Fashion Tv Without Cloths

THE BUSINESS AS ABORTION AND BIRTH AS Antigualla

TWO CURRENT NEWS AND ANALYSIS OF A LONG TIME

we are all "sons of ancient"

Sunday December 27, 2009 published in this same blog a "post" entitled "THE NEW SPANISH LAW THE ABORTION: few things clear. " As a subtitle, put it: " THE 'GOVERNMENT OF SPAIN' NOT WANTED RELEASE FROM JAIL TO WOMEN who have abortions, but the 'businessmen' (PRIVATE) OF ABORTION." Two recent news, one of them from February 23, 2011 - revived, I think, the interest of this "post", which, above all, will reproduce part now. Then summarize the news. One confirms what was then considered population policy of "Government of Spain" might seem an exaggerated view of intentions, but did not judge intentions, but concluded based of solid evidence. The other, most recently, forcing me to some correction, it does not cost me anything.

In December 2009 he explained, to the findings of several readers of this blog, odd that it had not addressed the legal developments on abortion, the reason for my silence. The theme I was tired until exhaustion. Thought, and somehow, I still think, that "with anything that happened to me it would be possible to engage in a debate in which some really listen to others and exposing the arguments were relevant to the differing positions." But he also said last fourteen months how approaches have evolved: "to claim that it was not penalizing abortion in certain extreme cases, gave way to an absolute defense of abortion, even considered as a subjective right unlimited. Regardless of scientific evidence, because there is: evidence in the Anglo-Saxon sense of evidence and even in the Castilian sense of what is obvious, and forgetting about the doctrine of the Constitutional Court in STC 53/1985 on the value of individual human life from conception, it is suggested first, and then said bluntly in a position to disappear any relevance of the embryo or fetus, and by considering a simple part of the body of the mother, and to understand it as a "something" of unknown nature, as it came to defending a Minister. "

" That lady Minister seemed to know that for thousands of years ( we know from the first known code, that of Hammurabi, about 1800 ad C.), the embryo or fetus has been considered the " unborn child, which equates to our Civil Code born for all the effects that are favorable. And, of course, "the unborn child " has never been something unknowable nature, because in this case the comparison with being born man had been a whim, and certainly never was. It happens also that the resident fetus or embryo in the womb of a woman was never considered " moriturus " and for quite some time, several experimental sciences undoubtedly reveal human nature, individual human life, other than the mother, with a complete genetic makeup. You see, elementary treatment had to be back, for real or fake ignorance of abortion crusaders. Understand that while I have followed with great interest what was discovered scientifically in relation to human life and affirming each other about abortion and its consequences and sequels, the mere thought of writing again on the subject gave me an insurmountable intellectual and psychic fatigue. A few days ago, however, came to my head three things in a new way, which I will explain very briefly. "

" The first is this: nor can there be a right to health. And therefore , not and can not exist a right to sexual health . As I have said many times, a real right is a legal power to do or omit something or get something (positive or negative) of someone. Nobody has the power to be healthy, because neither is at hand own health or is in the hands of another or others to be forced . You can have, because we executed or because the acquire (eg. Signing a contract for health care), rights to certain medical or health benefits. But that is absolutely not the same as having the right to health . Therefore, there can not be a right to have children a right to be happy or right to joy. And an alleged right sexual health, what would be and how and who should be satisfied? "

" The second idea is: lies "the government of Spain" and lie MPs who supported him and support him in maintaining that the purpose of the new abortion law is to avoid having women in prison because of aborting . long time, criminal policy on abortion I watched, not so much to the poor women who had abortions, as practitioners of abortion, the abortionist abortionists and that certainly did not act freely . There are a number of legal resources to avoid jail women who have abortions. None of them was not even mentioned by the "Government of Spain" and their "fans" on abortion. None have been handled in the parliamentary process of the new law "

" The real purpose of the new law is to avoid going to jail for abortion private entrepreneurs and their accomplices and accessories. The new law is just relaunched decisively when you discover something that was known in court: the big business of "clinical" exclusively or almost exclusively private abortion, which had been legalized by the Royal Decree 2409/1986 of 21 November on Centers Accredited health and Opinions Mandatory Legal Practice Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy. The main content of this decree was to allow the practice so-called "low-risk abortions (tooth of the first 12 weeks of pregnancy) without asking for them the usual facilities that require a clinic or a hospital (in particular, without requiring operating room itself). This legalization was doubly motivated: to favor politically related businesses and get them to fulfill the genuine purpose of the partial decriminalization, which was not to avoid prison for women, but promote the highest number of abortions possible. As in public health is not just practiced abortions ( not only or mainly of "conscientious objection", but especially so called "objection of law "cases rarely fit possible abortion in cases of decriminalization ) in these" centers "was the key private. From Decree 2409/1986 could operate with ease and also proliferate without worries. "

" But I was right in predicting (very easy) of a massive fraud law in those private schools, highly profitable, is so massively breaching the Criminal Code and other legislation that finally jumped in Barcelona called " Morin case" at the end of 2007. Public opinion was literally horrified certain facts, figures and images. And the activity was imminent court determined that testimony by many women, clients of these establishments. The statements, although they were not necessarily end in a conviction of the respondents, would hurt the abortorios. And just then began to walk, in a hurry, which ultimately became law. The prosecution has not heard anything (as in previous cases, well documented). And the recent law and shielding these successful entrepreneurs of abortion. "

" Third idea: if you look good on various factors, it would seem that, in fact, there a population policy in Spain. Not declared, but it seems doubtful. And be summarized as follows: the fewer births, better . Because abundant data favorable to the existence of two very strong official thesis on the "Government of Spain" and their "supporters." Such theses are these two: fewer women become pregnant, the better ; many more pregnant women have abortions, better . Given the hedonic component of the dominant culture is driven maximally copulation, primarily among adolescents, but no new children. Result: one of the lowest birth rates in the world (despite some recovery by BIRTH of children of immigrants) "In December 2009, leaving to others the analysis of social and economic consequences. Now you omit this analysis. Moving to the news announced.

FIRST NOTICE: having children is "right"

This first news confirms my view on population policy English socialism. Already there is a clear public position, individual, but not corrected or qualified by the official socialism. Before a draft law Family Support and Coexistence Galicia, presented by the Xunta few days ago Ms. Beatriz Doce Sestayo , Socialist deputy in Parliament Gallego and Social Services spokesman, reacted thundering against the policy of promoting birth, which, according to Ms. Beatriz, "pre-democratic " and against a model family considered "stale and backward " and "far right ." It turns out that the bill aims to provide pregnant women eligible for the aid without waiting for the birth of the child, considered "extended family" from the third pregnancy, whatever the marital status of pregnant and whether or not to cohabit someone, push the "placement family and the adoption and support to pregnant women with problems of exclusion and employment, and the establishment of centers for children in the workplace, permits parents or caregivers of dependents to select the preferred shift according to family needs, etc.

But families with children is something stale and backward "model" extreme right "is what has been said in Galicia, beating the record low birth rate in a state English, with one of the lowest birth rates in the world and therefore with a demographic problem which, among other effects, hampering the "welfare state." Galicia, if not deceive me the information I found, recorded 100 contributors for every 101 people who are not listed. But the most striking is that DVDs, readers, and myself, are the result of a model of "ultra-right " and our mothers were "stale and backward " . What can I say? I think that goes without saying anything about the Galician socialist approach, although it should think long and dare more, and thereafter at report a false liberalism, totalitarianism, anti-freedom and disrespectful to the worst insult.

SECOND NOTICE: JUDICIAL ATTRIBUTION OF 115 CRIMES OF ILLEGAL ABORTION. "REDUCTION" OF ABORTIONS fifty

I swing partially in December 2009. I said the prosecution "case Morin (to reappear soon here) were gone or nearly so. I said "Law Aido" shielding the prosperous business of abortion. Not really. The continued prosecution of 2007 and now we know that instructional phase of the process has reached the end. It turns out that the "Law Aido" shielding not quite. Some of these abortionists reached beyond ends shield. The shielding has only to the famous 115 Morin crimes imputed abortion instead of 165. Reproduce the news. And do not add anything. No need.

AGENCIA EFE, 23/02/2011 : " The head of the Magistrate's Court number 33 of Barcelona, \u200b\u200bElisabet Castelló, has accused the Peruvian doctor Carlos Morin and a dozen of its employees a total of 115 illegal abortions beyond 14 weeks of gestation, presumably carried in its two clinical-TBC and Ginemedex-in 2007, after completion of the investigation of the case . "

" In the car, the judge sees evidence that the accused could commit crimes of illegal abortion, forgery, intrusion and conspiracy. Considered that there was an association between all the accused in a permanent and stable for the practice of abortions without complying with any legal requirements, all acting under "orders of Morin."

