Saturday, March 26, 2011

The Discus Thrower And Greek Values

A MISUNDERSTANDING AND ANOTHER JUDGEMENT JUDGEMENT INCOMPREHENSIBLE (I)


JUDGEMENT misleading: "THE CUCKOO", ACQUITTED OF MURDER AND RAPE BY SEVERE FAILURE OF FISCAL


Very large and widespread outrage in Spain has produced a minor, " The Cuco, "was convicted solely of concealment (three years in detention, much of which is considered as completed, for" El Cuco "was provisionally admitted), but has been acquitted of charges of murder and rape of the young Marta del Castillo, Seville, 17, missing on January 24, 2009. For Marta Castle is one of the most notorious crimes of recent years have contributed to various circumstances: Marta was searched for days hoping to find her alive and there were many expressions of solidarity. On February 14, 2009, Miguel Carcano, Marta former boyfriend confessed to raping and killing, then disposing of the corpse. From the moment of confession, were carried out body searches at different places, but until now has been found. And this case, along with a little time before, has sparked a debate over criminal legal treatment of minor criminal matters, we will not go into here.

For non-English or English readers not familiar with our law, it should be noted that, for "El Cuco" for a minor criminal, has taken a special criminal provided in the call Juvenile , where instruction (phase pre-trial investigation) does not apply to a judge, but the prosecutor (or Attorney General) (MF) and, if it comes to bringing charges, phase trial and sentencing is a matter of a juvenile court judge. It is the sentence of March 24, 2011, of Judge of Juvenile Sevilla, which interests us now. For those involved, older age, is still another ordinary criminal process, currently under trial before the Audiencia Provincial de Sevilla .

In the ruling against "El Cuco" have raised many angry voices and even some blunt editorial comment, that comment later. Well the Juvenile Judge of Seville has given, in my opinion, a good sentence, lawful, as it should be. The big test against "El Cuco" about the murder and rape of Martha Castle was one of the many statements by the ex-boyfriend of Marta, the so Miguel Carcano, made before the examining magistrate of the regular process that follows the adult defendants. Under large and strong case, both the Supreme Court and the Constitutional , if you wanted that incriminating statement "El Cuco" had probative value against "El Cuco" should have been made so that "The Cuckoo" ( through his attorney) would have intervened . And it was the defense of "El Cuco" that opportunity. It is certainly true that "The Cuckoo" was not a party to the regular process against age in which Carcaño said. But I think he's right the Juvenile Judge of Seville when the prosecutor accused juvenile has been limited to present a certified copy ("witness") Carcaño the declaration of the regular process , without attempting even get a statement Carcano in the process of children from "The Cuckoo", so that the child's lawyer could intervene. The Chief Prosecutor of Sevilla he was "disappointed" and has made quite extensive statements on the ruling, it will appeal, but, significantly, has been kept very much hard object to the Magistrate's rebuke to the Juvenile Prosecutor. Neither argument minimal compared to the many pages of Judge of the Office blunder of even a brief mention of disagreement with the arguments of Judge.

Moreover, it also has quite rightly Juvenile Magistrate stating that statements that incriminate a co-author of another co-author always has to be assessed with caution. Criterion is strong case law and doctrine, in Spain and outside Spain. And it turns out Carcaño has NINE different statements about the facts, THREE SIX to the police and to the ordinary judicial process still pending. In those statements, varies substantially Carcaño version of events: in the first three, to the police, and in the first two, before Judge (van FIVE), sole author declares Carcaño murder. In the third statement to the judge, Carcaño change his story and attributed to "El Cuco" rape and murder of Marta del Castillo, events in which he says is threatened by the child with a knife, would not have participated. In a subsequent statement of March 17, 2009, also before the Court is ratified in this version (and this is the statement that the Office of Child takes the process of children as main incriminating piece "The Cuckoo") (van SEVEN statements). But then , on two different occasions , Carcaño again declared, provided to the magistrate sole author of the murder: the role of "El Cuco" would again, as Carcano, that of masking, for having commissioned, with another adult, to dispel the body of poor Martha. Ie seven times, compared to two, had pleaded Carcaño sole author of the rape and murder : Marta killed on hitting head with an ashtray. Twice Carcaño blame-and it would have been "El Cuco" who killed Martha strangled with an extension cord .

Can you blame the judge to affirm the credibility of Carcaño low and did not seem enough to convict? Can he be criticized for, on that line, bring up, explaining, possible motives of revenge and resentment for changing Carcaño against "El Cuco"? And note that these considerations Judge formula for the sake , because the error above and the prosecution to purpose of Carcaño statement of March 17, 2009, was sufficient to deprive of value to this key piece of the prosecution.

In my opinion, the Magistrate Judge, author of a very decent sentence, is receiving some stick do not deserve, because it has been in the trance forced to apply rules that he has not been invented and that, in themselves, are reasonable. By extension, it lashes back against judges and magistrates in general (from "Justice" English). And, as on many other occasions, the prosecutor, get rid , no longer any legal liability -The legal regime against which I cry for years, shielding the MF, in contrast to the Judges and Magistrates, " but also social responsibility , because the behavior of MF can not even be criticized for citizens, since news and especially headlines that "the media" the present , refers only to "bug" or part of the sentence (conviction or acquittal) . "The media" could well refer to the "failure" and his justification , but that, apparently, is asking too much. A newspaper seriously I have for a few days ago published a small editorial I play:

"there was no justice"

"Beyond the strict application of the law and above technical considerations legal justice, by definition, has to do honor to his name. Justice will not compensate in any pain for the murder of a daughter, but at least it should serve as a repair, in part, the suffering of parents. The acquittal of the "Cuckoo" the crimes of murder and rape in the case of young Marta del Castillo may be technically under the law, but if so-which is debatable, the rule is unfair and the sentence that emanates from it, reprehensible. "

come here to argue - quite surprisingly to me, because that is not the main thrust of this paper, firstly, that the rules of evidence, presumption of innocence and basic guarantees are "technical and legal considerations" that should yield to the so-called "material justice" and, secondly , that a ruling "technically under the law" is, what is of acquittal, "reprehensible." I can not disagree more: first, it is unacceptable that legal rules that protect us all presented as " tecnicalities " technicalities (clear resonance term with negative) that lawyers manipulated to deny justice. To do justice worthy of the name can not be dispensed or the "strict application of the law" (it is a strict interpretation which must be done within a criminal proceeding) nor go over the badly called "technical and legal considerations." Finally, if the sentence is "under the law" (to the penal and procedural, in this case), Case can not be "reprehensible", though it is the law that the judge must comply. Judgments based on laws can be reprehensible unfortunate, but then, to be fair to those who dictate (and, apparently, Justice is the concern), we must clarify that it regretted the outcome, but without can fail who has had no choice but to reach it.

not the latter, on the other hand, if the ruling of the Juvenile Judge of Seville. The sentence, as is the acquittal, does not apply an unjust law, but fair: the prosecution must prove seriously, valid evidence, that what is charged. Convictions in criminal proceedings can not be based on the belief-often poorly social-established that the defendants are care items, however heinous crime and has been great the pain of its direct victims, as in the case of Marta del Castillo.

may be wrong my legal-procedural approach to the absence of valid evidence underlying the indictment of "The Cuckoo." There has been an approach made lightly, but I leave a link to read the full sentence, judge for themselves and to contrast my view:

http://www.elpais.com/elpaismedia/ultimahora/media/201103/24/sociedad/20110324elpepusoc_1_Pes_PDF.pdf

In any case, it is clear that not suffer an alienation that leads me to consider perfect defensible, always, what any court decides. Not so and in an upcoming "post" I will do another sentence, unknown and, therefore, not criticized. The case is interesting and the sentence, and advancement, it seems incredibly unreasonable. It is what might be called "the case of falsifying court, he did not commit the crime of forgery."

