the intervention of Spain, scores, however, "policy simply indecent." The other criticism has issued D. Santiago Carrillo Solares to say, in presenting his book on January 18, 2011 (in which he reached 96 years D. James), that " to question the autonomous State is unconstitutional." Not limited D. Santiago Aznar, but clearly alluded to it.

The interesting of these two criticisms is not, of course, that may have occurred. Or that the recipient was Mr Aznar. Both Ms. Leire as D. Santiago are completely free to criticize those who they deem objectionable, provided that they do not engage in libel or slander, which is absent in the cases of which I speak. The interesting-or at least to me it seems, is Ms. Leire's distinction between the legitimate and decent thing and, as a Carrillo, the rationale and content of his critique : unconstitutional a critical position, an opinion.

I fail to understand how public opinion expressed by a political character can be both "legitimate" and "simply indecent." appears that the key, according to Ms. Pajín, are the words " policy." Ie one opinion could be "legitimate" if it had no political significance but would become "indecent" ("simply indecent") at the earliest politically relevant. I think this thesis of Ms. Pajín not much different from that expressed in hold a private is "legitimate" but speak the same words in a public setting may already be "indecent" . That is, that from the point of view of freedom of expression, there would be a very large difference between self-talk (alone at home or down the street muttering) or whisper to a friend and public speaking.

course there are differences between what you say to yourself or a friend of the soul, quietly and in confidence, and what one says in public. You can not slander anyone or damage the honor of anyone with something one says only to itself or in an area of \u200b\u200bundeniable privacy. But what is in itself a "legitimate", ie legal, legally impeccable exercise of freedom of opinion and expression, to become "indecent" because they tell others, involves a mutation self-reductive freedom of expression that makes this freedom, very basic, with clear limits on the rights of others that may not be injured to freely express themselves in a "freedom" very tiny and very sarcastic, very hurtful mockery of the dignity of person. It is almost, almost, as recognized freedom of opinion, but conditional expression. Given this background, I have the feeling that a little more finely, we say comes from the power " think what you want, missing more, but do not ever put it with some social relevance if you think I do not like " (and may not like it, because one, in power, would be the one to put it).

For free opinion of D. Santiago Carrillo on critiques of the "state of autonomous", it seems legitimate and very decent exercise my freedom to say that D. Santiago is completely wrong. The English Constitution in force does not establish the existence of anything that is not likely to be "questioned" that is questioned , doubtful, open to criticism. The English Constitution of 1978 should not be confused with the Movement's Fundamental Principles National or the Red Book of Mao Tse-Tung (or Mao Zedong, whatever you prefer). As has been said a thousand times, the Constitution provides for its reform, which means that it provides questioned as to reform it without question it would be improper of thinking beings. The current Constitution formally recognizes that the State-more specifically and accurately, Cortes-set offense and, among these, are criminalized conduct involving the expression of certain thoughts which very severely injured the honor or the presumption of innocence or advocate and clearly extol the commission of other crimes. But the Constitution does not allow sanctions to doubt or put into question the wisdom of a provision or collection of them. The English Constitution and declared Republican can be, being, and declare and separatist or even be declared communist the old way, which, obviously, would question the social and democratic state of law . Therefore, enables and protects question the "Statement of Autonomy."

is an ugly and sad irony that the English Constitution is used, once again, as a weapon against what it wants to protect the Constitution and in the most intense: the free expression of thought a fundamental right.

THE MEDIA NOTIFICATION OF THE DECISION DOES NOT EXIST

According

the Organic Law of Judicial Power (OLJ) (art. 266.1) and the Civil Procedure Act (art. 214.1), which is common procedural law, the firm a ruling by the judge or, for corporate bodies, by the judges, makes the decision unchanged. Until it is signed, the judge and one or more justices may change their approach. Therefore, we have far, when I write this (January 19, 2011, 19.45 hours) in the case of Mr. Saenz, still "number two" current Bank of Santander, etc., Is the news of THE WORLD, by filtering (because rule out a pure invention) of deliberation and voting, in a courtroom of the Criminal Division of the Supreme Court's decision on an appeal . According to the leak, Mr. Saenz was sentenced to imprisonment for eight months and also a special disqualification for three (3) votes to two (2), by holding it responsible for the crime of false reporting another scam trial. It is said that the sentence has not been drafted, let alone, of course, any dissenting opinions.

In recent times, has been relatively common, in some cases, notify what we call "failure" of a sentence (the part where is acquitted or convicted, in whole or in part, if any, penalty is imposed) without waiting for the entire statement was written. This practice is clearly justified if, in a criminal trial, the sentence is acquitted on someone who is in custody or restrictive precautionary measures, which should immediately rescind. But for this practice is legal, the "failure" should be signed.