"The judge also resolved file another fifty cases that would be legal under the abortion law which came into force last July. In a ruling, the judge terminates the investigation of the case and maintains the complaint against Charles Morin and his wife, and against 11 other partners, including psychiatrists, anesthetists and professionals who allegedly practiced or condoned abortions. "

"Following the entry into force of the new abortion law, which protects the abortions to 14 weeks of gestation and up to 22 in the case of risks to the mother or the fetus, judge has agreed to the dismissal free of fifty cases are now legal, applying the principle of retroactivity of laws [more favorable]. Specifically, the cases filed are for abortions by pregnant women up to 14 weeks of evolution is not supported by opinions credited some of the cases referred by the old law: physical or psychological risk to the mother, rape or fetal malformations '.

"Among those indicted are three anesthesiologists, one of which had no valid medical degree, Virtues SV, a clinic manager Barcelona Emecé that leads to Morin clinics for women who wanted to abort a commission, and two psychiatrists who allegedly issued false opinions psychiatric unexplored even to patients. For the judge, the statement pointed evidence that the defendants were associated in a "permanent and stable" for the practice of abortions, without meeting the legal requirements under the orders of Morin, director of the three clinics in Barcelona where practiced. "

" The order said the "strict control" of abortions performed by Morin's wife, Maria Luisa D., director acting schools, and the "huge cash income" that the marriage would have been obtained, which according to the judge allowed them to maintain a high standard of living and have a luxurious mansion in Sant Cugat del Valles (Barcelona). "

"The alleged illegal abortions plot came to light in October 2006 following the issuance of an investigative report from the Danish DR TV, which alarmed about suspected pregnancy terminations beyond the seven weeks . It involved 2,780 medical records of patients who underwent abortions at the clinic Morin, of which finally ended up under investigation 167. "

" The case has generated a stir in public opinion, after news that the Peruvian doctor had performed abortions under 13 years, allegedly used shredders to dispose of the fetuses, the Morin gynecologists who worked for charged up to 8,000 euros a month, and the doctor, suffering from HIV infection, he practiced under another name . After recording the medical clinics in late 2007, the Civil Guard arrested Morin, his wife and four other collaborators, and later the judge ordered seven other physicians, all of whom were on parole. "

Blueprint For Sand Rail

" FOR WIN THE ELECTION, THERE YOU DESERVE "(II)

NO ANIMALS WE DO NOT vote SOMEONE WITHOUT A GOOD REASON

• None of us controls the elections and their results, but each is own your vote. can be assessed in much the actual vote or have it for very little. In any case, the value that is assigned only real pre-election at this time: the day after the election, each vote is worth less than an expired yogurt a month ago. This is the time to enforce the vote.

He ended the "post" above the same name (part of a sentence of ZP) http://andresdelaoliva.blogspot.com/2011/02/para-ganar-las -elections-are-que.html with a few examples of ideological issues or impregnated with ideology here in Spain, compared with the astonishing statement D. Mariano Rajoy (MR) that do not have any ideological problem in Spain and our only major problem is competition , that is, I suppose, competent people in charge of public (and the semi-pública/semi-privada, reaching very great dimensions.) And yes, there is a big problem with competent people in public life . As for the PSOE, I do not need to say anything more with everything in sight and all that I said in this blog. But I dare to think what MR has been around, that MR may not be fair idea of \u200b\u200bthe dimensions of the problem. Because there is also in the PP. Clarify that, for reasons of age, and do not know anyone who sends something in the PP (or to send very little, the truth be told). I do not have, because of personal reasons to object to the current central leadership PP. I rely solely on external behavior: what they say, what you choose, what they agree on, which are silent, which does not fall silent. It is by the facts, then, so I think that Mr Rajoy is surrounded by a team of proven competence in different sectors of activity or a large group of men and women with mature personality and outstanding.

offer evidence test. Where is an alternative education policy PP, wise, brave and well structured? It is not known. And perhaps a lack of people trained and experienced in education, people more like the PP and PSOE IU, to work in this area? Certainly not that people lack: there is, but has not been seriously mobilized. On the contrary, I know more than one and more than two invited to the Education Commission of the PP, ended suddenly very disappointed and discouraged. Regarding Justice both give Lopez Aguilar, and Francisco Caamaño Fernández Bermejo and José María Michavila or Federico Trillo: meet each other, with their appendices, the General Council of the Judiciary, and covenant monsters that plague our Justice in all areas (I've already written about these monsters, but do it again any day.) But what in economy? We no longer remember the great signing, D. Manuel Pizarro, who sailed with great fanfare when he cursed the lack Pizarro was to get into the world partitocrático. Al Pizarro good after losing a TV debate with Mr Solbes, we were floored to boredom and neglect. Now everyone recognizes that Pizarro was right and Solbes, however, had only tables for surfing dialectical and, of course (for that was financial vice president) all-world data (truncated or not is another story) immediately available. I could go on with examples, but today is enough.

Some might say and now I'm hearing: " good, but compare with the PSOE you." For me it's no comparison. would be good if the standard of competition be established including a single factor as the preparation of Ms. Leire Pajin! Indeed, MR has not openly brandished his team competition by comparison with members of the successive "governments of Spain presided over by ZP: I would have been an insult to his own people and for the same MR. However, the comparison was floating and floating in the background.

But go now to the topic of most interest here, which is merits to win an election, and the individual level - that of you, reader, and mine-that of the merits to get our vote : do not control the elections and their results, but each is own your vote. Everyone can appreciate their vote and have it for very little. In any case, the value that is assigned only real pre-election at this time: the day after the election, each vote is worth less than an expired yogurt a month ago. This is the time to enforce the vote.

THE

GOOD REASONS TO VOTE NO NO ZP, by themselves, A GOOD REASON TO VOTE MR

In the post "MORE THAN 20 REASONS NOT TO VOTE W. AND NO ONE TO VOTE A H. ", of June 26, 2009, http://andresdelaoliva.blogspot.com/2009/06/20-razones-para-no-votar-xy-ni una.html -I referred to great Julio Camba, in particular, his book " A year in the other world " which was the year that had passed in the U.S. Camba and, more specifically, in New York. Several chronic my admired arousano recounted the presidential contest between Woodrow Wilson 1916 and Charles E. Hughes, the Republican candidate. And Camba reproduced (or invented) this phrase: " 'I know more than twenty good reasons not to vote for Mr. Wilson," wrote one voter, "but I know not one to vote for Mr. Hughes'. Mr. Wilson, in fact, has many faults, and Hughes spent life brought. What happens is that, faced with these failures, Mr. Hughes does not have any quality . "

In June 2009 I was not beyond the appointment and a hint. Now I'll go further. Let us apply the described American situation from 1916 to today's English, but regardless of personal qualities, for surely our equivalent to Mr. Wilson and Mr. Hughes does not lack any good. There are over twenty good reasons not to vote Rodríguez Zapatero (ZP) (PSOE) , but how many there are good reasons to vote for Mariano Rajoy (MR) (PP)? There are those who think that 20 or 2000 good reasons to not vote for Zapatero (PSOE) up a good enough reason to vote MR (or PP). It seems to me that jump ("X not vote ... vote ergo Y") is not physically or metaphysically, as clear as presented. Exercise a little logic: ZP vote (or PSOE) is one possible action. And vote for MR (or PP) is another possible action, other than the above. There is some connection between them, because you can not vote in ZP and also vote on the same day and the same, MR. But the connection does not become maximum intensity, such as that between a cause and effect: it is undeniable that not vote ZP (PSOE) does not determine, either physically or metaphysically, vote MR (PP). You can, according to the physical and metaphysical logic, no vote and no vote ZP MR.

This undeniable right not to vote or to one (s) or to the other (s) is a major heresies against the Catechism System and enunciate only supposed to throw us over all content, which anti-abstinence plus content, which the "useful vote." content, which are passionate and interested that appeal to the visceral and fallacies abound. Basic these content, which is, above all, propose to vote for PP ZP hate to vote or hate Rajoy ZP. A lack of reasons and arguments, revive and breathe hatred, gut feelings. That fits the story irrational "they" and "our" .