Sunday, March 20, 2011

How To Darken The Leather Of A Louie Vuitton Bag

LIBYA: Dust ELECTION WAR, LATE, bewildered and URGE THAT UNCONTROLLED


While on Your BARULLO , INCREASE OUR DEBT AND OUR PUBLIC SPENDING
(Updated to March 23, 2011, 2345 hours)


With umbrella political of resolution 1973 the Security Council of the UN, without agreement in NATO, Sarkozy , Obama and Cameron (more Rodriguez Zapatero and other junior partners) have intervened in Libya by air (by bombing and missiles). There was nobody who did not think that the operation was delayed if the goal, as in Kosovo , was, according to UN humanitarian essentially, that Gaddafi no more slaughter their countrymen. The intervention limited its effectiveness to prevent a return Gaddafi using its aircraft, but had not prevented the slaughter of several days ago, due to the successful counterattack of the tyrant to the gates of Benghazi, not avoid that, as was the case and still occurs, continue attacking Gaddafi other objects and causing more casualties among the Libyan population. It seemed and seems clearly willing to do so long as it arms and soldiers.

The no-fly zone is no small thing, but French and British planes since the beginning exceeded the provisions of resolution 1973 UN Security Council, which sets limited goals: zone and air protection and assistance of civilians, with the express prohibition of invasion and any occupation. V., stakeholders, the whole resolution:


Zone of fly supposed to dominate the sky on Libya. To this end, planes and missiles to attack Westerners could justifiably airports, radar installations and air defenses in the hands of Gadhafi , but on Sunday 20 March 2011 we also spoke of bombings against targets (in Benghazi and Tripoli ) not related to the air domain and the result of significant number of deaths, which even states involving only forces Gaddafi. Since the UN resolution explicitly recognizes "the important role Arab League " is interesting as declared from the first, the Secretary General of the League, Amro Musa :

" What happened in Libya is different from the purpose of imposing a no-fly zone, we want to protect civilians and not bomb more civilians. " Referring only to the initial attack, Musa said it in a joint press conference with President of the European Parliament, Jerzy Buzek, the Arab League headquarters in Cairo.

THE HUMANITARIAN military intervention and LIBYA .- KOSOVO . In 1999, to prevent further slaughter of Kosovars at the hands of Milosevic Serbs, the NATO bombarded for months a part of the former Yugoslavia , to force negotiations, which later failed. In June 1999, reached the Kosovo KFOR , a set of troops from nations in league, in order to pacify and administer the zone. And, after ruining the bombing Serbia, the Milosevic regime falling over. But there are a couple of very striking data: Kosovo , free (no official English recognition, but with the U.S.) in 2008, has an area of \u200b\u200b10,887 km ² . Serbia with Kosovo included, occupies 88,361 km ² . When bombed Serbia, Kosovo had not victims. In Libya, the two sides fight over the same territory and Libya sum 1,759,540 km2, a vast desert, cities, industry (oil) and agriculture concentrated in the coastal strip, which together cover more than 1700 kilometers in length. Did the "humanitarian intervention" in 1999 something to do with Libya? Libya could not have anything like the KFOR, even if the UN agreed to new resolutions that would allow action on the ground. And, it is known, no -Starting with the United States, wants to intervene on the ground Libyan .

In short: the fly zone in Libya was very important for 10 or 13 days to avoid the advances of Gaddafi and give victory to the opposition forces . On Sunday 20 and Wednesday March 23, 2011 , however, is of limited relevance and Gaddafi may allow stay in power. A UN resolution aimed at 1) the fly Gaddafi, 2) prevent further deaths of civilians, 3) allow evacuation and 4) the arrival humanitarian aid to Libya is now , a paper with three purposes impossible (the ends 2, 3 and 4) . there anything else that I should not forget and do not forget the past day 20, the arms embargo Qaddafi, and ordered five years ago and not played by a few countries. Maybe now to prevent the rearming of Qaddafi, but nobody knows how many weapons and ammunition remaining. As Qaddafi is not the limit (which is unlikely), there is war in Libya for a long time. -A war we must now add, that one of two : or "allies" behold from the air or in which intervene in the air, outside the framework established by the UN and non-combatant casualties very likely . latter seems to be what is happening in the last hours . would seem that the military commanders of the countries involved have dispensed with the UN .

This was the global performance of the West, March 20, 2011: passivity, while it looked like Gaddafi lost. Tardy , when Gadhafi began to fight with success . The military action seemed day 20 a mere political gesture, with the sound of many planes and ships . But, as one perceptive commentator (who also writes very well), if Gaddafi end up staying, some governments had to save face politically citizens and could renegotiate the oil without having to Gaddafi something against the tyrant . Sarkozy , moreover, was and is very low hours, with approval ratings lower than Le Pen's daughter (although such things happen in France and then returning water to rivers). And ZP there is little to say in terms of popularity. Announced that there would be photos, but its effect me malice for the portraits will not be as great as you think. The English do not believe in ZP. And I see no signs that more pictures of our Minister of Defence, Carme Chacón , will catapult the leadership Spain, with full support of their prior forgetting (" Rubianes Tots som) and intolerant of repeated rudeness of artist.

What paint a pair of English ships and five aircraft in that scenario? On March 20, 2011, I seemed that they did not paint anything except help to lock the arms embargo is effective. But for the latter, the American ships, English and French would be enough, because we are not in the Indian Ocean. In relation to the humanitarian objectives adopted by the UN, our military despligue said on 20 - was and is of very little use and is for Spain new spending, this country can not afford . Spain is now the country in the world should spend less . If only not to contradict international commitments austerity, promises solemnly made before a huge debt and with a questionable will to reduce it. Our creditors have seen that here is not just a single euro government spending, neither the State nor the Autonomous Communities and the Municipalities. The serious doubts about the persistence in the waste of the English rulers will have become certainties that are not amended. There continue to be reasons for us to address it to the voracity of the "coconut markets" and are renewing fears that we rescued . In the opinion of serious people, no exaggeration in the phrase Roig, the "boss" of Mercadona " only good thing about 2011 is that 2012 will be better ." And we are facing, like it or not, that Ms. Angela Merkel , who abstained in the UN , us reconsider economically. What prudence of ZP!

on a crucial aspect of our economic situation, I recommend reading "The Big Lie", article by Carlos Sanchez in "Confidential": http://www.elconfidencial.com/mientras-tanto/2011/mentira- sector-real estate-20110320-7138.html
----------------------------------------------
UPDATE TO 23 MARCH 2345 2011 :

OVERFLOW AREA COUNCIL RESOLUTION 1973 OF THE UN SECURITY . Things have continued to occur and, unfortunately, the events seem to confirm the impressions of three days ago. There are a number of aircraft from different nations to monitor the perimeter of the zone and other flying Libyan airspace and attacking targets varied. For the countries involved are called "allies." To begin, these "allies" want to end about Gaddafi, and Gaddafi's the big deal, right? - and others reject, even with great forcefulness, which Gaddafi is the goal . The American military command-provisional, non-formalized-not to keep sending. U.S. and other countries want the NATO command have it. France is opposed to blunt the NATO command mode and even explained why: if the role is of the NATO talks on everything from military action, inflexible and poorly presented to the Arab world. Not bad this argument (which Spain has joined, by the mouth of the Minister Jiménez), which must be added atavistic and tilt the French to think that Africa is "a matter of France" (and France, in effect, has important military bases in Africa.) At present, there is disagreement in NATO and exhibits Obama rush increasingly cede "control" and visibly move the background. A senior British military commander has just proclaimed that Gaddafi's air force and virtually no . Ergo , killing Gaddafi Libyans can only go by land (and also seeing how they kill some of his followers, because the armed uprising in Libya is not at all similar to the popular movements Egypt, Tunisia and Bahrain). But the UN does not want land to be involved and nobody seems to want to intervene (as it is fed understandable). Ergo , enough to continue to monitor the airspace and sea, to arms that Gaddafi has not received even less, new aircraft . Thus, it seems, an end or at least, full stop, the foreign war episode on Libya. But that would be well, or so it might be, without knowing how much you would take the lock . And how long is a stream of dollars or euros. And no one-least of us, is for those joys. And, moreover, limited to blocking and action but would really doubt if there were a few "allies" Western, with some accompanying "Arab", which acted to fulfill a specific UN mandate . But that's not what happens. What happens is a pluralistic and free concert attack with airplanes, the vast majority: Americans and the French-bombarding tanks and buildings, while others are prohibited, and even that is the case of aircraft return to base without bombing targets (by whom?) because of well-founded fear of causing civilian casualties. So what is there is a noise of war without charge, without clearly defined objectives and accepted by the "allies" and without duration. uncontrolled For if this reality was not visible, Ms. Angela Merkel has withdrawn today's "theater" of Libya to the German military in charge of monitoring air, sending them to Afghanistan.