In the present case, there has been no advance notification of "failure" has been a leak of result of a vote. While no firm resolution could be changed legally voted . We are, as I say in the caption to a "media reporting" of a conviction does not appear to exist.

That Mr. Saenz crime is bad and it's fine not free from a criminal conviction have been Chairman of Banesto and now be CEO of Banco Santander, etc. But that does not mean that whoever leaked the vote and the sense of failure, no details, has done well. Has done wrong, the Supreme Court into disrepute, or at least its Criminal Division. And, I believe, has committed a crime.

I remind important precedent : filtering the Constitutional Court ruling (TC) on the constitutionality of Decree-Law of Expropriation RUMASA group. On December 5, 1983, the newspaper published COUNTRY, in strict exclusive news of the vote in the TC on this tremendous issue. There had been a tie at six votes, but on the casting vote (or umpire) the President of the TC, D. Manuel García Pelayo (RIP), declaring the constitutionality of the expropriation. COUNTRY specify the names of voters in one direction and another, which was interpreted, rightly, in my opinion, as a way of impeding a change of opinion of any judge in the long bridge starting. The "leak" was the subject of prosecution instructed by the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court, asking justices statement to all of the TC, because of the deliberate and vote in closed session did not appear that anyone else could give you news them. As he could not determine who was responsible, the proceedings ended on file.

But

filtration was an issue with a clear criminal dimension (art. 376 of the Penal Code of 1973), as it still is now under art. 417.1 CP 1995, in force:

"The public official who reveals secrets or information of which he has knowledge by virtue of his office or position and should not be disclosed, be punished a fine of twelve to eighteen months and disqualified for public office or employment period of one to three years. "

" If the disclosure referred to above prove cause serious damage to public or third, the penalty shall be imprisonment of one to three years and specific disqualification from public office for period of three to five years. "

The violation of secrecy does not offer much doubt considering what is stated in Article 233 LOPJ the " the court proceedings are secret. It will also be the result of voting, subject to the provisions of this Act concerning the publication of individual votes . "

If you ask me if this time open the Criminal Division a prosecution for the filtration, it is reasonable to attribute to one of the five judges of that Chamber deliberated and voted, I would say that I consider highly unlikely. Hopefully I'm wrong and the "filter" (which probably only be important and have tried to "sign a bit" with the "middle") is identified. It is very well punish those who commit crimes, but is dull if you later commit an unlawful grave.Y the injured not so much Mr. Saenz, as the Supreme Court itself or, more precisely, its Criminal Division. A pity.

Clear Line Appeared On Pregnancy Test Next Day

"NO interpretations" and the old story of "JUSTIZKLAVIER"

OTHER INTELLECTUAL CONTRIBUTION OF DOÑA Leire Pajin NOVEL

(The rule of law the State of Software )

While studying the "Bill for Comprehensive Equal treatment and non-discrimination", which finally appeared as such, may be of interest for readers of this blog know a new intellectual or doctrinal contribution of Ms. Leire Pajin, our incredible but true Minister of Health, Social Policy and Equality.

I should clarify, to avoid misunderstandings, that not I have no grudge to Ms. Leire Pajin or have taken her . Absolutely. If appearing frequently in this blog is for two objective reasons. The first is that Ms. Pajín owns a " Ministry of almost all" because between the Health , ever-expanding concept, the Social Policy, a concept so broad that it would suffice with her to make difficult to define a Ministry, a Ministry or a Commissioner of the EU and Equality , which is given or not given at all times and everywhere, all owners of the Ministry is empowered to act without any rest . The second objective reason is that Ms. Leire Pajin particular, is granted, in fact, little rest and their verbal performance is far ahead of second member (or "member" if you prefer in view of its current Secretary of State , Ms. Bibiana Aido) "Government of Spain" ("GoE") more speech, at least in public and the public . It is the "respondent" top this "GdE."

concurs

But also a third case, which comes into play and my subjective assessment. And, Ms. Pajín being the most spoken of our "GoE" and our political world and public, is by far, the most heuristic the Government and the universe. I think I've ever mentioned this to the prolonged crisis of contemporary thought, in which the heuristic absent. The heuristic (Greek εὑρίσκειν , euriskein : invent) is the ability to innovate, to invent, say and do something new . Modern thinking is very modern everything Modenna you want, but it is very boring, does not provide new one, full of refried and regurgitation of ancient topics. To cover the crisis of thought, has had to invent the "weak thought", which, well presented, it is illogical to blame anything. In this desert landscape, barely sticks out from time to time, a syncretism (also from Greek συγκρητισμος , which unites the prefix συν : with, together, at once, and the verb κεράννυμι , kerannumi : mix, especially water and wine), ie a mixture of diverse ideas and incompatible sources.