Then there's the fallacy: if you do not vote or ZP or MR, because neither won over slightly, you are not a responsible citizen, it does not participate . And it is not you a reasonable person, because he expects or intends to perfection is not expected in electoral choices. The truth is very different: here we are taking very seriously the election date and use the vote that each belongs. We maximum participation and we are thinking, reasoning. And then to think and reason, we participate as if you vote to ZP as if they vote for MR as if no vote in either or not vote for anyone. The truth is that the catechists and of officials would like a system turnout whereby citizens flocked to the polls to deposit envelopes received by mail and enclosed with the ballot introduced in party headquarters. Nothing to think or reason, nothing to see which ballot have gotten into: as in the joke, "that would be contrary to the secrecy of the vote!" And it is not true that rational voters we are waiting for perfection in any of the offers : we are satisfied that we have a decent program and we are content with having a good reason to support any option, a good counterbalanced reason twenty or five good reasons for not supporting .

face electoral bids diverse if there are no reasons to support either of them, why would it be wrong not to support any? It seems, rather, that it is rational or reasonable, because not be defended as reasonable to vote for someone without any reason . The only bad thing is abstinence can be due to laziness. But that laziness is easy to remove: will appear at the polling station and vote on white (ie, the packet is delivered without anything inside) or nil rate. Thus, it is clear that one has not acted out of laziness and, well, nobody can sign up on a list of disaffected abstainers.

THE "vote" and the "lesser evil": TWO DEADLY TRAPS

For its part, the content, which the "useful vote" assumes that the utility must take precedence over rationality, which, as a principle or axiom is of great weakness. If you do not talk about what some other candidates and they can be useful, but the utility of voter Can be useful to me what I do against the dictates of my mind? The possibility of utility the irrational is found exclusively in the territory of chance, luck. But luck is playing the lottery or casinos. And, indeed, the appeal to "vote" applies only if the voter to vote to find reasons and reasons to vote B. You can then decide whether to vote B, because the pro-B results are more likely to achieve the vote in A, despite a slightly greater weight of his personal reasons to vote A. But when there is reason to vote or to A or B (or has good reasons not to vote or to A or B), what the voter would be to the value of supporting what he considers unworthy of his personal support?

To answer this question is then the thesis of " lesser evil." Some say: " yes, there is no reason to vote for A or B to vote, but because the success rate B of B is less bad than that of A ." And others say the same thing in reverse. The immediate consequence to some or other event as the "lesser evil" is that everyone just voting, inevitably, which, in itself, it seems wrong , because we have not found a good reason to vote for him ( or yes, just that against a good reason to vote for A or B are six good reasons not to vote or to A or B). But there is something very serious to the vote the "lesser evil" and which mediate or indirectly , systematic voting in favor of the "lesser evil" contributes decisively to perpetuate a status quo one considers undesirable for himself and for others . Election after election, vote the "lesser evil " prevents any possibility of regeneration and even slight improvement of things. The "lesser evils " even thinner, but growing to keep calling them strangely paradoxical "Minor."

And, in an individual level, the "lesser evil " convinced you are, first, abusing your instinctive citizenship and, second, increasingly disregarding your personal criteria because they consider your vote as conquered beforehand by the contraption of " lesser evil." Paradoxically, your high level of opposition to the "greater evil" causes the "lesser evil" do not make the slightest attention, not the least amended. Put another way: how they think that, in order to accounts and even via the "lesser evil", you " of yours", not paint anything for those " yours" made no effort to merit, truth, your vote. You see, instead, as if striving to "earn" votes inclined in principle to the "greater evil".

There is also a reasonable and more, even, when we must rationally put in the position of the "lesser evil": thinking about the least bad a horizon limited to four years until the next election. So, with that broader perspective, it may be perfectly legitimate and successful think that the triumph of the "lesser evil" short-term very likely lead to a "greater evil" medium term.

As I said (and certainly more than I'll have forgotten), it seems to me that, physically and metaphysically, 20 or 1000 good reasons not to vote for the PSOE / ZP / XX are not one good reason to vote for the PP / MR . Now for an exercise in imagination. Let us assume that according to the nature of things, which shows the clear difference between the option to vote or not vote for the PSOE (ZP) and the option to vote or vote for the PP (MR), two million voters determined to not vote PSOE (ZP) are targeted to the criterion "MY VOTE IS FOR THE CURRE" (or, if you prefer something more polite and academic, "MY VOTE WHICH deserve it ") and come with cold logic, first search for reasons to decide on the first option (to vote for the PSOE and ZP) (which only takes them a second, because they have seen over twenty good reasons not to vote or ZP PSOE) and then to look for good reasons (at least one good reason) to decide on the second option (to vote for the PP and MR). Suppose that a million and half of those two million voters, this method as rationally conclude that lack a good reason to vote for the PP (MR) (or have good reasons , weight, not to vote for the PP / MR). Suppose that million and a half of white voters decide to vote or abstain. How to influence that decision in the election outcome? I think the influence that the PP would not win the next general election or not win with enough margin to govern. Later. the PP would have to change or consolidate.

Except big news, which I find highly unlikely, I have already decided what will I do with my vote, although I do not want to say. But I mean and a half million voters condition their vote to the PP that the PP MR and the same MR clarification, should be strengthened with competent people and present a positive agenda, not too vague, it would be a pressure , it is possible a thousand different ways: each voter may find different ways and there is time- highly beneficial for this country . Because it deserves to be seen how many votes the PSOE, the PP and how many other smaller political formations . But there is no doubt that we, the English no longer deserve the same kind current policy. And if we could not change with the upcoming general elections, which, in a sense, it could, at least they should know that do not have a decent public support.

Number Color On Licence Plates Ontario

total rejection WHY THE" ACT SINDE.2 "

dismal ITSELF AS PRECEDENT dangerous

(updated version, unfortunately, the post of January 27, 2011)

( It destroys enlarge Justice Administration, fairy copyright)

• NOTE: I'm one to know, at 22.30 on 16 January 2011 in the newspaper La Gaceta de los Negocios, Intereconomía group appears as if it were an article of mine, with my signature text entitled "An Act Sinde ': aberrant sloppy." important to me to state that I have not sent that text to that newspaper. Responded positively to a request for permission to reproduce an entry in this blog, as long as such entry and record the provenance.'s Comment seems superfluous to me what happened.

Intellectual property in particular it is (that is, a lot), it remains a subjective right some people: the authors of certain products of intelligence. In force a law, the 34/2002 of 11 July "service information society and electronic commerce " and that there is a so-called information society "(legally defined much narrower terms than the term suggests) does not alter the nature of intellectual property as a legal right. The said Act deals (art. 1) of "information and electronic contracting in relation to the obligations of providers services including acting as intermediaries in the transmission of content by telecommunications networks, commercial communications by electronic means, the information before and after the conclusion of electronic contracts, the conditions for its validity and effectiveness, and the penalty regime applicable to service providers the information society. "What may be the subject of intellectual property are determined information content and electronic communications, but as has been seen, the Law is concerned about services and of service providers, not the content . The same Act provides that the "Shall apply to service providers of the information society established in Spain and services provided by them." The oft-law does not change the intellectual property rights.

So, if someone says that other party is violating its intellectual property rights, deciding whether such a violation and what is the appropriate legal response is something that a) rests with the courts b) in particular, corresponds to the Courts of the branch or order Civil Justice.

The first (a) is a consequence of what belongs to Justice as far unanimous views of the civilized world, but also underlie express clearly what the English Constitution (CE) in his art. 24 under the 117 (judicial protection of rights of legal subjects, those rights which are attributable to such and such persons , which are of these people and of them alone, and nobody else - have ) and that, conversely , says the art. 103.1, from which it is clear that the Administration is to serve with objectivity "general interests ". In these provisions the Constitution says what the diverse powers of the Courts of Justice and Public Administration. Law Sinde.2 unfortunately passed, should not alter this "deal" of responsibility to separate bodies (a non-state powers).