It is a test of global dislocation . It is an improvisation in which unsound, even if it is supported almost unanimously by Congress (lest voters think that Gaddafi supports), Spain does not paint anything. Log in a war there to think very well, although "the cause" is fair and intention, optimal . But enter a war without goals, you do not think about anything reject outright. So far the reasoning, but it happens, though, that the flights of our F-18 (the twists and turns) and to increase our submarine periscope can take minutes for news of our plural TVs. Ms. Carme Chacón harangue to the sailors of the frigate Méndez Núñez " saying they will protect the Libyan tyrant . And Don José Blanco said solemnly, "we will liberate the Libyans" (although no has asked Libyan us, because they have not Gaddafi's opponents). What true humanitarianism are serving?

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Euro Steam Professional System

European Energy Commissioner, Günther Oettinger, LIBYA


OR TERMINATION OF THE COMMISSIONER OR SERVICE COMMISSION TO AVOID THE "REVELATION"


Günther Oettinger, EU Commissioner for Energy, is trying earn a salary with an accelerated work on the last day on the Apocalypse and previous disasters. There is a specialist in biblical exegesis or a televangelist Reverend. But with his law studies and his long political career in the CDU (From Young, as is Mandaa : Now is "ex-young" (see in this blog the "post" of March 10, 2011), Günther Oettinger has been in these days, and seems determined to continue be so-the most powerful analyst of what happens at the Fukushima nuclear plant. The definition of the situation in Japan as "apocalypse", not only has made its media, but according to the same Oettinger, who plays a double role in the film (the author and critic of the author) has been the most accurate and precise expression of what has happened and is happening in Japan. Not content with the analysis, Oettinger also exerts prophet and judge : predicts what will happen (" between disaster and catastrophe great," said a few hours ago, clairvoyant him) and gives verdicts. The last is "lack of professionalism Japanese ." Not long before, was the first and only blame the "loss of control ." Has missed only reproach earthquakes and tsunami.

The story of this character, born on October 15, 1953, is a professional politician who has just parked Europe after a charge to reach President (Minister-Präsident ) of Land of Baden-Württemberg , which is no small thing. Consider what happened to Herr Oettinger. In this subject had preceded him as president of Baden-Württemberg, in 1966, Herr Doktor Hans Karl Filbinger , which was uncovered in 1972 a major Nazi past and a legal-judicial action reprehensible in the German Navy under the Third Reich . The " Filbinger affair, which culminated, but not its end-to resign as President of the said Land in 1978, it was revealed after the Berlin Wall and the retrieval of documents, as a matter particularly dirty, at least some tricks and manipulations by the Stasi . But what is more interesting now is that the Oettinger listísimo in Filbinger funeral on 11 April 2007, included in his blunt eulogy exculpatory statements, which raised huge clouds of dust, in remembrance of included Angela Merkel and Herr further hesitation Oettinger (first, "I stand by", then "there have been misunderstandings," etc...) Herr path Oettinger records other significant personal events, but although they are public, they do grace of them, then just add some strokes to qualify his portrait.

However, no doubt that this "brilliant ex-young" was the subject of a "sidekick " (method of promotion-removal described in " The Peter Principle ) to the EU and the European Commission and German politics section, not just his words control. is, pure, traditional, for largemouth . It all fits: now, before the natural disasters of earthquakes and tsunamis in Japan, it seems that neither the magnitude and strength of these phenomena and the subsequent destruction and death drew particular attention to Oettinger, but saw heaven opened, as they say, at such time to regain his favorite hobby of atrocities that , for which, innegablente, is well equipped because of their low skills. It happens that in this case, there have been imprudent domestic policies, but an egregious disregard of reality terraqueous with serious affronts to whole of Japan, in particular, for whom there work in harsh conditions. The atrocities of Herr Oettinger, revealing a supine ignorance, a mega-ego a painful disease and moral misery, should lead to his termination as Commissioner. A fool genuinely global , which also becomes eschatological, not really handle the res publica . If you have any dignity, assumed for purposes merely rhetorical, for he has shown a lack of it, Oettinger, so ready and as prepared , have already flown without delay Fukushima, either to record their acertadísimos criteria of action, which would recover the control and avoid the "apocalypse" or, more modestly, to relieve the exhausted workers struggling to extinguish fires and cool reactors.

What I want to post this is that no one can say that there has been a European who ask for the resignation of this subject . mail from this little corner Oettinger ask Herr resign. And improbabilities as to ask, I alternatively the President of the Commission, Mr Barroso, who cessation. Or at least send it, just as Commissioner, seconded the Fukushima Prefecture, Tohoku Region, Honshu Island, Japan, until the situation is no longer there apocalyptic, catastrophic and uncontrolled . If what commissions Barroso support (alone, talking to himself, because they have no time or inclination to listen to their occurrence) or to remove debris and refuse Oettinger, you can always terminat-ing for disobedience, without setting a precedent that will cease to whom says big nonsense. Indeed, it would be a dangerous precedent in world politics.

Here is the link to an excellent commentary Charo Zarzalejos , entitled " The lone almond Japan." For content and form, a pleasure and comfort reading:

Monday, March 14, 2011

Canadian Siezure Auctions

FLY TO JAPAN AND JAPAN IN OUR HOUSES MORE ON POLITICAL


TWO DIFFERENT DISASTER: LESSONS TWO DIFFERENT
(update March 15, 2011, 2330)


quite mysterious offers English reality for one to get into the realities of other continents. But this is not a "blog" specialized and would rarely ignore, or give the impression of being oblivious, terrible events, which just by its size and importance, we are present and immediate, also in subjective closeness to local events.

goes without saying that the Islamic world to me mysterious, strange and, therefore, subjectively far away. Islam few things I see clear, but not now come to mind. Now it is striking developments in several countries usually little news and that prevented massive killing of two of these countries, Tunisia and Egypt , the status of the zone seem catastrophic to stop the armed conflict in Libya , accompanied by disturbing episodes that occur here and there, but always with a certain geographical proximity. That is one hundred percent human catastrophe, although it is difficult or impossible to determine the different contributory causes. While in the Far East, in Japan, there has been no human catastrophe as a result of the tectonic plates collide and tend to overlap. Catastrophe human of Islamic countries has very deep roots, difficult diagnosis and treatment rather than problematic, not from outside (outside untreated, it seems) but from within these societies . The great catastrophe natural exceed of Japan, however, the human element . In any case, both disasters have something in common, purely external, are in these days of instant global communication (and in many ways, always precarious, should not forget), realities that are introduced into our homes.

HUMAN CATASTROPHE IN LIBYA : NEEDED AREAS OF EXCLUSION OF TYRANTS

After the events of Tunisia and Egypt , we live in "a minute" for a media effort that have gone through the media to an almost underground, Libya revolt against Gaddafi is now what it is at all times. The uncertainties on Tunisia and Egypt (with the addition of Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Yemen, Sudan, etc.) Are partners to those of Libya, but these days there is only news of Libya, where a civil war a crushing of the rebellion (depending on your point of view) with the tremendous noise and glare own relentless death. The media seems to care at the most phenomenal, what best can be seen and heard, to which most sensory impact. I suspect that this selection of news not only because of the greater difficulty of monitoring what happens outside the public in Tunisia and Egypt, and will surely be too sensuously perceptible, although more effort with better qualified - but also the belief that the customers of the "media" as preferred spectacular, though not the most important. So that, between them and other factors, all "Arab countries" with internal turbulence (all important), only continue to receive pictures and news from Libya. For now, that's all spectacular and worthy of attention media.