Well, in this DRYLAND of ideas, Ms. Leire Pajin turns out to be a Champion Heuristics. It's almost the only supplier of new concepts, original ideas, creative approaches. Hence the frequency of my "post" featuring her.

Without going any further, Ms. Leire has recently launched several significant developments. The first and most primary of which I speak today, has been the notion of law "not interpretable" . The historic day January 12, 2011 , referring to the Law 42/2010, of December 30, which modifies Law 28/2005 of 26 December , of health measures against smoking and regulating the sale, supply, consumption and advertising of products of snuff (snuff abbreviated anti Act), Ms. Leire has released this legal thought, hitherto unpublished: that of a positive rule not subject to interpretation .

decades, it was considered that all legal precepts, the time to think or run your application, required a working understanding, more or less difficult, the provisions, well ordered, banned or allowed to do or omit something or other in such and such circumstances. It should be understood thoroughly circumstances, the " this " or "the other " and order, the prohibition or permission. It should be understood before, to whom is the rule or standard, who are its target . And all these efforts at understanding, and understanding that they were called in one word: interpretation. It was agreed that the old aphorism "in claris non fit interpretatio " (ie when the statute is clear, it is interpreted) was a mistake, even a large error.

So far, to the overriding claims of Ms. Pajín, the common opinion was: by clear which are the words of a statute, we must always place the words of text on the context, it always pays to know the history always important to take account of social reality time that these words are to be applied , always thinking about the spirit and purpose of the rule and always have to weigh the fairness . Thus, p. eg., many rules are not applied according to their strict literal, because the result would be absurd and fundamentally unjust. These results are avoided with an understanding of the words of a provision related to the items listed, which has been called performance criteria or standards hermeneutic. The hermeneutic (also from Greek ἑρμηνευτική , interpretation) is the ερμηνευτική τέχνη the Hermeneutik tejn , the "art to explain, translate, or interpret," referred to texts of human language.

Since 1974, contains our Civil Code, Title Preliminary-a series of principles considered by lawyers as a quasi-constitutional "Article 3 on among others, how to implement the standards, as follows:

• "1. The rules will be interpreted as the proper sense of his words, in relation to the context, historical background and legislative, and social reality of the time they are undertaken, mainly in response to the spirit and purpose of those . "

• "2. be balanced equity in the implementation of standards, although the decisions of the courts can only rely solely on it when the law expressly permits . "

In the different legal documents and for recent decades, perhaps the art. 1.1 of the Civil Code, one of the most cited provisions. But that should be considered subject to revision since Ms. Leire Pajin, Champion heuristics, proposed, with his usual impetuosity, the idea of \u200b\u200b"law uninterpretable." Because obviously, the Law 42/2010 of 30 December the recent law anti snuff consumption, it has different characteristics from other laws. If that Law 42/2010 is "not interpretable" could be "uninterpretable," Also, the Mortgage Law and the Law on Hunting, for example. We think, therefore, new scenarios, such as auto-computing application of law, not through an interpreter.

About thirty-five years, I admired Professor Prieto-Castro and I talked with some frequency, with its almost permanent characteristic humor ("Faustian" he called it) the idea of \u200b\u200ba device called Justizklavier (piano justice, literally), which had been proposed some time ago, in sentencing automatically. It was undoubtedly applicable to other resolutions. And happened, in fact, the Austrian satirist Alexander Roda Roda (1872-1945) had long been narrated a vision in which a potentate mogrebí (Roda Roda said so) had a visit from a stranger who wanted to sell a revolutionary invention with which one could retire early, for example, all lawyers, judges and shyster. The inventor had developed a " Justizklavier " which functioned as a piano, with keys for black and white incriminating circumstances for exculpatory evidence, defenses and mitigating circumstances. The apparatus allowed to obtain the verdict immediately after pressing the appropriate keys. Could, moreover, to avoid boredom of excessive determinism, add a random element of correction, which would bring the results of the piano to reality. In the story of Roda Roda, the potentate was very satisfied with the " Justizklavier , but in the end not going to buy because the inventor had forgotten to add " Justizklavier " two pedals, one with the words "piano " to "offenders loyalists," and another marked "forte " to " opposition . "

do not know what to think Ms. Leire Pajin with his revolutionary idea of \u200b\u200blaws uninterpretable. But in our times, the "Justizklavier" has been replaced advantageously by computer main elements: the hardware and software names which have nothing to do with the pedals omitted. To me I can not think how to apply the law without interpreting it. But I have to occur anything like it, because I've already seen. I've seen the text of a law, a decree or a municipal ordinance may be excluded from the legal interpretation and, therefore, who are "uninterpretable." Just adequate "computer application".