The second (b), ie, the allocation of private property claims to civil jurisdiction also derives from a general belief in the civilized part of our planet, but, more specifically, is provided in the Organic Law of Judicial Power (OLJ) and Civil Procedure Law, Criminal Procedure, of Administrative Courts and Labour Procedure, when establishing the areas of areas of civil, criminal, administrative litigation or labor and social justice. Under these laws (which would take too long to quote and reproduce here, but they are easily accessible, free, online) to the Civil Jurisdiction belongs what is considered her own indisputable legal consensus, residually, as appropriate expressly under the laws of another order or branch of the Court (art. 9.2 LOPJ) (see in particular, which corresponds to the administrative courts, according to arts. 1, 2 and 3 of Law 29/1998 , from July 13 through link:

http://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/Admin/l29-1998.t1.html # c1 )

The primary legal protection of private property is therefore the task of the Civil Justice. No Administration. On the occasion of the administrative action in the field of so-called "information society " of the Law 34/2002, the Administration should not, if I wanted to respect the load-bearing walls of our legal system, constructed in defining the ownership of private intellectual property and alleged violations of that legal right, in front of the courts. In doing so, as it will do, is asserting that the definition of this legal right and its infringement is, in each case, some "interest." And in saying so, the law "Sinde.2" is, so to speak, lying , untruthfully knowing (ignorance can not be assumed here). Because if, for instance, someone plagiarizes a few pages of a book of mine or if it offers whole to anyone, whether via Internet or photocopies "bound" with comb, free or paid, to the majority of citizens do not think of anything of special interest. Who that is only interested in me and the editor of this book of mine . No interest.

But, attention!, Because as we speak -continuing the example, the interest of the publisher of my book , are already talking about the protection of rights under a legal business of publishing and no longer be said that we talk about intellectual property right of my book, because I am the sole holder of that right . [SECTION: Editorials, very often, they want the author to grant them their right to intellectual property or "copyright." According to the lyrics of many contracts, so provided, although in the end, it is clear that this provision does not make the editorial author. (It is clear, for example, that an accusation of plagiarism can only legitimately make the mastermind, I have to do it myself, if I want). Personally, I have never accepted these terms: what I propose is yield economic benefits from exploitation of my editorial work, but I do not give my intellectual property . And no publisher has hit me this "nuance".] In any case, the book is not pure intellectual property: there is something else involved: certain product materials (paper, cardboard, etc.,), Printer activity, publishing and distribution (and maybe leave me something.) The legal protection of rights related to the material support of an intellectual product susceptible of private property and located on the property market is not intellectual property protection, but goes far beyond the protection of intellectual property .

Something similar happens when works (texts, sounds, pictures associated with sound, etc.) attributable to someone as the author (copyright owner) are among the contents of electronic communications and the Internet. not fool politicians and parliamentarians to the public speaking only or mainly to protect intellectual property . Because when you want to act on so-called "illegal downloading" Internet content (and not saying that there is never illegal and that there will never act) are not concerned only or mainly of intellectual property rights, but also and above all other rights. And do not say that these other rights and interests are not can be and are never legitimate. I admit that may be capable and deserving of legal protection. But what was discussed with the draft "Law Sinde.2" was all he had and has to be discussed, but only the role and way of "protection" of various rights -not only or primarily the right of property, insist that proposed to provide a specific bill. At issue - having parked again, and for too long, the issues concerning the notion and reasonable level today of intellectual property rights, issues that must be given today, some reactions from classic - was even more than the protection of intellectual property, protection of industries or companies exploiting intellectual products, products which are very different, because the text of a novel is something very different from a full movie or specific sound operatic interpretations of a work or a concerto for violin and orchestra, for example.

That said, what I hold on the already approved "Sinde.2 Law" (leaving aside if it is effective) is, first, that is a so-called intellectual property protection that breaks unduly basic outlines of the division of roles assigned to different branches of government, because it gives the Administration some unlike her and, secondly, that justice delayed a clear abuse of power, civil jurisdiction deprives the rightful role and change the legal protection civil justice should be dispensed by an insufficient and poorly structured judicial intervention of Administrative Litigation .

When under the "Law Sinde.2" Management is introduced, preferably decisive justice courts, in matters supposedly subjective rights of ownership, it is undeniable that the Administration, under the Government is trying ultaproteger, not so much holders (apparent) intellectual property rights, but even more so, to industries and companies exploiting intellectual property works, ultraprotección to the detriment of the legal and actual protection of other people.

In other words, the "Law Sinde.2" reveals that the political class wanted a singular protection of some private economic sectors (and not audited in accordance with Art. 128.2 EC), which bear most directly account of the political class by the Administration, rather than relying on what each author want to do (or not do) for his work, turning to the courts. As, indeed, many authors and we were going, each on our own, defending what is ours (or leaving it be) with the tools that gave us the law without the "Law Sinde.2", it is obvious that political class was so determined to throw yourself support, overwhelming, certain groups of authors. And, of course, who wanted further support to certain groups of companies-for-profit, of course is not beneficially-are dedicated to provide certain services (production, editing, distribution), the writers in question.

The "real proof" of who are the beneficiaries principalis "protection" of intellectual property is that the administrative procedure invented not open only at the request of the holders of intellectual property .

Cheaters and shameless "arguments" against the Justice and process

A key question is this: if such protection, and fast, they needed these authors and those companies, why not design a civil proceeding very fast with almost the same time the stranger's administrative procedure Act Sinde.2? had it not been and would not be better protected if the rights of all resolved an independent? As to this question, very clear and simple answer is not so simple and clear (or has not responded in any way), it is clear the administration's expansionist zeal, to the detriment of the powers of Justice, administrativizando conflict resolution. And it is also undeniable totalitarian monstrosity clear consensus basis. I leave writing as a citizen, as a jurist and author .

With the mouth small, but steadily, advocates of the "Law Sinde" in all its versions argues the slowness of justice. Given this argument, is not fooled thing as dumb, not realizing that, compared to "slow Justice", those defenders of the "Law Sinde" can not oppose without incurring tremendous excess of sarcasm, a proverbial constant speed, Legal effectiveness and cleanliness Administration. Civil process of rapid intellectual property protection would have been perfectly possible in the very short term. What happens is that politicians will not submit to justice and provide no means to Justice (on the contrary, cut) and, instead, when they are interested (only if interested), put, sometimes very generous, in the hands of certain administrative agencies.

now, a similar operation administrationalisation is ongoing. Is a highly dangerous for all, consisting of subtracting the Civil Registry the hands of judges and administrativizarlo completely with forced and total computerization. After denying "effective" and material resources to the Registrar that an independent judge decide, totalitarian politicians claim the slowness of the Judges, caused by them, to put the birth, death, parentage, nationality, citizenship , etc. all of us in the hands of officials alone applications (which are investing millions, swelling the coffers of certain companies) governed by a Ministry (now, yet his name is "Justice"). Have already banned, even if the "system" is "down" do anything on paper. Think wrong and fall short. The new tyrants (new age: the DNA is always the same) do not know anything about computers (computer think it is perfect) and guarantees: what we know is to control and send .

If you have committed the above to mind (yes, "a story") intellectual property (the "Act Sinde.2") or our marital status, what will they do all day these, for our health, housing, the absence of tension (and are therefore more administrative and political organs of control) or for anyone to feel humiliated, inferior, or simply "wrong"?

I'm going to an end. In a "post" earlier in this blog pointed two positions of judge worth as much as possible to minimize the creature if it becomes law. First, to authorize the order for delivery of data to identify the alleged violations of intellectual property, the referee may well Contentious-rather should - to require documentation proving you are given just cause and legitimate interest request for information and, since before the request can not be opposed, would also be reasonable that the judge did not authorize if it could not establish a probability sole discretion that there qualified breach of the law and such a relationship with destinarario violation of the requirement. Second position: if the administrative proceedings arising from the Second Section of the Intellectual Property Commission reaches the point where you decide to take action section, a judge should be allowed only worthy if you have been convinced of the certainty of the offense who would be the recipient and taxpayer of the measures.

I know that the "Law Sinde.2" does not say this and that with a good dose of absurdity and acriticism provides Judge weigh (weight limited to) the measures (as determined by management) in relation to respecting the fundamental rights of art. 20 CE: the so-called ideological freedoms "and the prohibition of seizure of publications, recordings and other media without judicial authorization. But, just as you can not think rationally, in the previous judicial authorization (of the request), the Judge is called comparsa legally officiate or automaton, but must be assumed to consent or not the order has to be governed by reasonable, for the second and decisive approval of the measures it must understand nor is the Judge for the mere act of affixing stamps of legitimacy without trial for their part, subject to acceptable legal parameters : whether to remove content or closing a "web" is to indicate the existence of violation of a right to judicial authorization because a seizure of publications, recordings and other media (aptdo. 5 of art. 20) kidnapped claimed that it not merely suspected of violating a law, but security or certainty of the violation of another fundamental right . Here, even in cases where no case of dissemination of ideas, thoughts and opinions (Aptdo. 1, point to the art. 20 CE) or disclosure (aptdo. 1, letter d of the art. 20 CE), it seems reasonable that these measures (similar to kidnapping) at least be justified by the some violation of intellectual property rights.