Remarkable
I think, on the political and social upheaval of the Islamic world, the new ruling that is now called " intelligence" and formerly known as " information services" (more espionage , pure and simple) (as always, the former names were more modest and accurate and modern, so pompous and inaccurate and ridiculous). The "intelligence " Western (is ie the U.S., Britain and continental Europe) has been decidedly silly . Not only did not know anything that could not be simmering without any outward sign, but there have been gaffes so glaring as the Secretary of the Foreign Office, which announced the move as news Gaddafi to Venezuela. And in this area as in others more modest (headlights, pay at supermarkets, Justice, etc), the "leaders" of all parties are endeavoring to replace (not supplement, replace) the "human factor" (the book of Graham Greene , the works of Le Carré ) for technology, aerospace, electronics, computer science. And so, without people on the ground, only to find out what crosses the ether or what the satellite photograph (the play: there are people who believe everything that appears in the film and think that everyone has provided over one or more satellites): in any case, such automatic information that no one can "process."

Gaddafi is by far the more ludicrous and undisguised dictatorship of the top three countries in crisis, less disguised tyrant, the most strident. And Libya lacked and lacks a remotely political structure comparable to that of Tunisia and Egypt. However, by the mysteries of "realism" of international politics, Qaddafi has been the "leader" most traveled and most shamefully feted by Western leaders, including English.

Perhaps because you have read the young-and after-reread some classics, never crossed my head the export of democracy. What democracy in Afghanistan be comical if it had already cost so many lives . But one thing is not to impose democracy and quite another, reirles the Thanks to the tyrants and assemble the tents democratic territory. Now, with Gaddafi , Western leaders talk about not knowing what to do. And the EU, with 27 speakers, which has been the palm of quackery: Obama has also made his statements, but rather to criticize him for his silence. All doubt (normal: the situation is very complicated), all except Rodríguez Zapatero (ZP), which, without hesitation, sent English troops in the wilderness where agreed tribalized UN or something. But if ZP is certainly not because by sending English troops to Libya would not be thinking or Libya or soldiers English, but raise more dust here.

Perhaps in Libya can not now do much from the outside. You can certainly do in order not to feed more Gadafis. As it could not present the world as normal to Tunisian Ali Ben or Hosni Mubarak Egyptian expelled both from the Socialist International almost posthumously. thing about the "strange bedfellows " should have a limit: if not for decency and dignity, at least for the pragamatismo who is advising experience. If they had created "zones" policy would not be asking now fly zone to neutralize Gaddafi.

NATURAL CATASTROPHE OF JAPAN, THE POWER HUMAN AND WESTERN GREAT DANGER (STRICTLY HUMAN ) LOSING THE REASON, THE VIEW AND MORE SENSE ELEMENTAL

We got to Japan in our homes. It has achieved a violent earthquake, something from nature, not politics or ideology. But, with the invaluable help of some "media" in the West are able to politicize the earthquakes and tsunamis. And of course our "leaders" are capable of behaving, in fact, they are doing, from German to French, to "commissioners" Europeans "as if the country suffered an earthquake of maximum intensity (and 40 more very respectable) and a terrible earthquake was the cause or blame for these phenomena .

Japan is an immense tragedy, no matter what happens with nuclear power plants crisis. generically argue on nuclear plant safety in view of what happened to the affected for a few earthquakes of intensity, duration and responses as those suffered by the Japanese, from day 11 until now, I think, all things considered, somewhat, not because of lack wisdom, but mentecatez hard to beat, with total loss of perspective (historical, geographical, geological, etc.). . Because you are trying to risks "ordinary" nuclear power compared to what happened in one of the highest seismic risk with the land and because the fourth most powerful earthquake in history known human . It is so foolish as to raise the risks of nuclear event of collision with the planet of a huge meteorite. to see if they find these cretins for what happened. Because, inexplicably, even to see and hear, do not learn . Initially told that the entire Henshu Island (the main group and the most affected by the earthquake and tsunami) moved 2.4 meters and the axis of the earth itself may have moved 10 centimeters. Now change the numbers, but did not decrease.

[I just wrote that, "inexplicably " mostly idiots half the world leaders " not hear. "I did not say it: is perfectly understandable that these fools Bible (in the Bible is speaking more and more clear about the foolishness), half the world governing -no exaggeration: think in which, by act or omission, have mounted the global economic crisis, deceived and misled by letting the brains of creative financial - not know at all : even something as visible and noisy (more is unthinkable) as a 9 earthquake and a tsunami with waves of 10 meter starts running at 500 km. per hour. French authorities, who repeat, in a tone of reproach, that "the Japanese have lost control" (as if they are deemed able to not lose it, perhaps because it would prevent earthquakes and tsunamis), as well as the tontucio European who speaks of "Revelation " and it feels great to have found a historical statement, belong to the subspecies, abundant, of biblical fools ready past. So they are fools slime. we noticed not too far, but is fully in these historical trances where strips around Folly costume and is presented in its true giant. The real heroes, anonymous and silent, are dying for men. The genuine heroes do not stop to think at the maximum pressure and to work tirelessly, while important , sound asleep and in good armchairs, pontificate the first thing you think of . And, indeed, it is not surprising because it is in those rare occasions when you always look the wretched and foolish giving all the notes of the scale, the "do" to "yes" all tune, and showing his real intellectual and moral stature, tiny. Like the popular television commentator in the USA who was pleased, yes, well, was pleased "that the costs of Japan what appeared to be more human that economic . For once, the English leaders have not (not being) a of mentecatez champions: the way things are. The European Commission, however, that set of wise not to go tumbling to the financial crisis widened, improvisations, fulminating miserably in Japan, "have lost control, "he said in Brussels. let us see them!. Although, honestly, better not. I do not like to see the" control "of the French leaders in this case very" courageous mice "- to an earthquake intensity of 9 degrees to one hundred miles off the south coast of Britain, for example. I admire France, but not so much their" leaders "today.]

Despite the astonishing ; strength of hundreds of thousands of buildings, calculated and constructed adequately to specific hazards, there are thousands of deaths and tremendous devastation: the first numbers, we still have them- been checked and counted dead. That, and the hardships that lie ahead, is what else should matter now. In a consensus that there should be indissoluble. But no, our leaders are busy demand accountability. In demand accountability by an earthquake of grade 9 to 30 to 40 earthquakes, many of them from grade 6 up ! And some "media" so-called "communication" (just read some important) inserted a holder wondering if could not be foreseen the catastrophe ! I ask these sell-newspapers-to-coast-of-your-mother , as if he did not know any toddler moderately educated that earthquakes are unpredictable in their particular time .

Along with the grief of the catastrophe, it is convenient, because it is human and noble (what else is stupid and gross ignoble animals), admire the Japanese resistance in all directions. To clarify: if there had been a 9 earthquake with its epicenter at a hundred miles from Santander, we are talking about hundreds of thousands or millions of deaths in Spain, since our seismic construction standards are not as demanding as the Japanese. I just read a good source (not Buenafuente, eye!) That there is in Barcelona (he was an engineer Catalan who said) not a single building, old or new, can withstand such an earthquake. In Lisbon, 1775, an earthquake similar to the last Japanese, followed by a tsunami, destroyed the city and caused a hundred thousand deaths, not only in Portugal, but also on the Andalusian coast of Cadiz and Huelva. A high percentage of buildings in Seville were affected and the effects are registered in Andalusia and in Castile. The tremor was felt in Finland.