encounter if you bought applications, for example, what do u get a positive rule sends or gives them either easy it is dispensing with the computer application that would require interpretation of policy nuances. Since it can not be entered more than what the computer application provides, nothing else counts. Have not found these inventions and guidance for self-assessment of taxes of all kinds? Have you ever been able to record relevant data in accordance with the law or the tax? I, of course, I have the experience that computer applications can be omitted and omit extreme complicate things, but are clearly specified in the standard, usually in favor of the run. Luck has one, good luck, if, with the flaws of " application, navigates to the appropriate administrative office and is there an official who is considered public servant and one of two things: either have a software application better than mere subject or is able to recognize that the computer application is badly done and allows, to print or not, dip pen and be covered by tax law or ordinance in its entirety. Unfortunately, it is not uncommon in the administration and enterprise-especially credit institutions called "what you find are people for whom the application is only valid computer ... if the " system" has not "hung ."

I do not know how the application of a law can be done without interpretation. But I know that would achieve a similar result if all the positive rules contain an additional provision, which I would term, sincere and honest, "First Additional Provision and Chief " more or less as follows: "This Act [or this Decree, the Regulation, this Order or this ordinance] apply in all cases according to instruments computer to establish the Directorate General of Information of the Presidency of the Government. " The thing is rounded with a regulation of the Supreme Judicial Council approved the mandatory use by Judges and Magistrates of applications to make all kinds of resolutions court. So we would spend the "rule of law " to "State of Software " more modern ( happen, say, and probably say bad, because we are almost past). But there is my contribution to seeing the reality of things. yet I say no more than criticize.

Does Denise Milani Have Implants

OTHER STUPID LAW FOR UNIVERSAL HAPPINESS ... OF SOME UNHAPPY

"To make matters FEW, PARI GRANDMOTHER"

"A society that does not humiliate anyone and do not let anyone be humiliated"

(Ms. Leire Pajin, Palacio de la Moncloa, Madrid - January 7, 2011, introducing the Draft Law on Equal Treatment and Non-Discrimination: LIT) )

Is not it beautiful? Does anyone object? I do not, of course. But one thing is desire and pitch in to make it happen and quite another to want it real by law, on the basis of complaints and fines.

As our society is not sufficiently exacerbated (nozzle) the number and content of rights at the expense of the most basic duties and as there are hardly any regulations, prohibitions, violations and fines, the "Government of Spain "true to his ideals to bring happiness to his minority of supporters paid to annoy the basis of common mortals English (and visitors), has decided to impose that all are equal (not before the law and equal in dignity : same, same, exactly the same) and, especially, that no one can be unequal without another pay for it. " For if we were few, bare Grandma," we say in Spain, without any translation equally expressive.

------------------------ On January 1, 2011, I did not know how much he knew without knowing. I really do not have inside information when I happened to open the blog, this year 2011, with an entry that ended in these terms: "be optimistic and assume that you avoid disaster [I meant the economy: the breakdown of Spain by the crisis of the" sovereign ".] So the political class, happy and peaceful in his great microcosm of privilege nomenklatura, will follow its usual procedure, the only known: raise , legislate and regulate and back to raise und so geht's immer weiter!, used to say in unison as the musicians of the Wiener Philharmoniker the end of the Perpetuum Mobile of Strauss : and thus always same again. But I hope that, finally, in the new year 2011 this will happen, at least, begin to develop the " Comprehensive Correction Code " or " Integral Correction Code " (and prefer) (correction cultural, linguistic, political, etc.), so that we, at once, what you can, not thinking, but at least say, no one would lynch him and fined him lead to criminal prosecution. Since freedom of opinion and expression have been so curtailed that in fact do not exist, we deliver, in exchange, some legal certainty. "

reader had to be cordial and kindly, denied that Spain were cut for freedom of opinion and expression and further more that, in fact, we had reached the end of his absence. To me maybe I was a little on those key phrases, but it seems to me to speak as he spoke, the plane of the facts, I was the pot . What I wanted and still want to say is that, based on certain rules and suspicious atmosphere, uncompromising and unsympathetic to the discrepancy, there are opinions that can not be expressed freely with the reassurance that, although perhaps not to be shared and even be critical frontal not cause massive insults or reprisals or political or administrative fines or even jail. In this "blog" has been realized (see post on November 22, 2009) of severe retaliation for an opinion at all offensive about a bill. And in more than one occasion I have referred also to overreaction, coercive tone, with views more or less successful (perhaps someone can claim that all right every time?), But not libelous or slanderous.