Finally, one other observation. In these instances of our politicians affect certain authors and certain industries, who want to continue negotiating with the music, for example, as they have been doing since the invention of the phonograph, more or less. But, in my opinion, decisive, with economic pressure be critical of these and other companies, is the lust for power and control and despotic mentality that long ago went beyond traditional ideological boundaries and theoretically diverse political positions and moved to countless people of all parties. No external economic pressures on the real example that I put on the Civil Register, nor in the internal control of the Justice reforms of 2003 and 2009. environmental authoritarianism is fed, even with an economic factor: the budget is managed and the money that can be mobilized is the real measure of power . Therefore, our political class is (although they can always be found within her individual exceptions) fully Concorde on the idea that the only power is the executive: the governments (national, regional, municipal) with their respective administrations. So we reached a purely formal rule of law, where the separation of powers and judicial independence are hollow words. Lawmakers rarely take themselves seriously (and not give them facilities, and unconstitutional infumable with party discipline and other mechanisms) and the Judges should be having them at bay while there are still some that are created independent of the true owners right to say and make the law, until they have been transformed, as is attempting with some success, into docile servants title, subject, as every single official, a clear chain of command. See the post on Sunday, February 6, 2011, "WE ARE A NATION THAT KNOWS stand and walk again" "THE REAL SPANISH NATION Prostration (I)":

This is the direct link: ; http://andresdelaoliva.blogspot.com/2011/02/somos-una-nacion-que-sabe-ponerse-en.html

Ultimately, determining all, a general debasement: to despise the freedom of others (starting with the thought and expression) and be willing to limit itself, exchanging with higher dimensions like what they call "quality of life." As this debasement is so widespread and entrenched, we see individuals with liberal shirt selling them as freedom advances in the most awful abuse.

Power Cost Pedestal Fan

ALREADY APPROVED" TO WIN THE ELECTION, THERE YOU DESERVE "(I)

merits and demerits of PSOE and PP

"MORE THAN 20 REASONS NOT TO VOTE FOR A W. AND NEITHER ONE VOTE FOR H."

(BY LAW, June 26, 2009)

D. José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero (ZP ) has said in Seville on February 13, 2011, a great truth, who heads the "post". But tell the truth as far from the fans and the dedication of ZP , transcribed words were "subordinate clause" other "main clause", which the great truth was turned into a simple post-election partisan political " Popular Party does not know that to win elections, we must deserve."

As post-election policy, the full sentence ZP, if not deceitful, because is plausible and likely that ignorance of the PP-is common and unfortunate to the extent implicitly throwing now they say "subliminal," but the subliminal is not the same as implicit - the idea , of the PSOE and the same self ZP deserve to win the elections (municipal and autonomous, first, the general, later.) And that idea today, it seems business affordable only for a few "fans" who always are.

That of "deserve," he said ZP on winning elections has been only a rhetorical device for persuasion (which is what this rhetoric) of potential voters. And has been to introduce, for the outcome of the election, the idea of \u200b\u200bmerit , which is a clear ethical implications . Merit implies something good, positive while demerit or merit no connotes something bad , negative. You can win a contest because you have the best curriculum or surpass brilliantly tests or because the best proposal (which deservedly win , Well cattle) or you win because you have godparents or friends (you win undeservedly , bad cattle). Win or with by merits is what should be . Winning, however, is simply what is , what happens, but that should not be , or win a competition of Legal Council of State and to win the competition of large public works.

At this point in our recent history that ZP ethical elements enter in their long speeches or in short phrases, is unlikely to change the widespread idea ZP as a subject quite amazing in terms of ethical concerns . This is no time, moreover, to try a little essay on what should determine an electoral victory. So I turn away from theorizing. What happens now is that many, also on the left and the PSOE itself, of course, consider ZP has earned not win the election, but lose . This is so is demonstrated by the insistence superlative, from within the PSOE, which ZP not a candidate. ZP also said in Seville, the day February 13, 2011, that speech PP is limited to five words: " the fault of Zapatero ." ZP may be right in limiting popular speech, but apparently has not dawned on me that recite the same speech every day hundreds of socialist leaders ( if we are so by ZP fault "," ZP is a catastrophe and it will load up the PSOE ", etc.). Some of those leaders who hold baronies, they are saying in public: " announced and if you follow or get out ... but do not ever go ."

right back directly on the forthcoming elections in Spain. First, go to the defense of ZP I announced in "post" of 6 February. not true that the blame for all y ZP is not fair that attribution of blame exclusive. They are wrong in the analysis of what happened in these years and those who commit injustice in the PSOE, the PP or outside of either party, throw all the blame on ZP. Remember obvious things: ZP not placed himself at the head of the PSOE . ZP PSOE is a product. (I feel the sadness that this will cause them to my good friends Socialists are not many, but they are good, but I see and things). is so clearly a product that PSOE, finished the race law (and without getting the position of Professor at the University of León, but now its "bio" official says otherwise) has done ZP in life other than a member of the PSOE . The PSOE delimited internal electoral prefer an alternative that does not qualify: or José Bono Martínez and José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero . Although recently, the "grand electors" of the PSOE appointed Secretary General of PSOE to José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero . He ran the PSOE the next election. And the PSOE well he was glad to win those elections of March 14, 2004 and returning to win the March 9, 2008, always with ZP as number one. " The number of militants or sympathizers designated PSOE ZP was and is simply incalculable. And ZP not designed or made by itself as a fact, not been alone, but very accompanied by all the PSOE, in their vociferous denials and omissions, especially those concerning the economic crisis. Guilt (all or most important) not only ZP: the PSOE will not be worth sacrificing a goat ZP or atoning or propitiatory . The PSOE ZP has supported its controversial legal reforms and their adventures more pernicious.

Some considerable time in solitude, does not take too long to realize what it was or who was actually ZP. In my article SHOE TO THE FEDERAL (ABC , October 7, 2005 ) said, inter alia, the following:

"It's a topic bound here in Spain is re-released the immediate post-Franco, Transition and the constitutional process, as if we were back in late 1975. That happens, of course, because some in power do not like the result of that piece of English history. And probably also want to, even unconsciously, have a distinct historical role in advancing day by day and formed a country. This phenomenon of "remake" baffles and disgusts many, he does not see sense and consider it positive. So, another issue arises: the Prime Minister does not know where it goes. "

" I think, on the contrary, what it does and what is proposed by Mr Zapatero is some "book." It happens, though, that this "book", which was discontinued, there was reissued before the last general election. But Mr Zapatero absolutely no intellectual substrate (in particular, ideological) and, of course, has a "book" and even a "map", although at 1/5.000.000 and outdated. "

"Mood and possibility aside, the Mr. Zapatero is a socialist and a radical federalist" book "politically incardinated (knowingly or not, anyway) in a certain sector of the protagonists of the Second Republic. So seriously probed direct reform of the English Constitution of 1978. So rather than be held hostage by Esquerra Republicana to retain power, in tune with Esquerra Republicana, as with the PNV. ETA understands why a substantial problem and primarily political. "

" Some minor episodes, instead of random errors due to signage or an Israeli florist, it may be more evidence of this. La Marcha Real, the official anthem of Spain, has been forgotten in acts of which he was responsible for the government of Mr Zapatero. And the constitutional flag of Spain red and yellow, has been absent from such acts. The last Conference of Presidents of the regions, also initially without that flag, seemed destined to stage the federal Spain, much more than solving the problem of health. "

After this first stage but the Given the polls, ZP , with the PSOE supporting him, the flag returned to constitutional and established the mantra (or ditty) the "Government of Spain " up in the soup.

Of the ultra Federalists ZP adventures together without reservation by the PSOE, I still occupied in 2005 (see SPAIN CAN CONTINUE TO BE A NATION? in ABC , November 17) and early 2006 (see ITS GETTING TO SPAIN CASILLAS (ABC , January 23) to conclude the undisguised inanity of CHAIRMAN (ABC , June 3, 2006 ):

"From the beginning of his parliamentary performance, I have taken known serious thought Mr Zapatero, instead of treating or contemptuously dismissive. I calmly read his words, which have been the object of my meditation. And I do not understand naturally faced with the first and, of course, not sharing enough of what he meant. " Shortly after he wrote this one paragraph:" about thought Mr Zapatero is crucial his sharp opposition between "the facts "and" words ". A risk that I consider unjust enemy of Mr. President, compels the conclusion that this opposition is that this prime minister suffers from intellectual futility undisguised, almost spectacular . "

I allowed the above self-citations make it because I care that I have not been accredited or inconsiderate a priori with ZP or delayed in the discovery of his intellectual and moral stature and shy or euphemistic in the criticism of his performance. It sat out the truth should peel and lirondo, namely that ZP has been and is a product the PSOE Factory. The PSOE Factory can now withdraw the product ZP market, but the responsibility for the damage is and should be attributed to the PSOE .