Japan, hardworking and organized, have suffered and still suffering, despite all its serious precautions, a huge blow to physical, moral, human. It would have been desirable, and so I originally wanted in this "post" - not distracting us with a reprint of the ubiquitous talk of "nuclear threat", which never provide solutions. Here it would only be, if anything turns out to be true, criticizing the lack of any action recommended in Japan , given their special and known seismic hazards. But I hope still proceed further congratulations to the Japanese more than they deserve and for their efforts, if ultimately sustained despite the onslaught of such tremendous forces of nature and damage in many of its structures, manage, no longer control the nuclear crisis (as desired for 24 hours), but reduce its impact. What has happened so far can be explained by the earthquake and tsunami, the earthquake caused the automatic shutdown of the reactor, the cooling due to begin, the first cooling system (water pump) failed due to loss of supply ordinary electric, due to take up emergency power generators, but the crippled tsunami, were sought and still seek new ways of cooling, but the reactors have been overheating. There are still buildings or containment, expected to go abroad to avoid high radiation by a meltdown of the reactor, although seems to have broken at least one of these precincts. It's scary what can happen yet, despite what they are trying.

Some "little truths", given the stark, are these: 1 st) A nuclear plant is very different from an atomic bomb, starting with radioactive materials, 2 nd) In 1986, the great catastrophe of Chernobyl nuclear power plant badly constructed, was due to the virtual absence of the containment building , before, in 1979, Three Thousand Island, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania , evacuation was of thousands of people, but not dead, because the containment building withstood the meltdown. That is, until a few hours ago, there was only a catastrophic nuclear accident: the Chernobyl , for lack of a building or containment . Nobody could completely rule out more serious disaster, but the situation itself and in proportion to the unusual intensity (even for that area) the main quake, did not justify create panic. And now, it is understandable and justifiable many, the real threat to panic. But it is still unreasonable to panic from afar . The real panic panic, it's not wimpy politicians fear tiny panic offensive to the Japanese victims, you have to feel, what can you do?, When it comes . I felt in Japan before the main earthquake and before the tsunami. They feel to their replicas. to us, we corresponded and we correspond two more noble and altruistic: the serenity and compassion, to feel close and suffer or suffer with victims. And help is always possible. In contrast, the shouting empavorecido "Leaders" autonomous, local, national and foreign because of "their" nuclear power plants, completely silent on pain and suffering of Japan, is a spectacle of meanness and even cowardice. This kind of wee folk , miserable and foolish, cause of our human catastrophes . A closer reality-European, American, I refer. The Japanese will come out of this natural disaster, because there are a human catastrophe, but a nature strong and tenacious human. I add a link to the balloon Mingote March 14, great at his age and after so many geniuses. Although many will not understand, Mingote says it better than me:

http://www.abc.es/humor/20110314/mingote Les

add a link to THE WORLD, which comparative report of Chernobyl and Fukushima. I saw a comment from a reader who said, "more I read, reread and think, I find the parallels." Poor! Is that the report of the world, yet still very soft, which shows the contrast:

http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2011/03/15/internacional/1300208285.html

in country a long interview with important observations of a nuclear engineering expert. Read it if the subject interests them

http://www.elpais.com/edigitales/entrevista.html?encuentro=7818 #

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Breastofindianactress

" COMPETENT ": Elementary forgotten or dismissed


THE EX-OPPONENT ( TRIUMPHANT ) AND EX-YOUNG "


days ago, was the" competition "about which they have or not have our political leaders or other species. What I mean today, truly elementary, it also for any area of \u200b\u200bsocial life. And, in short, is this: not to be confused with principle final.

This confusion is exactly what occurs (or is encouraged, because sometimes it seems intentional) when, without more, is presented as definitive credential prestigious competition and even have a degree of Doctor or have earned (in a fair fight, presumably) difficult opposition (or two). In the career of a university professor (only one in which the doctorate account), the degree of Doctor is a second step, which should follow years of teaching, research and publications. If after PhD recently, not studying, not taught and does not investigate, will lean curriculum. If you took the number 1 in a competition of Notaries for 15, 20 or 30 years, but little has been exercised Notary, this is a distant initial success, but not before a professional career or to prove that at present, that brilliant opponent know law. The only thing that got Notaries credited to the first, with 25 years is that we worked very hard 3 or 4 years and, at 25, it had great memory, good head and more than decent fitness. But today, at 35, 45 or 55 years, knows how , what experience has even who that person depends on what you did (or did) in the 10, 20 or 30 years later his initial triumph bright. The mere passage of time only seeks oblivion of knowledge and intellectual mold . And within 10, 20 or 30 years of total dedication to the policy, without more, can ensure the greatest oversights and serious damage, intellectual and ethical.

is certainly legitimate, p. eg., remove Chair opposition to university or place of counsel for the Courts and immediately engage in politics, as it is entering the legal profession and be over there shortly to engage in advocacy. But for the same reason that neither the professor and counsel for the courts can reasonably show that mere status as if it constituted a curriculum vitae rich in merit, neither should the senior member of the political class that, their day, now distant, won a competition to a body more or less distinguished civil servant, but in which he has served not only for a short time.

Outside of politics and public life is very bad thing confused to the point of considering an initial victory (and in particular on an opposition very difficult, difficult or not glib: grades pretty relative) successful completion as irrevocable and life-course that really conferring jurisdiction and merit. But it is in politics where it is most often display the initial victory as a certificate of adequacy or excellence precisely the absence of a subsequent trajectory of successive and constant efforts, with new successes and other experiences may not be successful, but very relevant for the personnel training and human maturity, which are of great importance to hold public office.

Moreover, for the res publica to all, is often preferable, more prudent, the ignorant aware of this condition that the ignorant Smarty. I certainly feel a lot less panic before a perfectly ignorant (re) known as such that when a wiseacre who has not lost the great conceit that inflated the ego false superiority on the day, 10, 20 or 30, was " number one" in his class Important to Professional . The ignorant can learn today but cautious and, above all, be inclined to ask questions and study what it takes. The brainy presumptuous and believed not have to ask (or so he believes it, hence it is called believed ) considers it unnecessary. And if you contradict arguments, takes it very badly, as if it were a personal attack. Not accept or tolerate dissent and less complete disagreement. If unwisely puts others on the verge of actually disagree and disagree is clearly the victim of humiliation. As no mistakes (or, if committed, not willing to recognize), or does not rectify the matter in question or in his usual attitude. And keep making the same mistakes.

MERE YOUTH AS MERIT (and often SOLE AND DECISIVE MERIT)

Another common social phenomenon in our days, which is very useful to find out: youth as merit. Being young is, by itself, to certain political leaders and to an even greater number of young (stakeholders), merit even a decisive merit. is one of the great idiocies that permeate the last few years social life, here and in the wider world . Everyone knows that there are young very smart, intelligent, slow, short and very short. Everyone knows that there are young with a lot of momentum and others who say they were born tired and have done nothing but further trouble in his childhood and adolescence. We see young workers and other extremely vague. We see them wanting to eat the world and change, along with other mired in the torpor of the most absolute conformity. We see them with ideals and see them with utilitarianism and egoism that scare. Youth is, if we set aside topical speeches, in one sense and opposite- a temporary circumstance of human life that does not include or drag, of itself, other aspects of temperament, character, personality, strengths and weaknesses, but combined, in each individual, with many different features . A young person may even be, reveal a maturity and wisdom that no seniors, elderly and even longevity, which may continue to be so reckless and crackpots like 20 years, if not more, for the most "practical ". Despite these genuine evidence, we lived and still live in a time of youth, in itself, seems to be regarded as equivalent to ability and merit.