Moreover, is clear or obvious (ie, needs no proof) that some, because of their profession, their political affiliation, ideological or philosophical, can afford to express in each moment what they please, in the most vile and abdicated the sensitivity of others, with almost absolute certainty that, though sometimes what they say or subsumed in some criminal (eg., that of art. 510.2, 525.1 or 543 of the Penal Code), no one-least anyone the prosecution, asked bills. Others, however (largely the same people so well off that just referred to) have a sensitivity that turns every disagreement or criticism, all irony, any disagreement with them (people or institutions), in "intolerable attack", which certainly is not tolerated at all and triggers "counter" of great verbal ferocity. If they scoff, the mockery is legitimate freedom of opinion and expression. But if someone makes fun of them or their icons, fetishes, inclinations, pets, ideas, etc., Assembled an impressive cisco: blasphemy have eliminated traditional reinvented a neoblasfemia , it absolutely "intolerable."

To give an example. Not the best, sure, but quite clear: they can qualify bullfighting as they please and put the domino sucks, the "bloodthirsty murderers" up, bullfighting fans. Not endure, however, asking to take strong measures to those who think and say what I say, as here, the parade of "Gay Pride" is an apotheosis of obscenity, vulgarity, filth and ugliness. It is just one example. I can put other, but today I do not want.

So, convinced as I was, in the pure threshold of 2011, the political class would be devoted, first, to maintain and improve the machinery of his mining industry and, moreover, to legislate, which is very cheap, I decided to wait for a "Comprehensive Correction Code" or "Integral Correction Code."

And lo, six days later, on January 7, 2011, the "Government of Spain" ("GoE") approved a report on a " Draft Law on Equal Treatment and Non Discrimination "(LIT ) (under that name appears on the website of La Moncloa). The initiative lay, of course, the incredible but true Minister of Health, Social Policy and Equality Ms. Leire Pajin. And it announced that this law would become the "Code" I hereby claim, half afraid.

Not to trust the information and interpretation of the "means" I have come to know well the initiative and looking for the text body of the "Draft", the web-Integral Correction mother, or , the site of La Moncloa:

http://www.la-moncloa.es/ConsejodeMinistros/Resumenes/2011/070111-consejo.htm?galv2r=3

By this sanctuary

I managed to circumvent a broken link, and finally, after Summary of the report of Ms. Pajín, I found a link titled "Bill", which is this:

http://www.la-moncloa.es/NR/rdonlyres/FD7CDD94-1918 -483B-BCE4-D2D3783E46FF/135191/LIT7ENERO2011.pdf

If clicked on there, they will find a text articles, but a colorful scheme of 12 pages, illustrated not much, by the vagueness and general it contains. The vagueness and generalities are, however, disturbing, because I think anything you will see that we spend our lives trying unequal and discriminating against our neighbors. We treat unequally to the next he lives and knows all my neighbors and, for example, anyone with small children or an elderly mother, to start the day did not leave of her children, or fluoresce, when carried to school or came to pick up the bus, just as they are dismissed from the matching neighbor in the portal. Soon after, most likely will not try to head them and their co-workers who also are friends. And even be kept very much to treat equally to men and the partners (come on, tell me.) And try not equal to the English colleagues at Japanese colleague, for instance, which is a few days the company and it would set a very bad a pat on the back and even a cordial handshake, if not a hug. Will young readers of this blog, which, on the bus or subway, get up the seat to yield it only to an older person or a housewife charged (I know, usually, carry carts, but still are charged). And there are still gentlemen in Spain that do not allow a lady to pay the coffee break mid-morning, to invite men who never call them freeloaders , but never devoted that epithet to the ladies.

Of course, parents are not treated equally to all children, even if his age is not very different. Neither school teachers treated the same to each of his students at the same age, nor the doctors to each of the patients, nor the Islamists are given ham sandwiches.

And discriminate, which they say discriminate accurate and properly , we spent the days discriminating. Because, according to DRAE (I'm not very keen on what they are doing the Royal English Academy, RAE, but it should invoke its dictionary in a context like this one of great deference to the correction) has discriminate an ethical sense second negative (" giving inferior treatment to a person or community on racial, religious, political, etc .") but has a first sense, "excluding select", which has no negative connotations and refers an action that we perform every day for things (eg., where, if we are very old fashioned , buy a particular magazine or just a specific toothpaste) and quite often for people. For example, when we are part of a court of opposition or contest, when we hire someone and not hire another candidate or candidates, where academics, including students with "outstanding", decided who gets "honors" or when, we avoid the enterao , the abrazafarolas, the picky, the liars, the cowards, the envious, sad , the jinxes and gossip and people prefer simple, friendly, selfless, generous and normal.