So yes, the current survey results show that, now, a majority of English ZP does not think deserves to win and he deserves neither the PSOE's because both have well deserved the verdict of major demerits, provisional verdict, but strong today.

"MORE THAN 20 REASONS NOT TO VOTE FOR A W. AND NEITHER ONE VOTE FOR H."

Another thing are the merits of CP win the next elections (municipal and regional first, the general, later.) If ZP, instead of saying what you said, I wanted to say what is being asserted by many, namely that the PP should not be considered to win on the basis that the PSOE lost, you are absolutely right.

on municipal and regional

I will not talk, because each municipality and each autonomous region differ considerably. But as for the general election and the merits of PP (the PP there, led by Rajoy ), I pointed out here many times my strong disagreement on issues I consider of utmost importance: Justice and authenticity rule of law is only one, but enough for my opinion and I think voting for the citizens attached to fundamental democratic values: equality before the law, effective protection against arbitrariness, submission of the public authorities law. Has been enormous damage that, by consensus with PSOE, PP has done and still may be, is about to be, if it contributes to the demise of the Courts of all types with the hoax of the "Courts Instance-simply devastating and virtually irreversible. the PP is awful reform the Organic Law of Judicial Power, perpetrated in 2003, culminating in the necessary cooperation for megareforma procedural law on the magical "judicial office" in 2009 . He also commented on this blog the silting of the PP in the offspring of the Intellectual Property Commission (vulgo "Sinde.2 Act"). No less serious is the involvement of PP in the dirt judicial policy: relations with judicial associations, the rules and practice of appointment and functioning of the CGPJ, corrupt and corrupting body, the greatest exponent of the "State Parties" , in the partisanship of the Constitutional Court, etc.. The subject-I know very well, disgusts me and saddens me a long time.

In terms of education and, more specifically, university, was the PP who (in the second and regrettable Aznar's second term) created and launched the ANECA , not a serious external evaluation of the merits of the teachers, but to implement some irrational and unfair methods, based on criteria largely wrong, that actually apply a number of officials, with support from teachers displayed as evaluators and are selected without transparency and without motivation, but that, with very few honorable exceptions (which determined its termination), the lean charge diets and enjoy the power that their position gives them. But it is also responsible for successive education in the PP (also with individual exceptions, they have cornered finish) have confused promote freedom in constitutional education with indifference, sometimes extreme, public schools. At university level, I know well, the PP has not stopped to oscillate between disinterest and nonsense.

So, the day February 13, 2011 , while ZP Seville uttered the words transcribed in the title of this "post", D. Mariano Rajoy in Santiago de Compostela, he said, according to Europa Press, Spain today has no "ideological but essentially a problem of competition " .

that Spain has a competition problem (of their rulers and leaders) is evident. It is more clear the problem of competition than competitiveness. But deny that Spain has "an ideological problem" seems to me, as a vision of Spain, acute cataracts in both eyes or be on the verge of a double retinal detachment. If Mr. Rajoy has not committed a slip of the tongue too fat, he could be considered non-existent, or, even worse, irrelevant to him and the PP-the set of problems it has created in Spain, all the social engineering the PSOE, although in engineering that have spent the most successful efforts of the PSOE and many millions of euros of all . Except slip of the tongue, which should clarify D. Mariano Rajoy (MR ) we would be saying that no ideological problem is the establishment everywhere from the tyranny of right (artistic, cultural, historical, political, etc.) in social interventionism the public authorities, in implementing the multi-faceted "gender ideology" and its derivatives known legislative , confusion in Establishment Clause of the State, religious freedom and anti-religious militancy (and, more precisely, anti-Catholic, because Islam or Confucianism not hinder them), in promoting the "rights" of the absolute sexuality, in public education of children in the immediate pursuit of such "rights" , policy extreme anti-natalist, the replacement of respect for the right to a dignified death for the promotion of euthanasia alleged by superior beings, judges of the dignity or indignity of life, e così via , Italians say.

This message reductive Mr Rajoy of Spain's problems is Demasié for my body and even my soul . I know this is not an intellectually rigorous critique, but rather Cheli but I do not think that the thesis of D. Mariano on the problems of Spain for more.

What we do anymore, and if not, read the next "post" - is the question of whether we vote for who deserves it or vote for nothing or we might as well have a reason to vote someone. I advance my conclusion: " the vote, for which it incurs ." Notice that this conclusion fundamentaré soon and I would advise, as a preparatory exercise, re-read post of June 26, 2009, entitled as stated in the previous subsections. Facilitated the link: http://andresdelaoliva.blogspot.com/2009/06/20-razones-para-no-votar-xy-ni-una.html .

Co Się Dzieje Z Cialem Po śmierci

" YOU KNOW WE PUT A NATION up and walk ", ie, lower wages and LOOTING OF SAVINGS

THE REAL SPANISH NATION Prostration (II)

WALKING WHERE THE BENEFIT OF "THE ECONOMY" ... INJURY AND NEARLY ALL OF U.S.

PRELIMINARY . Again the question: what makes a proceduralists getting into economy? And again I answer, even if it is procedural, I am also a citizen of two revalidation high school and University Foundation, plus a few books read and lived a few decades, the economic situation is the primary concern of the English and all my life I interested in what happens in Spain. And what happens, what is happening most important is the economic crisis and what is done by politicians and leaders during the economic crisis. I did not start this blog to talk only about issues and legal issues, having published over forty years, hundreds of articles and interviews in all media. I started and continue to say something about what happens in Spain. And if it's Zutano Mengano or next Rector of the Complutense, if Del Bosque must pay tribute to Real Madrid, where this TV is merged or not such other and even if ZP will be resubmitted as head of the PSOE list if you will Rubalcaba and even if the nationalist left is distinguished from true stories of ETA are compared with what is at stake on account of the economic crisis of the many millions of unemployed and many more people in dire . So try to understand what happens and then reporting and opinion. In addition, I offer you, as a lawyer, an observation that may be interested: note that what is at stake is not dependent on legal rules. The legal-legal-not necessarily have been created and will create in the light of decisions of power. power-political, and economic, often difficult to identify, has taken the lead . is the time of the decree-law and the absolute impairment of value of the budget, classic but outdated (in Spain, at least) key institution of tighter control of government by popular representation . The rule of law is a pipe dream for those marginal shots. Law (true) does not count. The solvency crisis (you understand it as you want: extreme illiquidity or inferiority of assets over liabilities) is not resolved under the Bankruptcy Act.

------------------------------------- To answer the questions with which ended the "post" above, should be put aside for the moment, the most important of the real exhaustion of Spain (which is what I tried in this "post" of 6 and 7 February) and focus on issues of economic crisis: Facts and measures adopted or announced. Although somewhat heavy, it makes sense to begin with, referring to the main factors of our economic reality. However, I'm not doing so, because a blog is not the means to edit short academic papers. What I will do is start at the end: I think they will do in the economic field our invaluable "leaders", once considered a danger away forced rescue, it would cost too much to the rescuers . Then at the end of this "post" summarize factors of the economic situation, hoping to understand that the early conclusion is not without solid foundations.

What I think they will do our "leaders" will produce, short and medium term , the following effects:

1 º) falling wages and purchasing power of the whole population. Operation initiated .

2 º) Decommissioning Savings, conversion of a few in Banks and acquisition (most likely by tender) by foreign creditors (banks) of the remaining are of interest. Enrichment of a few merits. Operation in progress .

3 º) Maximum way exploit any tax collection and increasing the tax burden that will fall on ordinary citizens . operation in progress, pending major improvements .

4 º) Public spending unchanged and apparently unalterable . Evidence .

5 º) public deficit unchanged and, apparently, unchanged. Conclusion obvious real factors.

6 º) Increasing public debt constant . Inescapable need leverage the state, with increasing debt .

effects in the medium to long term :

1 º) protracted crisis in the real economy , with high unemployment rates, consumption and production depressed housing unaffordable public discontent supine distraction maneuvers features secure but unimaginable, and so on. Neither I nor anyone else (Who has appeared: surely there is someone) we dare to go there (except I would guess that in the next section), since in a "crisis in L", is never clear the lower horizontal pole length, which may exceed that of the vertical.