In political life especially where, for some purposes, the youth is too relative and you are young (of the Young Socialist Popular Convergence, etc.) Both at 18 and at 37 years, many people in positions of responsibility, even a lot of responsibility-for the simple fact of being young: more than 20 and less than 36 years . Fulano (or Perenganita) became head of this or that, Director General, Secretary of State, Minister, Deputy Advisor courtly, Secretary General, etc. when was it that said " a boy (or girl) bright "with a university and a conversation that appeared to reveal widespread culture," Reading "(if they were many and well assimilated or mere quotations of occasion, be discovered later.) Perhaps it was also an "active young " and willful. Thus began many current political leaders and then, after 10, 20 or 30 years, these people are, in terms of merit and ability, just as they started . If we were to say what are now these leaders, we could only say they are "ex-young "or, if you will," former bright young . " Sounds weird, right? But is not accurate in many cases?

I try to be objective and fair: some of the "bright young people" engaged in politics can be displayed, after its inception, good management of the jobs obtained. Become mature and competent real prestige and employment opportunities outside the public sector. When they speak, it shows they know what they say (something impossible to fake) and listened with interest. But unfortunately, these are exceptions to the rule. The rule is that once young people reach their fifties and no one, with dispassion, are considered as "professional brilliant" and even professional , neither good nor poor. So, even temporarily to stretch young people, have left to be young and have become only "ex-young."

I said before that the mere passage of time only seeks oblivion of knowledge and intellectual mold. I have to rectify, but to complete what comes with time. Because of the time, there is something that young people have never (we've never had): experience. O, at least enough experience. Neither life experience or professional experience enough. And experience is needed, is a great "asset" for the performance of many jobs and functions (but do not confuse experience with age and only interested in good experience: the very old, by itself, says nothing) . Dispense with the (good) experience or undervalued is nonsense as amazing as widespread, committed by you, being young, inexperienced and do not disdain to be taking precautions. But also committed and is higher still crime of which, in the throes of selecting and appointing others, for those who do, as they say, are still "green" (which will badly damaged). And do not decide in this sense of necessity (due to lack of experienced people, eg.) Or take warnings and cautions. Young men and women launched the stardom (at stars and crashing ), because the lack of experience which is sure to afflict themselves-does not seem of any importance, as worshipers are simply youth. So we have been in the wrong hands a efebocracia , which can be gerontocracy by "ex-young" .

Sunday, March 6, 2011

Red Label Rates In Hyderabad

2 MARCH 2011 IN 24 HOURS HISTORICAL Nonsense



Zapatero LO AND CIVIL CODE IS (YES, NO is a slip: CODE IS NOT CIVIL AND CRIMINAL )



  • Vds. be wondering if it tired me to refer, again and again, the sayings and doings of Mr. Rodríguez Zapatero, with is seen. Not that I be tired, exhausted and that I also disgusts me. But I think you can not pass over in silence her silly. If no one overcame boredom and fatigue, Zapatero would believe all we have settled or at least numb. Or all we have become fools. And it should not happen any of those things. ZP while still President of the "Government of Spain" it is foolish to overlook it says and do not let that said and done. Simply must be careful not to adjust.


On March 2, 2011 it became clear shining far reached by the President of the "Government of Spain" in mental deterioration in its loss sense of reality at its most congenital autism.

That historic day, ZP went to Tunisia and met with leaders of the fragile and still uncertain transition in that country. Upon arrival, said he would not give lessons, but support . But faithful to his constant infidelity to what it advertises and promises , ZP did not stop lessons on freedom and democracy, as if he knew anything of the two . In perfect simultaneity with the problems that are aggravated rapidly in Spain and with the enormous difficulties of the situation Tunis, ZP was there the way he apparently has come to believe it is: a charismatic world statesman. Given the reality of his thought (so to speak) and ability of expression, less than mediocre, the result was a sad, sad, display topics as may reiterate the streets, out loud, these notorious poor men because of alcohol and / or other evils.

The English daily newspaper and picked up the highlights of the visit. Lean:

"In Tunisia, ZP again elaborated on his experience of the Franco family: He recalled how he lived also the death of Franco, 15 years, and how the 18 could vote on the constitution. " worth what you have done. My father could not enjoy the freedoms and my grandfather was shot "."

"Socialist leader [sic ] urged them to seek consensus on all political and told that if by June do things right," success is guaranteed "." We know very well how to master the ZP time. Poor Tunisian if you ignore! But let us continue with the lessons, "" has to be a great consensus "on the rules of democracy, otherwise it will not succeed. In a democratic parliament will be easier to overcome political polarization ." (parliamentarian Bonita and profound theory! Parliament as a means to avoid polarization : I hope the Abbe Sieyes will be displayed at night to ZP . It's the least he deserves).

"In this regard, said judges who have served in the dictatorship accommodate the new democratic legislation . " Although there will be areas where you have to do surgery " said, referring to the retirement of judges who are not in harmony with the new political system. "

" " You do not know," the Prime Minister, "but they have won. I have got a great future for coming generations »

" Before his speech, the president of the democratic forum, Ben Jaafar, had asked him to lead the European Union in supporting Turkey and had said that " with his visit to his country, the EU is reconciled with European values \u200b\u200band democracy ." From this it follows that the Tunisian leaders did not know who to talk, because neither ZP is to lead the European Union at all (and less on support for Turkey : in any case, perhaps Erdogan could leave lead a while to Turkey to the European Union) or ZP know a word of " the Europe of values \u200b\u200band democracy ", which, incidentally, would have to look like Diogenes of Sinope wandered around Athens his lantern in search of an honest man.

addition to this surreal encounter with the leaders in question, strangely -concerned with what lies ahead in his home- the integration of Turkey into the EU , ZP heard interesting things.

"According to official sources (...), at a meeting held at the prestigious intellectual alone Fauzia Charfi , Secretary of State for Education in the Interim Government of Tunisia, Zapatero could hear the fears of the author "Islam and Freedom" , one of the masterpieces of Islamic defense of secularism, the growing penetration of radicalism in college classrooms. "

" In this respect, Zapatero has said in the closed-door meeting: " Please keep state religion", if they want to ensure the progress of democracy . "Bie, elementary and obvious, but well, just missed the most important and the positive: defend religious freedom. Admittedly it was like wait wait elm pears, because the freedom it still sounds ZP, but if his name is "religious," he sounds really bad.

But the most striking thing was the excitement of ZP, barely contained, touching hand the trembling hope of Tunisia. To encourage, ZP has sent its staff and partners intimísimo feeling, almost ineffable, with this amazing statement:

"I do not know how to enjoy democracy. Even as I do, you can become president of the government. "

The other great phrase of the day, with accents of epic role has been:

"Spain will be at the forefront helping to consolidate the democratic process in the Arab world."

other words, democracy has installed in the "Arab world" and needs only consolidated. And there, says ZP, Spain will head. was in getting to this point when I said " This man can not be taken for a ride to the Tunisians, the so-called" Arab world ", the English and the millions of citizens of third countries . This man is sick in the head . "

I do not know if you bought have thought deeply. I am coming for a while now (I have witnesses) but now I dare to speak and publish. Mr. Rodriguez Zapatero is a huge problem for us all , that , well looked , is a problem concerning the Civil Law , part on people and in particular to marital status and status of persons . It's a case of the Civil Code, Title IX ("Of the disability") of Book I ("Of the people"). If your father or your grandfather ZP say what he says and keep some to dispose of something and physically unable to exercise this power of disposal (if I could go out and approach a Notary), any of us would say, "Dad must disable", "we must disable the grandfather . become our eyes to the art. 200 of the Civil Code: " are causes of disability or disease persistent weaknesses in physical or mental disability preventing the person govern itself ." Painfully would think the risk-to our own father or grandfather, ; for your family and for others, allowing anyone who says so many great stupid to buy, sell, pledge, borrow, bankrupt, etc. And without hesitation would have recourse to the process of impeachment, urgent measures of internment.

I will not ask, lest you think that I'm crazy-that is the prosecutor, legally entitled to promote disability, who takes the initiative. But it appears that would be appropriate, because the known family of ZP probably not adversely affect what this man can spend, transfer, guarantee, etc., Since it is going to do without committing or compromising his family. For situations like that is legally the prosecution. It happens, unfortunately, that for what is now the prosecution is for the legality .