Discriminate has the same root as discern , criticizing , discretion, crisis, crime. We have to refer, not to go too far, Greek κρίνω ( krino : 1 st person present indicative) or κρινεῖν (krinein: infinitive): judge, choose , order , separate, divide , inquire. So "Vds. same "as now stated. Think of the immense amount of discrimination we do every day, every month, every year. Think you know is to distinguish . Diagnose , that would save many lives if they always successful, comes from diagignoskein "distinguish", "discern" the prefix dia-, "through" gignoskein and "know" (γιγνωσκω, γιγνωσκεῖν ).

Alarmingly a LIT of which we read on the web of Correction Monclovita:

"is a general law, which operates as a general legislation on protection against discrimination, against specific legislation. "

" is a comprehensive law with respect to the areas of life that includes and the reasons for discrimination contained. "

That of "a general law operates as a general law ... against specific legislation" is, though disturbing, brilliant and amazing, more, much more than giving birth grandmother. So far, in law, special laws prevail over general, of course, operating as a general law. But Ms. Pajín breaks the mold. And as Minister of Health, will give birth, as I sensed the 1st of January, a "comprehensive law", which promotes the intestinal tract: integral by areas and grounds of discrimination which includes and contains. We do not list them, but they must be all : all areas and all reasons. We do not know, because it tells us the web monclovita, what specific violations and sanctions has in mind the "GoE" but we know that the set LIT. And there's something important that does tell us the website of La Moncloa, there will be a " State Authority for Equal Treatment and Non Discrimination ." This "authority" (of course, more mamandúrricos charges) will be like "Guardians of the Revolution" in Iran. It is the guarantee that Fatwas will be fulfilled.

So, again according to the unspeakable thought Ms. Leire Pajin, ZP faithful follower of Mullah, who feel humiliated denounce those who think that humiliating, because it dispenses unequal treatment or being discriminated against by high or low, ugly or beautiful, and bespectacled, and stern, by patchouli wearing or how she dresses or the grudge he has the "sign" for this and the other in any area and for any reason ... A fantastic comprehensive promotion plan for hypersusceptible, picky, resentful and people-many people-that is unable to be accepted as is and not be jealous. These voters must be cultivated "GoE", his only supporters. These will be very happy (the poor bastards). We, left, right or center, jerigarnos . "Syringe" is not Greek. Castiza thing is very Madrid. You can imagine.

What Stores Offer Lay-a-way

Conference no longer Fabula Nova Crystallis is now "1st Premier Production Department" ... Mujihi

With great sadness I learned that after the Fabula Nova Crystallis conference was postponed for some weeks now, I think I'll have to wait 7 more days ... Shot! :(.... Well must wait worthwhile, no?
Now traumare me with this video.

http://www.mediafire.com/?jo4qhzg73ozzrch

How nice it looks: (...

Mei Sakuraga

Ts400 Stihl 12 Convert To 14

TWO THOUSAND ELEVEN: THE YEAR OLD KID OR FROM SEA ...

SOME NOTES ON THE ASSEMBLY MAY BE

"It's human condition, like the kid,

little or die or become a bastard. "

We

in Madrid honorable Chinese Vice Premier Li Keqiang . The great entertainment that give tribute to His Majesty the King and the "Government of Spain" (GoE), in tandem led by José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero (ZP) and Alfredo Perez Rubalcaba (APR), I want to add a modest tribute to the immeasurable wisdom and China declared 2011 "Year of the Bastard" .

can not be otherwise, because the 2011 has begun with an almost ferocious pissed off, on account of fumeque prohibited. But the funny thing, and I confess that for me unexpected and drug, is that they were nonsmokers who were pissed off to an extent worthy of the purest and most primitive fanaticism, not by the primitive is no longer fully relevant. The happy "means"-and especially those of the invention (the TV, the boob tube) in which each time we can see better (Full HD, 3D) zafiedades major (and silly, at best cases) and, Occasionally, a movie we've seen three times, in the absence of desire to spend three euros and workers with information on important issues, national and global, they resolved, from the first minutes of 2011, dedicated to promoting climate report that provided in the gap, had begun Ms Leire Pajin , incredible but true Minister of Health. If you already resigned ourselves to anything we knew about human health, then we clearly know nothing about, usually, on any matter of speaking.

Ms. Pajín began encouraging citizens to denounce those that have banned fumasen, just as denouncing "any other crime." And it is true that we all have a duty to report the crimes we witness. He says the art. 259 of the Criminal Procedure Act, a text that our brave legislators have not deigned to minimally upgrade, you see, it reads: " who witnesses the commission of any public offense is obliged to immediately inform the investigating judge of the Peace, District or Municipal, or fiscal officer nearest to the place where it is found under penalty of 25 to 250 pesetas . "Is not it amazing, in these times, the unchanged level of this fine? Government is targeting a fondness for the more mature troubling legal texts, even repealed.