2 º) recovery if possible, achieved by "leaders" a "good job market, we are colonized economically and foreign investment flows into . Too many variables beyond the control of Spain, would affect this " scenario", as he now says significant recovery from other countries, destabilizing alternative to Spain (influence on industrial investment and tourism), collapse or demystification of current "emerging" (China, for example), etc.

Let me explain a little more.

falling wages and declining purchasing power of the population of the Nation

snip addition to the remuneration functionary and the freezing of pensions, has already launched a large operation for common employees. Already purchased by the ZP Merkel recipe (or, rather, what he wanted or been able to understand the recipe). The launch of the idea was this: " should liquidate the relationship between wages and CPI " to go to a link between wages and competitiveness. First reaction: the Minister of Labour, the poor D. Valeriano Gómez , rejects the idea immediately, as a good trade unionist. But after 72 hours, as a good minister, begins to rectify and says something as steamy as this: "It is good that there is some relationship between how they evolve wages and prices" and " Spain, for about 30 years when wages are negotiated taking into account productivity "(note that, voluntarily or involuntarily, Gomez speaks of" productivity "instead of" competitiveness "). At first, CEOE also is shocked at the prospect of disappearing wage guarantee clauses (indexed to CPI) generally provided for in Spain for decades, collective agreements, to which the employer is well used. But after 72 hours, the CEOE , speaking through its Vice D. Arturo Fernandez, who had initially said that " competitiveness is a German theme " enthusiastically supports the idea of \u200b\u200b"wage-competitiveness." And the Bank of Spain (BoS) supports at full speed. And so does the International Monetary Fund and hundreds of experts (real or perceived) in newspapers in paper, digital, blogs, public appearances. The main unions are protesting with small mouth, delicious after obtaining financial compensation in 2010.

general dismantling of Savings Banks, permanence, like banks, only some and award a "third" of the "impractical" or "not viable".

About

financial institutions and banks, in particular, are data in the Annex at the end of this "post." But, in short, the reality is that at this time is thrown on the banks, and merged (through mergers cold or SIP), a huge pressure of demands, with the support of the great Bank (support, by the way, reminds me of the old things!, the prior and immediate expropriation offered RUMASA). As I write, the demands are just realize: v. Http://www.abc.es/20110209/economia/abci-gobierno-exige-capital-basico-201102092009.html

Those who do not meet the requirements, will be at the mercy of a body dominated by the political class specialized in economy (FROB : see Annex at the end of this "post"), decision maker viabilities and infeasibility and, ultimately, of awards (probably quite healthy after the boxes with the money of all.) I'm not making this up: in COUNTRY of February 9, 2011, Vds. found an interesting article that speaks plainly of "nationalized boxes" (or is it "nazionalizadas"?) and concludes: " The privatization of public holdings [which would be the FROB after intervention] in organizations will be made by a 'competitive process' ."

Link: http://www.elpais.com/articulo/economia/Gobierno/controlara/cajas/nacionalizadas/dan/credito/elpepieco/20110209elpepieco_3/Tes

I'm going to risk predicting -no I bet out of habit- to be German financial institutions, today creditors of English- boxes between the winners of the spoliation indirect Banks .

do not like this picture

No doubt the readers and I have draft and warn that I do not like that, compared to the epic zapateril of the Nation to know to get in standing and walking, I see that will be our paths. They were not wrong the discerning readers. But I must explain.

Do I feel any attachment or conceptual vital for collective bargaining and wage guarantee clauses based on the CPI index? No. defended here that the crisis provided the occasion to put in place to "trade union" and collective agreements negotiated with them for bargaining, more flexible, between the employer and the employees of the company. What happens is that, besides being very contentious and controversial (as the nation , but with immediate impact on millions of lives) that the ratio of wages in the competition (there is abundant literature on the subject), two realities indisputable

that 1) is here taken of this relationship, the only thing that seems clear, that is, the negative : eliminate wage indexation to the CPI while brings al fresco the positive side: establish how the relationship of wages fixed by competitiveness (and according to the productivity, even if it already exists for many English, beginning, very curious and abominably, by the Judges ).

2) that the salary reduction is not a priority action in relation to the crisis. And that turned into a priority, let alone in principal and almost only, the wage reduction, as well as indecent and obscene -if not immediately see the reason for these adjectives, then the explain, is the immediate consequence impoverishment, Spain, millions workers of all kinds, who have never had a level of pay as the major eurozone countries, but much lower. Moreover, this impoverishment may well end up conspiring in favor of a less competitive.

contraargumentario See an interesting , basic but worthwhile content in: http://www.pymesyautonomos.com/reflexiones/con-salarios-mas-bajos-seremos-mas-competitivos

indecency and obscenity on the topic of wage-competitiveness main reform: Earlier I said that ZP (And others) had bought part of the "recipe Merkel." Because, in truth, the Federal Chancellor, though very interested in the salary reduction in Spain, also said something else, like the golden rule: " not spend more than you earn ." Start (and probably end) for low-wage pay cut without reducing (beyond ridiculous tweaks) public spending, huge and run riot in the very special benefit political class, is not indecent to obscenity? Data deficit spending and Public in Annex at the end of "post."

is probably very likely even be necessary to stop automatically linking wages to the CPI and, as a result, be required next salary cut, highly painful. But what may be necessary is not always legitimate for anyone who promotes it (the political and economic leader) such as when placing it first (and only, probably) of the shares on the crisis. And when, despite the illegality and impropriety of such a reform in the real historical conditions or that is undertaken, is to carry out so is perfectly understandable that, quite rightly, the public strongly rejects.

same is true of the action on the savings banks. Necessary decisive action sanitation, depoliticization and clear accountability mechanisms, does not mean that it is fairly acceptable dark concrete operation is now underway, piloted by the Ministry of Economy and the big banks, with the invaluable momentum and applause from some of our most important foreign tutors.

What is really "get and walk "

" Get up and walk "mean, in short, three things, according ZP :

1 º) has absolutely no policy of its own and be willing to second dictate that, in order to save, because that is what matters-the "nail" policy that would be a "rescue" or a big attack "markets."

2 º) Encourage immediate impoverishment of the vast majority of the English , accepting eliminating wage indexation to CPI: with this, ZP exceed, in terms of impoverishment, any known English government and even to any of the various invaders of the Iberian Peninsula.

3 º) Allow, monitor and manage a operation of hasty (and unexpected) liquidation, nationalization and privatization of the Savings Bank, to liquidate some nationalize other and assign then to the undischarged . Handling all of them, with unknown parameters, but handling by a small group of people (the leaders of FROB). No one with experience should be offered the slightest doubt that this operation determine some increase in the number of rich, delicious .

Meanwhile, the trade union or resolve to survive on their fees and their own funds (as advised the union leader's companion Frau Merkel) and political parties are less willing to sacrifice themselves and their friends. The "means" in grave crisis, with little pluralism because of the limited concentrations than any liberal, left many of the essays in the hands of "scholars" and still waiting for aid from the political and economic leaders (read big banks). Entrepreneurs who own businesses do what they can. Sometimes I even succeed in the midst of such adverse conditions. But "business leaders" are unlikely to be entrepreneurs. Continued

Szerokopasmowa Antena Kf

" WE ARE A NATION THAT KNOWS get up and walk again "

Prostration THE NATION'S REAL SPANISH (I)
(updated to 7 February 2011)

On 2 February 2011, day of the Social and Economic Agreement (SEA) (note that it social comes before the economic , a subtle psoe ) was presented as a landmark similar to the "Moncloa Pacts." No one has explained the ASE, because it must be neat and evanescent literature equally: we only know about pensions and not to keep or expand. But that does not matter in this society of gestures and images that are obscured by the reality system, including painful and sordid. The grand gesture Social Agreement came on stage at the theater bombonera of La Moncloa, without direct viewers that the "claque" interested in the piece represented. Then came communication to the public in general, with a few images and text. But to round out the "mise en scène" immortalizing the beginning of the quest for economic and social recovery, it took a phrase from those who have been called lapidary. And Don José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, President of the "Government of Spain "thought he should say the words transcribed in the title, words in themselves beautiful, full of drama and hope. He thought they were words the president up to the historic moment when he uttered them.

I

to defend this man in a nearby "Post" because I feel bad injustices and the great injustices, very bad. It is a great injustice, as all big lies, the great lie of the moment, that Rodríguez Zapatero is evil, only evil, the only cause of the evils and the only hindrance to recover lost assets. But today plays reveal the great falsehood and injustice, but review and comment on these words (" We are a nation that knows how to stand and walk again "), words intended to be immortal and yet probably deadly enough and almost certainly mortifying mortuary or funeral ... and some tombstones.