In those 24 hours, ZP not captured completely factual nonsense. Two ministers of his "Government of Spain were in tune (Ms. Pajín, triministra, had quite a quiet day, which is welcome, in strict justice). See:

JOSEPH WHITE, IN MADRID:

"The speed limit will help curb the price of mortgages

D. Joseph White, (a) "Cucumber", linked the consumption of fuels with lower inflation and this with the cost of mortgages and other prices. No need to know much to question the automatic nature of the relationship so clear it is for the witty "Cucumber." What is true is that the less we spend on fuel, we will be more money to pay the mortgage, to buy bacon to the stew. So, against the popular, us that speed is being dealt with bacon .

[SECTION: A few hours later, a Director General, the Police, used an official plane to go to Cordoba, which comes with the bird in less than two hours. Pass, even if wrong, use the Falcon ZP officer to return to sleep in Madrid before leaving for Tunisia: is the Prime Minister. But that a Director General, as the police, are allowed to spend ten times the official avioncito in high-speed transport is not only an arrogant and brazen affront to all but a strong indication that our government considered Spain a police state . No other Director General imagine even being able to take his position this way: it is within your reach. For less than that, an absolute mockery and derision of all English-forced saving takes to the streets the people. Here not even form a platform Feisbuq .] [NEW SECTION: shortly after the flight of Police Mayor, D. José Blanco, the lunatics have to call them for you: no more affectionate nickname, uttered these inspiring words: " could close the Autonomous Community of Madrid. It would be a great saving measure " As no joke funny. But that "we could close" is, as evidence, very revealing. It's a tic generalote of nineteenth century, giving "shots of coffee daily. Maybe you have to discuss it more slowly.]

MIGUEL SEBASTIAN IN MADRID:

This Mr. D. Miguel Sebastian , rare person has left his long silence as absent have opened the doors of the occurrences with energy saving. And, in style and genial weirdo / Locoid, has returned to his hobby bulbs (now, after the low consumption, LED), enlarged tires (the Autonomous Communities withdraw 250,000) and public office lights, to shut off when no one is. But we must recognize that Sebastián, Minister of Industry, said no nonsense lately notable quotes and phrases for review . He writes nonsense and wants others to do . Or tell makes Rubalcaba, who solemnly expresses scandal to see the lights of a public office at 21.30 hours, without stopping to think if that time does not match the cleaning schedule . also no lights are on does not constitute saving measure, but the elemental undue waste disposal : not need legal or regulatory reform: just someone to put out .

FINAL CLIP OF THE PRESIDENT OF "GOVERNMENT OF SPAIN, ALWAYS IN TUNISIA

face unemployment data in February 2011, 4'3 million unemployed and an increase 68,260 people standing in a single months, ZP sentenced, also in Tunisia:

"The data is bad, but less bad than in February last year, much less bad than the previous year"

is right: in February 2010 unemployment increased by 82,132 unemployed and in February 2009, at 154,058. But do not you go leaving fewer people to stop? Is it reasonable comfort as well?

also from Spain, ZP prophesied in Tunisia :

"The recovery in 2012 will be felt and experienced by English society."

here could make an easy joke: " that's for sure: in 2012, sure: as you go, boy ." But I do not mine the joke, because the footprint of ZP & Friends (those who do anything they were a legion and now only a dwindling group, who call themselves "advantage while you can") will be lasting.

To the above: ZP is to incapacitate .

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Vajina Hair Style Images

Plagiarism," MORTAL SIN "IN THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY


German example and "Counterexample" SPANISH:
one has to resign as prime minister; BE ANOTHER PROFESSOR GETS


  • The case of Karl Theodor zu Gutenberg , Who recently resigned as Minister of Defence of the Federal Republic of Germany for plagiarism in his doctoral thesis, I recalled another real case of plagiarism, here in Spain with an unedifying end. As we are dealing with plagiarism the real intellectual property, clear and naked. And with its shameless and immoral violation.

Sometimes I have claimed the existence of a new and true Academic Disciplinary Regulations, the State level, because not seem appropriate standards of each university or consider satisfactory, for teachers and university researchers, the general discipline public officials. Just thinking about plagiarism, not expressly stated in the civil service disciplinary system, and had more than enough reason for dissatisfaction, I foresee endless.

Plagiarism in a doctoral thesis in a book or a magazine article, more or less extensive, is the appropriation of an intellectual work of others. That itself is a direct violation of intellectual property. Within the University, as in other scientific communities-one can hardly imagine a more serious illegal behavior to try to snatch their authors the products of the intellect. Support knowledge- others, on the achievements of others, others reached the goals is not only perfectly legal, but mandatory. Rarely does anyone own intellectual beget a child without a history, moreover, have served as a basis for personal creation. But to account for the support of the grounds and the history of the product that are reasonably considered himself quotations, references and appropriate references to works of others.

Sometimes the conclusion or conclusions reached and exposed as someone may lack originality personal, not to be named in any way other authors (and all), that once supported the same token, the same idea. Plagiarism is not necessarily in those cases, quite numerous in the area of \u200b\u200blaw. To declare the personal reasoned position on a matter, on a point, is not always required, for many reasons and motives, read and cite all those tried before the same subject or issue. Sometimes not accessible, despite modern facilities, all the works that may have addressed this issue or question. Sometimes something else happens: p. eg., that the limited scope of the expression of one's mind on an issue, limiting the reader (or listener) understand without difficulty becomes unreasonably disproportionate searches and specific citations. That what one says or writes is original is not plagiarism if it is not intended to say or write is original and proper.

The key to plagiarism is, in my opinion, the presentation and original creature itself, or be a result of intellectual effort, either the result or expression of the path traveled to reach it, or more of these elements . On a doctoral thesis or a book, the appropriation of the alien may refer to the substance or expression. The most frequent kidnappings, in my area, are those in which the plagiarist endorses the same words and phrases that express one or more ideas. Sometimes, plagiarism is as consisting of pure crude copy of the work of another or a set of copies of portions of the work or works of others, which are presented as if they were product of the staff of shameless literary effort.

arguable
There are cases of plagiarism: two mathematicians may have the same work, embodied perhaps in two pages, more or less same. If plagiarism or coincidence of effort (very frequent) and results will be taken to resolve it by carefully studying the circumstances of such persons. The plot similarities of two novels, with or without the addition of similar structure of the narrative, but with different text style, also may be due to mere coincidence (Eg., In an earlier common source of inspiration.) Again be examined very carefully the data and compare the work with thoroughness and perspicacity. There are, however, cases of plagiarism very clear (and few). And it's also what we call in college slang, " squad", common in general works (handbooks, précis , Hand - or Lehrbuch) or large documents will not necessarily published (old memories, required to participate in competitions at university teaching positions.) By " squad," an author "draws heavily" in the work of other domestic or foreign, and repeats it-from top to bottom or part to change the wording and some other changes, to hide and perhaps even improve some aspects. Little can be done when someone will just "catch" it. Sometimes the "execution" is as "good", the "Rifleman" did not attempt to admit, even to the "shot."

But it is my intention to produce now a little manual on possible violations of intellectual property. I just want to remember the painful and reprehensible phenomenon of plagiarism, in line with two real examples. The first, very current and well known: plagiarism has committed a public German high relevance. The second was carried out, many years ago by a English university professor. As soon see the consequences of the discovery of the attack on intellectual property have been very different.