But Ms. Pajín unaware that the smoking ban that, mercifully, was postponed to January 2, 2011 (do not know why: "We could kill us and kill the January 1, 2011 for some good reason?), Has no criminal: a hue unavailable for this minister. And was making her the first proclamation in favor of the complaint and made the non-smoking staff to report as if possessed, as long as "the media." A distinguished institution, named FACUA -Consumers in Action, which is defined as "non-governmental organization, non-profit ... independent of governments, political parties, religious groups and business interests" and "a distinctly progressive, democratic, plural and participatory, "he began to be advertised every five minutes for the "media", who spared any effort to count the number of complaints.

pissed Most striking has been the tremendous invective aimed at the "blogs" of newspapers to the very different columnists and pundits who once criticized, as he deserved, the climate of accusation and snitch, with all its dangers side, some undeniable and very serious. I have not read such insults and hate-filled invective and insults so thick from some debates (?) On the prohibition of bullfighting. Arturo Perez Reverte A of I'm not "fan", I even suggest that you leave in Spain: What grace!

Man is bad, very bad, two suspected smokers have attacked the owner of a bowling alley and may have caused injuries resulting in twelve points (very ugly, judging by the photos) in an eyebrow. But the truth is that, in general, smokers have been peaceful and patients before the start of our extermination. We climb gently towards the wagons and Auswitz Dachau. We have never claimed, unless there are madmen everywhere, annoying non-smokers, since, long ago, we noticed their sensitivity to the smoke tabaquil. We wanted, and I will support who continue to pretend, that smokers, drug addicts and patients who consider us, let us smoke with our colleagues in places where you can eat and drink a beer or coffee. Assume and accept that we are a minority: you can not physically comply with the minority, if not imposed on others? Please do not respond to the alleged health expenditure to generate. We also provide millions of euros in special taxes. And there are hundreds of thousands of patients with lung cancer, larynx, skin, etc., Or cardiac or respiratory patients who have not smoked in his life . Ah, I was going to forget: the new law and can be re-buy and sell snuff at the pump .

We put out the cigarette. Turn off the anger of others, the obsession with self and others' health, this hatred. Do it, if not for more lift and reasons (intellectual and ethical), because they are very harmful to health. And, indeed, that ferocity is symptomatic pissed, in many cases, already contracted serious illnesses, which are crying out for proper treatment, including hospitalization.

But back to today, which brings other matters. In Spain we are in well over four million unemployed. Germany creates jobs while here continue to be destroyed. And no one gram thins the mammoth central government (starting with the apparatus of directors of La Moncloa, a mini-parallel government, as in the best times of poor Felipe González), to which he still has millions of euros to distribute to friends or acquaintances, or sheds autonomous complexes, including between logs and obese. My commercial field study on the evening of January 5, for duties pertaining to the page of the Magi, has produced devastating results: in some shops in downtown Madrid, the more dependent to customers. In any event, advanced sales, fewer buyers than any normal day five years ago. But ZP Onda Cero assured that "Spain will grow in 2013 above the EU average ." And in 2012 the economy will "neatly better." As the IMF added ZP, " Spain not only grow but will grow better than the rest of Europe ."

Other things that happen. CNN + and is deleted in a few days, reaching the same audience, instead, continued transmission of daily activity at the home of "Big Brother." There is a heady debate COUNTRY intellectual to accept it on its front page to Mrs. Belén Esteban. And now in Spain, 87.3% of cases are viral infections of influenza (AnH1N1). In the penultimate week of the year, 83.5% of viral detections have been of the influenza virus A. Pandemic flu is 2009. Do not you remember the alarm and the millions of vaccines?

more: the general collapse of Justice is not worth a headline, but it deserves, of course, the embarrassing news that escapes a second time the same prison with a new "fax" to jail fake just like the first. Is thus fully proved that the blessed gullible in the miracles of electronics and computers, camping equally in the Ministry of Justice in the Supreme Judicial Council, without the slightest knowledge about over and over, "found the number fax and the official role, "transmit" means "as if no one knew for more than twenty years that one can send a" fax "to anyone with a shield and White House stationery, signed by the President Obama ( or Bush or Clinton) and the date, time and phone number you want, whenever you scan three elements and has manipulated the fax. Another judicial notice, a Coroner for Madrid will apparently be questioned again two or doped athletes dopadores allegedly because they took statements from both as witnesses (to truth and duty without a lawyer) and as defendants (with the right to remain silent and to legal assistance necessary). It discovers a prosecutor ... that should have been there trying to prevent the error.

Here, if things continue as they have started, if neither the economy nor the traditional family-obsolete, discredited, have you not read the charges of misogyny against Benedict XVI ? - Reach a good day necessary to save calorie diet and a "little please", that is, a small daily racioncilla of joy, you can put together. And the leaders are going to cost to convince people that pissed off all the blame lies with the drivers and smokers.

in the world, apart from the political time in USA , tension between the two Koreas and the ongoing challenge of Iran to international concerns over its nuclear program, things happen as serious as the murder of a leading Pakistani leader , Salman Taseer , heroic advocate of moderation and freedom at the hands of yet another infiltration of Islamic fanaticism, who fired 26 shots at close range. "Tomorrow the mullahs demonstrate against me after the 'gringo' (Friday prayer). Thousands of beards asking for my head. What a great feeling! "had escritoTaseer on Twitter. " blasphemy law should be amended. I know I can be killed if I keep pushing, but I have no fear . " In fact, this man had signed his death sentence to fight for clemency Asia Bibi, a Christian sentenced to hang for "blasphemy" and that, at this time is not known, nor their state or their whereabouts . Earlier, at the exit of the mass of the end of 2010 in Alexandria, Egypt , Al Qaeda killed 21 people. And less than two months earlier, on November 1, had killed 58 worshipers in a Christian church in Baghdad . The "GoE" remains steadfast in its support for the Alliance of Civilizations ", although it can not spend as much money as before.

In these, it's honorable Chinese Vice Premier Li Keqiang , to say that sovereign debt is going to buy the short, medium and long term. It was enough to start trembling, given the high altruism the Chinese government in the world accredited altruism integer. But no: we are witnessing a remake of "Welcome, Mister Marshall", only without the Marshall Plan and without Berlanga (RIP). The Honourable Deputy Prime Minister is a "Wise Man" additional. Do not spend 24 hours from the arrival of "Chinese Wise" and the official jubilation by the agreements signed (by an amount not less than a third of China's favorable balance of trade balance with Spain), when written as the amount is rigged and is not so bad (it was not even no trick).

Of course, in such a visit, you are not going to talk to the guest of the Chinese human rights. But lo and behold, the new CEOE renewed, D. Arturo Fernandez, the "Group Arturo" restoration (ie, restaurants), it occurs to talk about a perfectly appropriate topic, that of legal certainty in China , which we know does not exist. The man, now Vice President of CEOE, think you should say a few words about it, a touch, mostly by not losing dignity. Well, I have fallen off the insults and invective characteristic of this "Year of the Bastard" if you do not have restaurants in China (and does very well) that if is a lackey of Esperanza Aguirre, a memo intrusive, more this argument as witty and profound, which has become fashionable in Spain (not without some reason): " but, you, what you, Noob? . "

I have not the pleasure of meeting Mr. Fernandez, but if we were not in the "Year of the Bastard", everyone should admit that we have saved face, put on the table, gently, a great truth. China is a curious mix of savage neo-capitalism, poverty or poverty of the vast majority of its population and classic communist oppression, no more rules that they sprout new billionaires, substitutes for the ancient feudal . The new mandarins merely because they end up cheating cheating themselves. Surely the Chinese are as they seem: friendly and workers. But Chinese leaders, supported by end classism and an atavistic fear of popular power, constitute a danger so grave and mysterious . So Mr. Fernández , made of Agamemnon or of its man, said something very real and on reason. New China only know what we leave: a mounting fabulous coastline, where bargaining is not anything in the props. If you will be colossal and sealed the reality of China that still do not know what was actually called "Revolution cultural "Mao . There has been a Khrushchev that lifted the veil and a peak has not yet arisen, and entered a barriers Alexandr Solzhenitsyn with his Chinese Gulag Archipelago, or at least with A Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich . To censor the Internet (and, for us, is some collateral advantage, because all Chinese made download, block and "hack" would be a disaster.)

recently saw again sentenced to prison to be the richest man in Russia, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, founder of the Yukos oil company. Merkel was alarmed. It alarmed the President of the European Parliament. It is likely that this Khodorkovsky was a bird. But it is clear that Vladimir Putin is now more powerful bird, capable of announcing the sentence of Khodorkovsky before the court rendered it. What could be expected, Mrs. Merkel, Mr. President? Have we become stupid? Do not read, do not travel, do not listen?

In short, the "Year of the Bastard", if we are not calm, if we use our anger calmly and intelligently, can be sounded and sound. Hopefully I'm wrong. I hope so with all my soul.