Suddenly, "we are a nation " says Mr. Rodriguez Zapatero (ZP). Suddenly, after sitting or lying, ZP says this Nation stand know. " Suddenly, after being quiet, still, this nation known as ZP, " walk again."

Who ZP refers when he says that "we are a nation"? You mean perhaps to Spain? I think so, but what is considered perhaps ZP integrated into "the English nation" spoken of in the current Constitution English to assert their "indivisible unity" (Article 2)? Because, as already mentioned, the November 17, 2004 (not many years ago), Zapatero said, in defense of any other nation in the English territory that ' perhaps no other concept much discussed in theory and political science and constitutional as nation. " He was right to ZP: In the world of theory, "nation" is a debatable concept, of course (what would not?), And discussed. But that day in 2004, ZP no concepts debated in academic and scientific, but, as president of Government of Spain intervened in a political issue with constitutional dimensions, in defense of a particular policy option. He said rightly: " any law student knows that in our nation's Constitution, the term is restricted to the English nation ." ZP words last February 2, as such beautiful words, dramatic and hopeful, have gone unnoticed and, especially, have been met with complete indifference . Precisely because they have been pronounced ZP, one of mortals less suitable to build confidence and hope . The beautiful words in your mouth, have sounded epitaph.

But what concerns us now is not another of the countless lies and inconsistencies of ZP, which I personally consider him only entitled to belong to the " Alien Nation." Interestingly, in the politics of gestures and pictures, the English and worldwide (because there is also, of course, that policy and iconic gesture outside Spain), the number ASE-scene was staged for the number -scene quick but intense visit of Angela Merkel to the Town and Court. And while numbers happen comedy, occur in Spain and in the world, real things. Where do I get there is the comparison between the text of the script of our play, English, and the reality of the English nation, that one that the Constitution recognizes.

seems to me that the English nation still exists, yes. Many, unlike ZP, we can legitimately say "we are a nation " referring to Spain. But the second part, ie know that this nation stand up and walk again is far more problematic. To ZP, namely stand and walk again means, for the context of his sentence, which we do on pensions reform and, between that reform and other items, we will recover. I doubt it very much. To be more precise: I'm sure, because of the ASE and the truce that will give us the mysterious "markets", etc. Or we will wake up and begin to walk in the right direction.

Counterfeiting of social and democratic state of law, no government to govern or legislate popular representation and control.

Because the prostration is very serious national ultimately manifested in the extreme weakness of a fake social and democratic state of law , should be the decisive instrument for society that is considered Nation. The State only, in fact, the modus vivendi of many and the Methodus lucrandi a few . is because we lack a archidemostrado government, understood as machinery reasonable management of scarce resources and promoting measures for the benefit of that society or, which is equal to the benefit of the generality of its members, the English. The "Government of Spain " is, a long-sectarian social engineering machine and an object of desire, the highest object of lust for political class, the English, in their overwhelming majority, recognized as a major obstacle to the general interest. The Houses of Parliament not a representation of the people, but that political class, people all installed in positions individual and group pay the state offers its vast apparatus. Deputies and Senators are conditioned by their method of appointment and discipline exacerbated vote, which comes to making fun of the Constitution, art. 67.2 " Members of the Parliament will not respect the mandate " . None of the political class wants Representatives and Senators who may be considered, each representatives of the English people. control "government action" (art. 66.2 CE) remains in discussions ineffective. And so, in scope, applies to the "autonomous legislators."

And the "Judiciary", about to be deactivated and neutralized: resurrects the power unit and coordination of functions Franco

The Courts , hungry as ever and interfered politically and administratively, are at the end of a relentless siege that seeks to end the greatest obstacle to the arbitrary power and liquidate the guaranteed maximum rule of law and respect for the rights and freedoms. Among the judges and magistrates has been settled and a bad policy subclass, with an intense vocation of leadership, more effective every day, with the result that the whole of the Judiciary there is total confusion and a general loss of specific judicial identity. Given the undeniable crisis intensified our Justice a majority of our judges and magistrates is not that we do not mind going without : do not even realize that this is a very great and very serious problem national rather than the many problems they have (such as members of other "groups"), some problems that could well occur in a context lucid and generous, rather than show up as any other "claims" functionary .

So the "Power Judicial ", is now seriously in the process of conditioning and complete neutralization . And is that the" judiciary "or, more accurately, Judges and Magistrates in Courts , are the All that remains against the plague of corruption that has infected almost everything. So the political class will not stop until neutralize them, from without and from within. We'll see immediately how it intends to turn the courts, including them in a "collective" Instance Courts. Who is going to do? The Ministry of Justice, with the decisive support CP Mr Trillo-Figueroa (Federico) and the applause turned CGPJ (lighting largely by the same Mr. Trillo and condensate perfect resurrected power unit and the coordination of functions Franco), to complacency or indifference of the judicial associations, major venues and hotbeds of judicial policy subclass. It is sad that our independent judges and magistrates, in fact abused, they feel mistreated as officials and judges and magistrates on the verge of extinction. So, they see the next move , that they sell with specious arguments effectiveness and unity of approach . Not for effectiveness or (even less) for the unit criterion (a very well below that of judicial independence) requires courts to eliminate the system of judges engulf them in schools, someone will have to face, I say me and that's the key. Judges should not want more heads of any kind and to meet other criteria are simply a coffee with his immediate colleagues and use any case law database, as do the rest of mortals.

The political class omnipresent and prestige of the institutions

The English nation is subjected and their prey political class. It is a Nomenklatura not occupying positions under serious public selection processes consistent with the principles of merit and ability (the want to end processes). The members of the political class concerned, for special relationships, certain paid positions (all have been able to invent and to be followed up) in the areas of government (the regional governments as well) and government (government), but also the organization of political parties and trade unions supported with public funds. To enter and remain in the political class not necessary, not excellence, but even basic professional training, or know of something and, for certain levels, have some experience (good) into something. What is required is adherence control and lack of proof of membership, it is now called "low profile" because the "high profile" is not a good sign of uncritical obedience.

In this state of terminal decay of social and democratic state of law, a situation which is nothing but a discreet and disguised apotheosis of the "State party" is not surprising that in Spain there was no longer a single public institution with strong social prestige, generating trust and respect . Not only do not have governments or chambers and legislative assemblies, but they do not have the Constitutional Court let alone the General Council of the Judiciary , the greatest exponent of the constitutional state corruption at the hands of the class policy . The Supreme Court not hold in the small recovery and will help legislatively, sooner rather than later, to establish itself as a mere judicial spa dome, shattered by successive waves of CGPJ. The large bodies of the Administration continue its decline undisguised and all regulators invented in recent times have been and are being an unmitigated disaster, from the Bank of Spain (guilty of felony without number) to National Competition Commission (former Court of Competition), to other national and regional committees. Of the Royal Academies be saved perhaps some that are working quietly. The Professional Associations , who have failed to legitimize his questionable background privileged status, are generally corpses awaiting burial third party administrator. And you better not talk about the Universities because, although they exist in many islands with excellent research and teaching (comparable to the best of the world), which together have been shattered by the subclass educational policy (to that the poor performance of its plans to bring them fresh) and the psycho-pedagogical alliance nonsense "Bologna", which have delivered in the absence of brain refurbished, modern right allegedly leftist and our room: the "Government of Spain" and some of and sickle martini.

A large operators and the "fourth estate " I prefer to refer to another post. Just will advance to the universities, with being as they are, seem peaks of excellence compared to the quagmire of macroeconomics and the state of " media."

Any of the above statements we can profusely illustrated ad nauseam. I am not look like spoilers or croaker. Do not make the slightest catastrophism. I simply refuse to hide or disguise a catastrophe that I have not contributed. If it hurts to read what I wrote, believe me, it hurts even more having to write .

So, suppose that is true something that is (almost obviously) false, namely that our main problem is the economic crisis. It is urgent, indeed, not destroy more jobs but to create it. But that will make small and medium businesses, despite the Government, Parliament and the judiciary, if gives them some breathing room. But the prestige of the "Mark Spain," trust "the markets" international public deficit, is going to be arranged by the measures now, pushed, forced or converted, leads this "Government of Spain, with or without the support of the PP, CiU, CCOO, UGT, etc..? Does the ASE, the occasion of the words discussed, and have the other measures taken or announced (the action on the savings banks, the "pact on competitiveness," European, etc.). A power which allows us to think in a nation, Spain able to stand up and walk way? I love

wrong, but do not see it. I'll explain when I can.