GERMANY: PLAGIARISM BY THE MINISTER OF DEFENSE, THE STREET

The " young, rich, modern and aristocrat (a" Freiherr ", a Baron) Karl Theodor ( von und ) zu Guttenberg, until a few hours ago Defence Minister of the Federal Republic of Germany (he had been Minister on two previous occasions), presented at the time a doctoral thesis entitled " Constitution and the Constitutional Treaty: Constitutional developments in the U.S. and the EU " adopted cum laude from the University of Bayreuth . Someone (we speak of a Professor of Bremen), at some point, I had to "sound" certain passages of the thesis and began to investigate, to find a good number of sets of sentences (at least 20% estimated of the thesis) reproduced from other authors without any appointment. The question becomes "affair" because it circulates on the Internet (where he nicknamed "Googleberg") and comes in the papers ( Süddeutsche Zeitung, Der Spiegel , Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung ) Then the Minister (at times the most popular Cabinet Merkel) behaves as follows:

a) acknowledges mistakes in handling sources and ask for forgiveness and apologize to those affected;

b) Waiver temporarily to use the title Doctor, pending an investigation;

c) markedly Dislikes University of Bayreuth with the occurrence of the temporary waiver because University is interested in the merits of the case: if the Minister has committed plagiarism and failed to pledge or oath of honor. And the University can and should be removed if it obtained title trickery;

d) See how the University of Bayreuth him off the title of Doctor;

e) states that resigns as Minister , because the errors were unintentional and non-plagiarized , obtained the support of Mrs. Angela Merkel ;

f) accepted you will need to investigate " how could lose control of their sources "

g) Note that neither the public nor the Bundestag accepted his thesis of " unintentional plagiarism."

h) resigns as Minister .

To me, the truth, I am sorry that this promising minister has had to go to the street , castiza but inaccurate term because it is possible person, we say in Spain, and will not hunger and distress. I'm happy for the Germans because who is able to "copy-paste" in a doctoral thesis in Germany appears well prepared for major crimes . A guy who says he is determined to investigate how he lost "control of their sources," is a good piece , a rogue very prominent. So, congratulations to Germany and its people. The effective pressure of what they call "academics" ( Akademiker die) and because they have made an important and well smartass situadao likely to return to climb political summits.

But see the contrast with the English example.

SPAIN: THE PLAGIARISM, THE CHAIR

The following story is true in all detail. I have set out chapter and verse on two occasions when I had a duty to do so. The star arrived through a notary public to require me not to broadcast the events under injunction to bring against me all kinds of actions. Through the same intermediary told him that "reincidiría" every time he came to mind and that he felt free to exercise their rights as he pleased. I did not hear the case, though the character is still active. I will not give his real name here (use another fictional, such as universities) for two reasons: one, because not met officially now a duty to disclose to that detail the events, ever more distant in time, two , to bypass the hassles of a second notice of attorney or something similar.

Let the "plagiarism English," fully real. 20 years ago or so. Alfonsin López Cara is a young professor of Procedural Law at the University of Sidra. One of his students at delivers Bachelor, "up note" (make merit extra), care work, although elementary, little attention on one aspect of a subject heading of any program in the subject, a subject with no facets process directly. Alfonsin, who is in the middle stage of "making curriculum, plagiarize or copy the student's work with only slight tweaks and sends it to a journal not widely disseminated, which published it. The student learns the publication and see that it is his job, barely masking minimum effort. A professor at the same university, very indignant, conducts a comparative study in two columns, absolutely devastating for López Cara: plagiarism is undeniable. The University of La Sidra decided to open disciplinary proceedings Alfonsin. Judge appointed instructor. And this, after appropriate proceedings, does not see, in general disciplinary regulations of public officials, other administrative offense clearer than that which is defined as conduct constituting crime. Thus, the Chancellor passed the papers to the Department. And the Chief Prosecutor of the territory where is located the University of cider (not a prosecutor any), issued a paper (one page) with a few lines (five or six) in which, without going into the merits of the case ( that is, without affirming or denying the plagiarism), invokes the so-called principle of minimum intervention "(a principle that should inspire legislators to not go making it a felony or any facts alleged failure) and concluded that the facts do not require or justify the initiation of criminal proceedings. Apparently, for the chief prosecutor, has no criminal authority to appropriate someone else's work or short elemental (p. eg., a quatrain, or a line from a sonnet by Quevedo and Miguel Hernandez, or a whole book, but who has not entered into the Parnassus, according to the Prosecutor). (By the way , that prosecutor came to the top of his career, missing more: with the ductility, who better than him).

concise
After qualifying as criminal justice, the Rector of the Universidad de La Sidra supersedes the disciplinary proceedings against López Cara Alfonsin. But something happens, D. Alfonsin University belongs in relatively borderline and then leaves the University of Sidra, where plagiarism feat had reached a high local reputation. Over time (without which our protagonist estimated range of industry benchmarks) and presented to the competition for professorships. Being unique and unknown candidate, apparently, the episode at the University of La Sidra, is given placet. Spend a little more time and the flamboyant professor presents the competition to Chair of the University of A Pedriña. And then D. Alfonsin, exceeding by far to early and ex-Minister Zu Gutenberg, has no qualms about arguing and presenting specifically, between the merits of research (not exactly plentiful), the small work plagiarized. It was a lot of recklessness or extreme impudence. Or both (personally assume thesis). Alfonsin had not been rectified or repentant behavior which was available for years. So Alfonsin continues to have no moral, but it has sponsors and friends of their sponsors in the court of Chair: just the magic number: three amoral about five. And it goes without saying that Professor is proposed. In the official report stated the facts are narrated and accompanied by copies of all documentation. Legal claim is made. A warm and fearful of rejecting Rector. He was appointed Professor. And to this day. There is Alfonsín López Cara, who repeatedly obtained those positions free classes ("special services") and has changed several times a jacket policy. Nor was there enough pressure in Spain of "academic" to dispense the plagiarist forever and nobody can wonder that, in counseling, follow reports by copying others. Many of my colleagues, not the majority, but enough: even harmed by the promotion of plagiarism, had the "flexibility" and "realism" to share with the university empresillas element. I did not want or see the following: plagiarism, to me, is like the "sin against the Holy Spirit" ( quaestio diputata even of what such a sin), only that God does not forgive. I had forgotten, yes, the "sin" of D. Alfonsin. But I remembered because of the history of poor Karl Theodor (von und) zu Guttenberg, the loss of control over their sources (would not it be that lost control over its "black" as has happened many times?).

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

Note For Wedding Welcome Bag

AFTER THE" DAY OF ANDALUSIA ": WHAT YOU SANG AND FELT IN THE PAST" TRANSITION "


A TRIBUTE AND REMEMBRANCE CARLOS CANO, rest in peace.

That
Day of Andalusia and in the 2011, after long time of hopes and disappointments, I can not think of anything better than hearing "La Murga OF CURRELANTES " written and sung by this Andalusian great, honest and spirited, which was CARLOS CANO , this always be remembered for his personality, his music and lyrics.

Here are two links. The first one may also hear the excellent " GREEN, WHITE AND GREEN " a song dedicated to the official flag of the Autonomous Community of Andalusia:


CARLOS CANO
a man was clearly committed. Committed and clear. But never sour, always friendly and, even more impressive, always an artist. Not take advantage of their art for minor political or politicized at the expense of his art, like so many others (especially, so many great poets, who went from the sublime to the pathetic savings are examples). Simply - there is nothing! - Was what it was, an artist, great musician, in his people and with it, but universal, never parochial and redneck.

Here it is, very young, with an early version of "La Murga OF CURRELANTES" :

Http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dkKrAAsUIo&feature=related

But do not miss singing CARLOS CANO, also very young, " SPECULATION" , a kind of "run." Are you sure it was yesterday?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpbhY6S61-U&feature=related

More truths-no, CARLOS CANO was true and honest feelings, not demagoguery: it was felt truths - in "trash fish " :


CARLOS CANO, a champion of Andalusia, exceptional artist (what singers have Spain or Europe, with so many great songs, so personal and so unusual?), Melted into each other and his work on common sense and inspired passion. Listen to this "POLICY NOT BE ESABORÍA " (for non-English: "esaborío" or "esaboría" tasteless Andalusian contraction, desaborido, ie, unfriendly, rough).


And
term " LEAVE" , ladies and gentlemen: